Connect with us

Insight

How to remain successful in the tough world of FemTech

By Gloria Kolb, Co-Founder & CEO – Elitone

Published

on

It is well documented that FemTech companies, often founded and run by females, face a tougher uphill battle to get investment. Sadly, there is a continuing, historical negative bias towards female-founded and female-led companies, as highlighted by female founders in Forbes last year. 

Accessing investment and capital is the first hurdle, which often faces blatant sexism by male-dominant investors and VCs, market misconceptions and a stigma attached to female-led enterprises.

But, the challenge doesn’t stop when funding is secured.

Notwithstanding the fact that we are finally starting to have open, honest and supportive discussions around topics that affect women, including birth, menstruation, gynaecological issues, menopause and pelvic health, amongst others, female founders are still not experiencing the same support when starting or running businesses that their male counterparts benefit from.

Like every business, the challenge becomes about growing a company that is financially and operationally viable for the long term, whilst staying relevant to consumers.

But that can be even harder if you’re not given the same level of support needed.

Despite the FemTech sector’s huge growth in recent years, the appetite for funding is still missing.

In my experience many investors assume the market is saturated due to the number of products and struggle to understand and distinguish between the various FemTech solutions. 

It’s clear that female-founded and FemTech companies do well to actually get off the ground, and thereafter it’s the way these companies navigate producing relevant, effective and desired products, whilst successfully balancing the financial accounts, that is the difference between success and failure in the long-term.

The journey Elvie has experienced is an example of the challenges faced in FemTech.

It started as one of the most well-known, trailblazing sector businesses in the UK in 2013, with its ‘taboo-busting’ pelvic floor trainer.

It later launched the Elvie Pump, a fully in-bra breast pump, in 2018, and most recently pivoted its product offering to launch a bassinet.

Elvie was initially a start-up success story; since its launch raising in excess of $186 million in investment, however, recent sales figures were declining whilst debts were rising.

The good news for the sector is that Willow, the San Francisco start-up that made its name with wearable breast pumps, is acquiring Elvie.

But the question remains, how did a first-of-its-kind FemTech company go so wrong? The investment was there, so was it a lack of financial and operating diligence that caused it to fall?

In the female pelvic floor space alone, Viveve, which raised $113M was delisted from Nasdaq in 2023 when it failed to meet its incontinence endpoints, Incontrol Medical, which was the first to bring pelvic floor health to the home, folded shortly after the pandemic, and Liberty filed for bankruptcy.

So what lessons can be learnt? Why is it so difficult for FemTech hardware companies to succeed? 

Firstly, more education is needed around the issues females face that result in the development of FemTech hardware. Education is tricky in today’s society.

Things are slowly changing on the back of the conversation opening up in recent years on menstruation and menopause, but there is still a long way to go and female conditions such as incontinence and bladder leaking are still somewhat taboo, embarrassing and not spoken about often enough in mainstream or on social media. 

What’s more, what I have found while developing Elitone is that the issue of incontinence, pelvic health and bladder leaks is often a secret for those that experience it.

The desire to keep it hidden, without discussing with friends, family or the medical profession, exacerbates the lack of awareness and understanding around the condition.

People are ashamed, but don’t need to be.

Elitone is on a mission to ensure women feel empowered to speak about what can become a huge affliction.

I started the company precisely because I was suffering post-partum and couldn’t find effective solutions on the market. 

We work hard to evolve and grow Elitone, to ensure there will always be a reliable, effective and accessible solution for the millions of women who suffer.

The way we do this is to ensure our financial and operational management is solid and provides the basis for continued success. 

At one point, start-ups were told “grow fast or die”, or scale at any cost and worry about profitability later.

That may well work for software and internet-based products, but by definition FemTech is hardware and we believe that approach doesn’t work.

Our success is based on old-fashioned common sense; we are careful about our costs, we are quick to shut down marketing efforts that don’t show returns, and everything is a test first.

