News
NHS to trial blood test to detect early-stage ovarian cancer
The trial is set to run in Walsall, Sandwell and Birmingham for 18 months

The NHS is to trial an advanced blood test that may help detect early-stage ovarian cancer in a move that could save “thousands of lives”.
The trial, set to run across the West Midlands for 18 months, involves a blood test called ROMA (Risk of Ovarian Malignancy Algorithm).
The test looks at the CA125 score – a marker for ovarian cancer – the HE4 test score and the woman’s menopausal status to check for pre- and post-menopausal risk of cancer and malignant disease from ovarian cancer.
As part of the trial, it will be offered to those experiencing ovarian cancer symptoms to try and identify the disease at an earlier stage.
The project, led by Sandwell and West Birmingham and Walsall Healthcare NHS Trust, in partnership with the University of Birmingham, will see ROMA given to patients at GP surgeries run by care provider Modality.
Ovarian cancer is the fourth most common cause of cancer-related death in women worldwide. In the UK, it is the sixth most common cancer, with around 7,500 new cases every year.
“Unfortunately [for] women in the UK, the majority of women will be diagnosed at stage three or four ovarian cancer, when the cancer has spread beyond the ovaries and into other parts of the tummy,” Professor Sudha Sundar, from the University of Birmingham, told the BBC.
“If we are able to shift the way in which we are diagnosing ovarian cancer now, we will be able to substantially increase the number of lives saved in the UK and worldwide.
“I would put that number as thousands of lives [potentially] saved.”
Early detection of ovarian cancer can significantly improve the overall survival rate of women diagnosed with the disease.
However, diagnosis can be delayed since early signs may not be obvious. In the UK, one in five women with ovarian cancer are diagnosed in A&E and many do not receive any treatment for their disease, often because they are too unwell by the time they are diagnosed.
Researchers at Imperial College London have previously suggested that using loyalty card data on over-the-counter medicine purchases could help spot ovarian cancer cases earlier.
Dr James Flanagan, lead author for the study, from Imperial’s Department of Surgery & Cancer, said: “Using shopping data, our study found a noticeable increase in purchases of pain and indigestion medications among women with ovarian cancer up to eight months before diagnosis, compared with women without ovarian cancer.
“This suggests that long before women have recognised their symptoms as alarming enough to go to the GP, they may be treating them at home.
“As we know early diagnosis of ovarian cancer is key to improving chances of survival, we hope this research can lead to ovarian cancer symptoms being picked up earlier and improve patients’ options for treatment,” he added.
News
Women better protected against early Parkinson’s neurodegeneration, study finds

Women with an early precursor to Parkinson’s disease show much less brain shrinkage than men, despite similar disease severity, new research shows.
The discovery could help scientists explore how hormones might one day be used to treat the neurodegenerative condition.
The findings are based on data from nearly 700 participants across nine international research centres.
The study focused on isolated REM sleep behaviour disorder — a condition in which people physically act out their dreams.
It is considered the most reliable early warning sign of diseases caused by toxic protein build-up in the brain.
More than 70 per cent of those affected later develop Parkinson’s disease, Lewy body dementia or multiple system atrophy, which affects several body systems.
Researchers from Université de Montréal analysed 888 brain scans from centres in Canada, the Czech Republic, the UK, France, Australia, Denmark and Italy.
After quality checks, 687 participants were included: 343 patients with the sleep disorder and 344 healthy controls.
The results revealed clear sex-based differences.
While 37 per cent of the cortical areas — the brain’s outer layer responsible for higher functions — showed thinning in men, only one per cent of regions were affected in women.
This difference remained even though participants were of similar age (around 67) and had comparable clinical profiles.
Marie Filiatrault is first author of the study and a doctoral student at Université de Montréal.
The researcher said: “Men show much more extensive and severe cortical thinning — the outer layer of the brain that controls our higher functions — than women, particularly in areas linked to movement, sensation, vision and spatial orientation.”
To understand the protective effect, researchers compared brain images with gene activity in different regions, measured in healthy brains after death.
They found that the less-affected areas in women showed higher expression of genes related to oestrogen function, particularly ESRRG and ESRRA, which produce oestrogen-related hormone receptors.
The ESRRG gene was especially notable, showing greater activity in brain tissue than elsewhere in the body.
These receptors play key roles in mitochondrial function — the cell’s energy production system — and in the survival of dopamine-producing neurons, the cells that die in Parkinson’s disease.
Shady Rahayel is professor at Université de Montréal’s Faculty of Medicine and lead author of the study.
