Connect with us

Motherhood

Age, economic status and religiosity drive LGB patients to grow families, study suggests

Published

on

Age, economic status, number of children and religiosity — are the key predictors of LGB parents’ desire to expand their families, new research has found.

In contrast to the findings of previous studies, experiences of discrimination, stigma, and social support were not found to have a significant impact on parental aspirations.

The researchers now aim to further explore the reasons behind these findings.

 

The research team explored the desire, intention, and assessment of the likelihood of having additional children among LGB individuals who are already parents.

The study is the first to focus on the motivations for family expansion among LGB parents.

It examined three measures of parental aspirations — desire, intention, and estimated probability — in the context of parenthood achieved through fertility treatments.

Dr Geva Shenkman Lachberg, is from the Dina Recanati School of Medicine.

The researcher said: “The current study is particularly relevant in the Israeli context — a country that reveres childbirth and parenthood, with one of the highest average numbers of children among OECD countries.

“Israel is also known for its widespread use of assisted reproductive technologies and generous government funding, including nearly unlimited cycles of fertility treatment.

“Within this ‘parenting empire’, it is important to understand what motivates LGB parents to have more children — especially given the significant challenges they have faced over the years, such as restrictions on surrogacy in Israel.”

The study included 234 LGB parents with an average age of 40.23, surveyed between November 2022 and February 2024.

Participants completed questionnaires addressing a wide range of factors that may influence the motivation to have additional children.

The variables examined included sociodemographic characteristics (parent’s age, gender, education level, economic status, religiosity, marital status, number of children, and place of residence); factors related to perceptions of the parental role (investment in parenting, satisfaction with parenting, sense of parental competence, and parental integration); social variables (social support, experiences of discrimination, and stigma); as well as a cultural variable — pronatalism, which reflects sociocultural values ​​that encourage childbirth and parenthood.

As one of the first studies to examine motivations for having additional children among LGB parents, the researchers based their hypotheses on previous findings from studies conducted among LGB individuals who were not yet parents.

These earlier studies found that, alongside sociodemographic variables, social factors also had a significant impact.

For example, non-parent LGB individuals who experienced lower levels of social support and higher levels of stigma and discrimination reported lower desire and intention to become parents.

Accordingly, the researchers hypothesised that similar patterns would emerge among LGB parents — that exposure to stigma and discrimination or a lack of social support would be associated with decreased motivation to expand their families.

However, contrary to the initial hypothesis and previous findings from studies of non-parent LGB individuals, the current study found that only sociodemographic factors were significant predictors of motivation for additional children.

Younger parental age, fewer existing children, higher economic status, and greater religiosity were the only variables found to be associated with the desire, intention, and estimated likelihood of bringing additional children into the world.

In contrast, social support, stigma, discrimination, perceptions of the parental role, and pronatalist attitudes were not found to be significantly linked with aspirations for family expansion, once sociodemographic variables were accounted for within the statistical prediction model.

Lachberg said: “While previous studies have highlighted the impact of stigma, discrimination, and lack of social support on parenthood aspirations among sexual minorities, it seems that these factors carry less weight among LGB parents.

“It may be that after they have succeeded in becoming parents — effectively breaking the glass ceiling — they are accepted into the social consensus, and it is the sociodemographic factors that remain significant.

“In this sense, the emerging picture closely resembles the one we are familiar with among heterosexual parents.”

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Pregnancy

Women’s health strategy a ‘missed opportunity,’ RCM says

Published

on

The Royal College of Midwives (RCM) has referred to the women’s health strategy as a ‘missed opportunity’ to address maternity services. 

The renewed strategy was released by the government this week, with the aim of putting women’s experiences at the centre of care and ensuring they are “better heard and served”.

However, the government stated that because of ongoing investigations into maternity services across the country, the strategy “does not seek to address safety in maternity and neonatal services”.

The RCM described this as a “missed opportunity” and urged the government to ensure that, following the inquiries, maternity is placed “at the very heart” of the strategy.

Gill Walton, RCM chief executive, said the college was “deeply disappointed” that maternity services “do not feature as a headline priority” in the renewed strategy.

She said: “This is a significant missed opportunity and one that is very difficult to understand.

“Pregnancy, birth and the postnatal period are not a footnote in women’s health – they are one of the most significant and consequential phases of a woman’s life.

“A strategy that treats maternity as an afterthought is not truly a women’s health strategy at all. It is exactly the kind of thinking that has allowed maternity services to reach the point they are at today.”

Walton acknowledged that the strategy contained commitments on ensuring women’s voices shape their care, on supporting families through pregnancy loss and on the principle that services should be held accountable when they fail to listen to women.

She added: “But a strategy that addresses one part of women’s health while leaving maternity care behind is only doing half the job.”

Walton urged the government to ensure that this is addressed when the ongoing investigations into maternity care conclude, with any recommendations placed “at the very heart of this strategy with the seriousness and urgency that women, families and midwives deserve”.

In the foreword to the renewed plans, health and social care secretary Wes Streeting referred to the ongoing independent National Maternity and Neonatal Investigation as action being taken by the government to improve safety in maternity services.

The strategy also refers to the new National Maternity and Neonatal Taskforce, chaired by Streeting, which aims to help deliver “safer, more equitable care” for women, babies and families.

The foreword said that, because of ongoing initiatives, it was “important that this work continues without restriction and that the government can properly respond to the findings”.

It added: “This renewed women’s health strategy therefore does not seek to address safety in maternity and neonatal services other than that related to women’s health before and during pregnancy and the actions we are taking immediately to improve maternity and neonatal care.”

