Fertility
How AI could revolutionise implantation prediction
Fairtility’s Cristina Hickman tells us how AI could change the fertility world and what it would mean for thousands of aspiring parents.
In vitro fertilisation (IVF) is the most effective form of assisted reproductive technology. Due to the complexity of the procedure, however, prediction of embryonic implantation prior to IVF is key in decision-making.
The Israeli software company Fairtility aims to maximise IVF outcomes by using AI and computer vision algorithms to analyse morphological and morphokinetic features and provide early, data-driven embryo quality.
“It’s essentially an assistant that supports embryologists and gives them superpowers,” says Dr Cristina Hickman, researcher and embryologist. “Using computer science that highlights the things that we may have missed [in the embryo selection process] is a completely different way of practising biology compared to how we did it before.”
The AI-based system could, in fact, standardise the practice, she explains. “We want patients to get access to the best possible treatment all the time. Very often different embryologists look at different pieces of information. So, the tools that we use will have an impact both in terms of improving our ability to pick the correct embryo, but also in terms of enhancing consistency in practice.
“We already have a number of studies that we’ve done with several different clinics to show how embryologists assess the embryos and how the AI systems assess the embryos,” Hickman continues. “We’re not disagreeing with each other. We just make the whole process faster and consistent, so that over time, we can get to the point where we can bring more cycles per embryologist and make treatments more affordable.”
The other benefit of the algorithm would be a better understanding of the IVF success rates. According to the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology (SART), patients have rated the stress of undergoing IVF as more stressful than or almost as stressful as any other major life event, such as the death of a family member, separation or divorce. “Analysing the embryo would allow us to see any anomalies and see if it has a very low chance of becoming a healthy baby,” says Dr Hickman.
“Within a touch of a button, the embryologist has the ability to share information with the patients directly from the system. For example, they can see images, videos and even summary reports saying how many embryos are fertilised. Therefore, all patients can have this experience of transparency and they can see what the embryologist sees.
“They can also understand the risk of getting a negative result and they don’t have to go through that emotional roller coaster,” the researcher adds. “This means that the patients would be in a better emotional position to go back and do another cycle because they understood this journey a little bit better. Our aim overall is to bring less stress and more stability in this process.”
Dr Hickman argues that the management of expectations of patients is incredibly important in IVF and there is no such thing as a one-size-fits-all approach. “Not everybody has the same chance of pregnancy and this personalisation in the way we deliver information is based on what we know about the embryo.
“Historically, we used to speak to two different patients in exactly the same way,” she says. “But we may have a patient who has a very high chance of pregnancy and one that has a very low chance of pregnancy and therefore, the latter is actually going to suffer more by receiving that super positive feedback.
“The transparency, I think, is crucial to that relationship between the facility professional and the patient. While it might seem harsh to provide the full information upfront, in my experience the patients feels more comforted and they trust us more.”
Hickman would like to see a future where the patient is entitled to receive all the information they need in order to decide how best to move forward.
“What we’ve seen up to now is the embryologist saying: ‘I will overlay what my needs are into patients and make my best guess of what’s best for them’. But that has to change and we need to get to the point where the patient is engaged and empowered, not taking a back seat,” she adds.
“That fluidity of information will give them more energy to be able to go through the entire journey, even through the disappointing aspects of it, because they’ve participated in the whole process. And this is very much the direction where Fairtility is going.”
For more information, visit fairtility.com
Fertility
France urges 29-year-olds to start families now
France is urging 29-year-olds to have children as part of a 16-point plan to boost fertility and raise birth rates.
Health officials say the aim is to prevent men and women facing fertility problems later in life and thinking “if only I had known”.
The strategy comes as the country, like many western nations including the UK, faces tumbling birth rates.
The trend is creating concerns about how governments can fund pensions and healthcare for ageing populations with fewer younger working people paying taxes.
But policies to raise fertility rates globally have produced limited results, and critics of the scheme suggest better housing and maternity provision could be more effective.
The government will send out “targeted, balanced, and scientifically sound information” to young people on issues including sexual health and contraception.
The material “will also reiterate that fertility is a shared responsibility between women and men,” the country’s health ministry said.
The plan includes efforts to increase the number of egg-freezing centres from 40 to 70. The process involves extracting and storing a woman’s eggs for potential future use.
The country’s health system already provides free egg-freezing for people aged 29 to 37, a service that costs about £5,000 per round in the UK.
The country’s fertility rate of 1.56 children per woman is below the 2.1 needed to maintain a stable population.