Rahayel said: “This sleep disorder offers a unique window of opportunity to study the mechanisms of neurodegeneration before major motor or cognitive symptoms appear.
“Our results suggest that certain brain areas in women with isolated REM sleep behaviour disorder are better protected than those in men, likely through the action of oestrogens.”
The team chose to study this precursor condition because it allows observation of brain protection mechanisms before major motor symptoms develop.
Although only 25 to 40 per cent of people with Parkinson’s experience REM sleep behaviour disorder, studying this early stage gives insight into how the brain resists damage when it is still limited.
Previous studies have shown that women with established Parkinson’s disease tend to experience slower progression than men, pointing to similar protective effects.
The findings could shape future research and treatment development.
The authors recommend separating men and women in clinical trials, which could improve statistical accuracy and reduce the number of participants required.
The biological mechanisms identified — particularly those linked to the ESRRG gene — could also become potential therapeutic targets.
Early laboratory research suggests that increasing ESRRG activity may protect dopamine-producing neurons from the toxic effects of alpha-synuclein, a protein that builds up abnormally in the brains of people with Parkinson’s.
“This study brings us closer to precision medicine, where treatments could be tailored not only to the disease but also to individual biological characteristics, including sex,” said Rahayel.
News
Dozens of women report suffering painful burns after using Always sanitary towels

Dozens of women have claimed online that Always sanitary towels caused painful burns, prompting a response from the Procter & Gamble-owned brand.
Several TikTok users have posted videos describing reactions to the company’s products in recent days.
The clips, which have gained thousands of views, include complaints of itching, rashes and what users describe as chemical burns — skin damage caused by contact with irritating substances.
In one video viewed 45,000 times, user @ratqueen910 said the pads gave her “the worst chemical burns ever” in her groin area, where underwear meets the leg.
“When I looked at the burn with the flash on it really looked like my skin was gooey! I was scared af,” she told commenters.
She said she first thought the pain was chafing or an allergic reaction to spandex in her underwear, before seeing other women online describe the same symptoms.
“I realised that so many people have had problems the last few months with these pads,” she said.
“It’s not like, ‘oh, I switched over to Always pads’ — no, I’ve used them since I was in like sixth grade.
“So they must have changed the formula, messed something up, put some extra chemicals in that sh**t because it messed me up. I had chemical burns. I had issues and I didn’t know what it was.”
She said a doctor suggested another cause for the irritation, but she believes the pads were to blame, noting she had never been sensitive to scents or suffered urinary or yeast infections before.
Her post drew hundreds of comments, with many women saying they too had reactions to Always’ Flexfoam pads.
One wrote: “The whole area that the pad touched gave me a chemical burn after only a few hours. It was the Flexfoam.”
The original poster replied: “Mine was Flexfoam as well.”
While users did not specify exact product types, Always sells both day and night versions of its Infinity Pads with Flexfoam, which appear to be those mentioned.
Another commenter said: “Just a few days ago I was on my period using Always pads and I was f**king itching and it was burning. I never itch or have pain down there. I took the pad off so quick.”
A third wrote: “I switched to Honey Pot and had been fine. When my coworker gave me an Always pad, I was hesitant but used it — and got a chemical burn.”
Others described repeated irritation.
One said: “I use another brand for the first half of my period, then Always for the last two days, and I’ve had this burn for three months in a row. Stopped using them last month and no issue.”
Some also reported rashes or itching. One wrote: “In real time I am itching and getting a rash. I wore an Always pad earlier today.”
An Always spokesperson told the Daily Mail: “Our pads are used safely by millions of women every day around the world.
“Their safety is our top priority, and we carefully evaluate every component of our Always products to minimise the chances of skin irritation or allergic reactions.”
Opinion
Listening to pain: What eight women taught me about the state of women’s health in the UK

By Ruby Raut, founder & CEO, WUKA
It’s Ruby here, founder of WUKA and, like many of you, someone who’s been dismissed, doubted, and left waiting far too long when it comes to menstrual health.
Last week, I spoke at an event hosted by the Menstrual Health Project. It wasn’t just another panel or pitch session; it was a wake-up call.
The room was filled with GPs, pharmacists, educators, innovators, and women who have lived the daily reality of conditions like endometriosis, PCOS, PMDD, and premature ovarian insufficiency.
We weren’t there to celebrate solutions. We were there to listen. And what we heard broke us open.
The Stories Behind the Statistics
I walked out of that room with one page of notes — not data, not theory, but pain in ink.