We already know Femtech is harder to get funded, so every dollar counts.

So, although our growth has been slower than some others, the real secret to success is creating a product that is truly loved and works!

— Gloria Kolb is the CEO and co-founder of Elitone, the first non-invasive, FDA-cleared, wearable treatment for women with urinary incontinence. 

Elitone’s accolades include winning Best New Product by My Face My Body, Sling Shot, finalist in Women Startup Challenge, and CES’ Innovation Award. As an inventor with 30+ patents and advocate for women’s health, Gloria has been featured in Forbes as a Top Scientist Driving Innovation in Women’s Health, TechRound’s Top Women in Tech, Boston’s “40 Under 40” and MIT Review’s “World’s Top Innovators under 35.”

She has engineering degrees from MIT and Stanford, and an Entrepreneurship MBA from Babson College.

Insight

GSK ovarian and womb cancer drug shows promise in early trial

Published

on

GSK said its ovarian cancer drug shrank or cleared tumours in more than 60 per cent of patients in an early trial as CCO Luke Miels pushes faster development.

The company said that in an early-stage trial, Mocertatug Rezetecan, known as Mo-Rez, shrank or eliminated tumours in 62 per cent of patients with ovarian cancer after chemotherapy had failed, and in 67 per cent of those with endometrial cancer.

Hesham Abdullah, GSK’s global head of cancer research and development, said: “Treatment of gynaecological cancers remains a major challenge, with a pressing need for new therapies that offer improved response rates.

“With Mo-Rez we now have compelling evidence of a promising clinical profile.”

GSK acquired the Mo-Rez treatment, an antibody-drug conjugate, from China’s Hansoh Pharma in late 2023 and has trialled it in 224 patients around the world, including the UK, over the past year.

Only a few patients needed to stop treatment because of side effects, the most common being nausea.

It is given every three weeks by intravenous infusion, meaning directly into a vein.

Combined with data from a separate intermediate trial in China, the results have given the British drugmaker the confidence to go straight to late-stage trials, with five clinical studies planned globally in the next few months, including on patients in the UK.

Speaking to journalists before the conference, Abdullah described Mo-Rez as a “key asset” in the company’s growing cancer portfolio.

It is expected to be a blockbuster drug, with peak annual sales of more than £2bn, which GSK hopes will help it achieve its 2031 sales target of £40bn.

A few years ago GSK did not have any cancer drugs on the market, but it now has four approved medicines and 13 in clinical development.

Last year, oncology generated nearly £2bn in sales, up 43 per cent from 2024, with sales of its endometrial cancer drug Jemperli rising 89 per cent.

Continue Reading

News

Self-employment linked to better cardiovascular health outcomes in Hispanic women

Published

on

Self-employment is linked to lower rates of high blood pressure, obesity, diabetes, poor health and binge drinking in Hispanic women, research suggests.

The findings, published in the peer-reviewed journal Ethnicity & Disease, suggest work structure may be related to cardiovascular disease risk among this group.

Dr Kimberly Narain is assistant professor of medicine in the division of general internal medicine and health services research at the David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, senior author of the study, and director of health services and health optimisation research for the Iris Cantor-UCLA Women’s Health Center.

She said: “Hispanic women experience a disproportionate burden of heart disease compared to non-Hispanic women. This is the first study to link the structure of work with risks for heart disease among this group of women.”

The researchers examined 2003 to 2022 data from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System to assess the association between self-employment, cardiovascular disease risk factors and health outcomes for Hispanic women.

The data included 165,600 Hispanic working women. Of those, about 21,000, or 13 per cent, were self-employed rather than working for wages or a salary.

Overall, the researchers found that self-employed women were less likely to report cardiovascular-disease-associated health problems.

They were also about 11 per cent more likely to report exercising compared with their non-self-employed counterparts.