The strategy does, however, include plans to prioritise health education in schools, communities and healthcare settings to “empower women” with the “knowledge and tools they need to help control their fertility” and “prepare for the best pregnancy outcomes.

It also promises to provide women with access to “safe and high-quality contraception, abortion care, fertility services, preconception care and support after pregnancy loss in convenient settings.

Continue Reading

Motherhood

Scotland to publish dedicated miscarriage patient charter

Published

on

Scotland is set to publish the UK’s first dedicated miscarriage patient charter, giving women and families clear information on NHS care and support.

Commissioned by the Scottish Government and developed with baby-loss charities Tommy’s, Held In Our Hearts and the Miscarriage Association, the charter sets out minimum standards for compassionate, clinically appropriate and culturally competent miscarriage care across Scotland.

It builds on the Scottish Government’s Delivery Framework for Miscarriage Care, which has already changed practice across NHS boards.

Jenni Minto, Scottish public health and women’s health minister, said: “Miscarriage is devastating, and for too long women have not had the care and support they deserve.

“That is changing. Scotland will become the first country in the UK to publish a miscarriage patient charter, meaning women know exactly how they will be supported by health services following their loss.”

Unlike previous UK-wide norms, where women were typically offered enhanced support only after three miscarriages, Scotland’s approach means women can receive appropriate support after their first miscarriage.

The charter also sets out clear rights and expectations so every woman, regardless of location or circumstance, understands the care she should receive.

It includes access to private rooms in hospitals rather than busy clinical areas or maternity settings, progesterone treatment where clinically appropriate, compassionate and culturally competent bereavement support, and clear information in 18 languages, including British Sign Language and audio formats.

Progesterone is a hormone that growing evidence suggests may help reduce the risk of miscarriage in certain cases when given to women who meet specific clinical criteria.

The Scottish Government said the charter is designed to ensure personalised, respectful care and to address long-standing inequalities experienced by women during miscarriage.

It is intended to provide clarity on the support women can expect, consistent standards across all NHS boards, stronger awareness and confidence among healthcare professionals, and better access to emotional and practical support services.

Charities involved in its development said many women still report feeling dismissed, uninformed or unsupported during miscarriage.

They said the new charter marks an important step towards making sure every woman feels heard, respected and cared for.

The charter aligns with Scotland’s wider Women’s Health Plan, which is improving care across reproductive, menstrual, maternal and perinatal health.

Recent national developments include greater investment in women’s health services, improved training for healthcare staff, new digital and in-person support tools, and targeted action to reduce inequalities in access and outcomes.

Together, these measures aim to create a more compassionate and equitable women’s health system.

Minto said: “This charter is a landmark moment.

“It tells women clearly what they should expect from their NHS, and it holds services to account for delivering it.

“Scotland is leading the way, and I am proud of the progress NHS boards and our charity partners have made together.”

The model is expected to inform wider UK discussions on miscarriage support, bereavement care and early pregnancy services.

The charter will be made publicly available, offering women, partners and families clear guidance on their rights and the standards they can expect when seeking care.

Continue Reading

Motherhood

The maternity care crisis hiding in plain sight

Published

on

By Adrianne Nickerson, founder and CEO, Oula

The numbers get the headlines. Maternal mortality rates. Access deserts. Workforce shortages. These are real and urgent problems, but they’re not the whole story.

There’s a quieter breakdown happening inside routine appointments, and it’s driving outcomes in ways that never show up in formal reports.

Women describe maternity care that feels rushed and transactional.

They talk about repeating their medical history at every visit, leaving appointments with questions they never got to ask, and receiving advice so generic it doesn’t seem to account for their actual lives.

These aren’t just complaints about bedside manner. They’re signals that the system is losing the thread, and when that happens, clinical risk follows.

A patient who doesn’t feel heard may decide a new symptom isn’t worth mentioning.

A patient who leaves an appointment without clear next steps may wait too long to call when something changes. These small moments of disconnection are where complications quietly take shape.

The system is structured to rush

This isn’t about individual clinicians failing women. It’s about a care model built around short, physician-led visits with limited coordination across roles — applied to pregnancies that are often medically and emotionally complex.

Clinicians are covering more ground in less time, and patients feel that compression. Women in marginalised communities feel it most acutely.

Reports of dismissal and bias are well-documented, and the consequences compound: when trust erodes, communication breaks down, and the window for early intervention narrows.

What women are actually asking for

Younger women in particular are entering maternity care with different expectations. They want explanations for recommendations, not just instructions.

They want to understand tradeoffs and have their preferences carry forward from one visit to the next. They’re not looking to reduce medical oversight, they’re looking for care that makes sense as a whole.

That’s driving real interest in collaborative care models that bring OBs, midwives, nurses, and behavioural health professionals into a coordinated framework.

When roles are clear and communication is shared rather than siloed, the experience changes, and so do outcomes.

Experience is clinical performance

Health systems are sophisticated at tracking infection rates and readmissions. The experience of care deserves the same level of attention, because it’s often where the clinical picture first starts to slip.

The fixes aren’t mysterious. A longer first visit can prevent confusion that compounds over months. Integrated mental health support surfaces concerns that might otherwise go unspoken.

Clear communication across the care team eliminates the mixed messages that erode confidence.

Postpartum services like pelvic floor therapy and lactation support – when easy to access and clearly explained – extend the impact of care well beyond delivery.

Workforce shortages and financial pressure make all of this harder. They also make it more urgent.

When women feel respected and informed, they raise concerns earlier, follow care plans more consistently, and seek help sooner.

That’s not a soft outcome – that’s how complications get prevented.

Simply put: adjusting how care is delivered is one of the most direct ways to improve clinical outcomes.

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025 Aspect Health Media Ltd. All Rights Reserved.