The stories were raw and repetitive. Women told us of:
- 14 years of seeking help and getting none.
- 3 decades of living in pain.
- Being laughed at for wanting to come off contraception.
- Being told to “just go on the pill.”
- Waiting for a laparoscopy since 2015, and still waiting in 2025.
- Being asked to gain weight to get a period or lose weight to manage PCOS.
- Being offered pregnancy as a “solution.”
- Losing jobs because of endometriosis.
This is not an isolated list of frustrations. It’s a mirror reflecting the state of women’s health in the UK today.
Behind every statistic, there’s a woman who has rearranged her life around pain, missed promotions, cancelled plans, and lost trust in her own body.
The System Is Failing Us, and We Know It
Hearing these stories, I couldn’t help but think of it like a leaking roof.
You notice the drip, you report it, but you’re told it’s nothing serious, to just wait it out.
Days turn into months, months into years. By the time someone finally takes a proper look, the ceiling has collapsed.
That’s what living with an untreated women’s health condition feels like, small symptoms dismissed until they become impossible to ignore. That’s what our healthcare system is doing to women.
We don’t have a lack of data, we have a lack of listening.
When women describe pain, the system translates it into exaggeration. When they ask for options, they get the same recycled advice: “Go on the pill.”
The medical model still treats menstruation as a niche, not a vital sign.
And that’s why listening matters. Because until we treat lived experience as evidence, we’ll keep designing systems that ignore reality.
Learning from Lived Experience
As founders, practitioners, and advocates, we often talk about innovation, new tech, better diagnostics, smarter apps. But innovation without empathy is just noise.
Listening to eight women share their stories of endometriosis, PCOS, and PMDD reminded me of something fundamental: we can’t fix what we refuse to feel.
It takes courage to speak about periods, pain, infertility, and loss in a room full of professionals.
Yet these women did, not because they wanted sympathy, but because they wanted change.
Their words carried a collective message: “We don’t need to be fixed, we need to be heard.”
The Change We Need
So, what would change actually look like?
- Menstrual health education in medical schools.
Not as a module, but as a mainstream subject. Every GP, nurse, and specialist should understand menstrual health the way they understand blood pressure. - Inclusive menopause and menstrual support, for all ages, all bodies.
Menstrual and menopausal health should not be separate conversations. Hormonal health spans a lifetime. - Accessible care at every level.
Support should start at the local pharmacy, not five years into a diagnosis journey. Pharmacists and primary care teams can be the first line of empathy and intervention. - Private and public health insurance that covers menstrual conditions.
No woman should have to choose between financial stability and pain management. - Policy change that protects and respects women’s health.
We need national recognition that menstrual health is not a luxury — it’s a basic human right.
What Listening Really Means
Listening is not passive. It’s radical.
It means staying in the discomfort of someone else’s pain long enough to see the system that caused it. It means asking, not assuming. It means holding space before we offer solutions.
The Menstrual Health Project event reminded me that we can’t rely on numbers alone. Data gives us proof. Stories give us purpose. And when you combine both, that’s when transformation begins.
Why WUKA Cares
At WUKA, we started with period underwear, but what we’re really building is period equity.
Every conversation, campaign, and product we create is rooted in one belief: women deserve better.
Better care. Better education. Better respect.
Because menstrual health is not a side issue. It’s a social justice issue. It’s about the right to live without shame, without silence, and without suffering that’s dismissed as “normal.”
If you’re someone living with any of this, endometriosis, PCOS, PMDD, or anything that makes you feel unseen, I see you. You are not alone. You deserve better, and we will keep fighting for you.
Let’s listen louder. Let’s care deeper. Let’s make menstrual health mainstream.
With you always,
Ruby x
Founder & CEO, WUKA
P.S. Check out the incredible work of the Menstrual Health Project. They’re not just raising awareness, they’re rebuilding the narrative.
- News2 weeks ago
FDA plans to revise black box warning on menopause hormone therapies
- News2 weeks ago
AI-powered women’s health companion Nexus launches in UK
- News2 weeks ago
Scientists turn human skin cells into eggs in IVF breakthrough
- News6 days ago
Women’s health innovations recognised in TIME’s Best Inventions 2025
- Hormonal health2 weeks ago
Daily pill could delay menopause ‘by years,’ study finds
- News2 weeks ago
Ancient herb to modern must-have: Why ashwagandha is capturing UK women’s attention
- Menopause3 weeks ago
New report exposes perimenopause as biggest blind spot in women’s health
- News1 week ago
Menstrual cycle affects women’s reaction time, study finds