Specifically, they found that self-employed Hispanic women had a 1.7 percentage point lower chance of reporting diabetes, roughly a 23 per cent decline.

They also had a 3.3 percentage point lower chance of reporting hypertension, roughly a 17 per cent decline.

The study also found a 5.9 percentage point lower chance of reporting obesity, roughly a 15 per cent decline.

It found a 2.0 percentage point lower chance of reporting binge drinking, roughly a 2 per cent decline.

It also found a 2.5 percentage point lower chance of reporting poor or fair overall health, roughly a 13 per cent decline.

The relationship between heart disease risks and the structure of work among Hispanic women was not driven by access to healthcare or differences in income, Narain said.

In fact, the decrease in high blood pressure linked to self-employment was nearly as large as the decrease in high blood pressure linked to being in the highest income group.

The study has some limitations.

The researchers relied on self-reported outcomes, which might be less reliable among ethnic and racial minorities and those from a lower socioeconomic background.

In addition, the researchers’ definition of poor mental health does not entirely match the accepted definition in the fifth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders.

They also did not have data allowing them to examine the specific types of occupations held by the women.

The study design also cannot prove any causal relationship between self-employment and cardiovascular disease risk, which is a subject the researchers will explore.

“The next step in the research is to conduct studies that are able to better assess if the structure of work is a cause of higher heart disease risks among Hispanic women.”

Narain said this.

Study co-authors are Lisette Collins, who led the research, and Dr Frederick Ferguson of UCLA.

Grants from the Iris Cantor-UCLA Women’s Health Center-Leichtman-Levine-TEM program and the UCLA National Clinician Scholars Program supported the research.

Continue Reading

Insight

Working from home linked to higher fertility, research finds

Published

on

Working from home is linked to 0.32 more children per woman when both partners do it at least once a week, research across 38 countries suggests.

The study found that among working adults aged 20 to 45, estimated lifetime fertility, meaning children already born or fathered plus plans for future children, rises when one or both partners work remotely.

In the US, the increase was even higher at 0.45 children per woman.

On average, women whose partners did not work from home had 2.26 children.

When the woman worked from home at least one day a week, this rose to 2.48. When both partners did so, it increased to 2.58.

If the man worked from home at least one day a week, the increase was more limited at 2.36 children.

The research, by Steven J. Davis and colleagues and published as a working paper by the National Bureau of Economic Research, points to three possible explanations.

Remote working may make it easier to balance childcare with paid work, leading some couples to have more children.

Families with children may also be more likely to look for remote roles. Or the growing availability of those roles may lift fertility by opening up more parent-friendly jobs.

“All three stories align with the idea that WFH jobs make it easier for parents to combine child rearing and employment,” the report suggests.

The pattern held both after the pandemic, between 2023 and 2025, and before it, between 2017 and 2019.

The implications for national fertility rates vary mainly because working-from-home rates differ widely between countries.

Among workers aged 20 to 45, the share working from home at least one day a week ranges from 21 per cent in Japan to 60 per cent in Vietnam. The UK ranks third globally and leads Europe at 54 per cent.

The report estimates that, if “interpreted causally”, remote working accounts for 8.1 per cent of US fertility, equal to about 291,000 births a year as of 2024.

The researchers note that while this may sound modest, it is larger than the effect of government spending on early childhood care and education in the US.

“Bringing WFH rates to the levels that currently prevail in the United States, United Kingdom, and Canada has the potential to materially boost fertility in many other countries,” the report suggests.

However, the research cautions against broad policy approaches, saying the desire for remote work varies widely between individuals, and that it is not practical in every job or organisation.

“Thus, policy interventions that push for a one-size-fits-all approach to working arrangements are likely to yield unhappier workers and lower productivity,” it warns.

A UK Parliament report has also found that remote and hybrid work can boost employment, with parents, carers and people with disabilities likely to benefit most from more flexible working options.

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025 Aspect Health Media Ltd. All Rights Reserved.