However, it is higher than rates in China, Japan and South Korea, and the UK, where the latest figures show it dropped to a record low of 1.41 in England and Wales by 2024.
Professor François Gemenne, who specialises in sustainability and migration at HEC Paris Business School, told Sky News: “This is something that demographers had known for a long time, but the fact that there were more deaths than births in France last year created a shock effect.”
He said the country’s “demographic worry” is exacerbated by the design of its pensions system and its “obsession with immigration and the fear of being ‘replaced'”.
The plan also includes a new national communication campaign, a “My Fertility” website advising on the effects of smoking, weight and lifestyle, and school lessons for children about reproductive health.
The health ministry has acknowledged its maternal and infant mortality rates are higher than neighbouring countries and is beginning a review of perinatal care to address the “concerning” situation.
Channa Jayasena, professor in reproductive endocrinology at Imperial College London, told Sky News: “On the female side, societal changes leading to older age of motherhood are certainly important.
He said obesity was also a problem as it increased women’s risk of polycystic ovary syndrome and endometriosis.
Allan Pacey, professor of andrology (male reproductive health) at Manchester University, said for most people globally, deciding to have children was “down to [non-medical] factors such as better access to education, career opportunities, taxation, housing, mortgages, finance, etc.”
“Medicine can’t help with those things,” Pacey added.
Insight
Covid vaccine not linked to decrease in childbirth, study finds
Insight
Parents sue IVF clinic after delivering someone else’s baby
A Florida couple have sued an IVF clinic after giving birth to a baby who is not genetically related to either of them.
Tiffany Score and Steven Mills hired IVF Life, which operates as the Fertility Center of Orlando in Longwood to help them conceive about five years ago using in vitro fertilisation.
The couple had an embryo implanted in April and welcomed a baby girl nine months later, but soon suspected the clinic had made an error.
Both Score and Mills are white, but the baby had the appearance of a racially non-Caucasian child, according to the lawsuit.
Genetic testing confirmed that the baby is not biologically theirs. The couple filed the lawsuit on 22 January after allegedly trying to contact the clinic multiple times without getting a response.
Jack Scarola, one of the couple’s lawyers, told the Orlando Sentinel: “They have fallen in love with this child. They would be thrilled in the knowledge that they could raise this child.
“But their concern is that this is someone else’s child, and someone could show up at any time and claim the baby and take that baby away from them.”
Score and Mills are also concerned that one of the three fertilised eggs they had frozen at the clinic may have been mistakenly implanted into someone else.
They have demanded that the clinic share what happened with all other patients who had embryos stored at the facility during the year before Score gave birth. They also want IVF Life to pay for genetic testing of every child born as a result of its services over the last five years, and to account for their remaining embryos.
The couple said in a statement: “We love our little girl. We would hope to be able to continue to raise her ourselves with confidence that she won’t be taken away from us.
“At the same time, we are aware that we have a moral obligation to find and notify her biological parents, as it is in her best interest that her genetic parents are provided the option to raise her as their own.”
A family spokesperson said: “Based upon leads discovered to date, and despite the lack of help or cooperation from the clinic, there is hope that we will be able to introduce our daughter to her genetic parents and to find our own genetic child soon.”
The lawsuit names IVF Life LLC and Dr Milton McNichol, who runs the clinic.
The Fertility Center of Orlando had posted a notice on its website stating it is “actively cooperating with an investigation to support one of our patients in determining the source of an error that resulted in the birth of a child who is not genetically related to them.”
The notice was removed after a court hearing on Wednesday.
During the hearing, the judge ordered the clinic to submit a thorough plan for handling the situation by Friday.
McNichol was reprimanded by Florida’s Board of Medicine in May 2024 after an inspection of the clinic in June 2023 revealed several issues, including equipment that did not meet current performance standards, failure to comply with a risk-management plan and missing medication.
He was fined US$5,000.
-
Features4 weeks agoWomen’s health enters a new era – the trends shaping femtech in 2026
-
Insight4 weeks agoDesigner perfumes recalled over banned chemical posing fertility risk
-
Features4 weeks agoBest menopause apps and products for 2026
-
Insight2 weeks agoParents sue IVF clinic after delivering someone else’s baby
-
Insight3 weeks agoWomen’s health could unlock US$100bn by 2030
-
Insight4 weeks agoHigher maternal blood pressure increases risk of pregnancy complications, study finds
-
Fertility4 weeks agoXella Health closes US$3.7 million in pre-seed financing
-
Insight4 weeks agoInside the first wave of speakers confirmed for Women’s Health Week USA 2026






Pingback: How AI could revolutionise implantation prediction - Fairtility