Connect with us

Pregnancy

Crisis pregnancy centres warned off ectopic scans

Published

on

A lawsuit settlement in Massachusetts over alleged medical harm at a crisis pregnancy centre is prompting new legal guidance for faith-based clinics across the US.

Crisis pregnancy centres are now being advised not to perform ultrasounds on women with suspected ectopic pregnancies – a potentially life-threatening condition where an embryo implants outside the womb – and instead refer them to emergency care.

The advice was shared during a panel discussion hosted by the National Institute of Family and Life Advocates (NIFLA), a group that provides legal and medical support to crisis pregnancy centres.

Lawyers urged centres to avoid scanning women reporting symptoms.

One lawyer said during the recorded session: “Just as I’m walking down here I had a call from a centre.

“They had a woman come in who was cramping, and she said on a scale of 1 to 10, it was just below a 6. And I’m like, yikes, like, I wouldn’t scan her.”

The lawyer said the appropriate response in such cases is to send the client directly to the emergency department.

NIFLA has previously issued similar guidance.

A 2018 document states that “if a patient has symptoms of an ectopic pregnancy or miscarriage, she will not be offered an ultrasound exam and is advised, verbally and in writing, to immediately obtain medical care.”

Although NIFLA did not represent Clearway Clinic in the Massachusetts case, the centre was listed as a NIFLA member in 2023.

NIFLA has previously represented crisis pregnancy centres in high-profile cases, including a 2018 US Supreme Court case in California that resulted in a First Amendment ruling in their favour.

Crisis pregnancy centres are religiously affiliated organisations that provide free pregnancy tests and ultrasounds, typically with the aim of discouraging abortion, according to the American College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists.

They have been criticised for presenting themselves as comprehensive reproductive health clinics while following an ideological rather than clinical model of care, according to a paper in the American Medical Association Journal of Ethics.

During the NIFLA panel, lawyers and a participating doctor advised against scanning women with symptoms of possible ectopic pregnancy, particularly in cases involving low levels of human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG) – a hormone produced by the placenta in early pregnancy.

Low or slowly rising HCG levels may indicate miscarriage or ectopic pregnancy.

The doctor said: “I’m not scanning. If you’ve got a level that’s low like that, it could be early pregnancy, but that is one of the cardinal signs of ectopic and one of the cardinal signs of miscarriage, slowly rising HCG.

“Please do not. She’s already got a provider. Dump it back on them.”

“She should be going back to her provider,” a legal representative added.

Andrea Swartzendruber, a researcher who studies crisis pregnancy centres, described the advice as a significant shift.

She said: “That seems like a very marked change, especially given that so many CPCs are using fear around ectopic pregnancy as a reason to come in and get scanned.”

The panel also addressed privacy concerns.

While many centres claim to be “HIPAA-compliant”, they are not legally bound by the US Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA), which applies only to specific healthcare entities.

One lawyer said: “There’s this movement not to say HIPAA, and I just finally got everybody to spell it right. So I’m kind of upset.

“We want you to abide by those policies, but don’t advertise yourself as HIPAA-compliant.”

Debra Rosen, executive director of Reproductive Health and Freedom Watch, said this approach can be misleading.

Rosen said: “Unregulated pregnancy clinics masquerade as medical facilities, are not covered entities under HIPAA, and for decades have vigorously pushed back against even the most basic forms of accountability.

“Women nationwide face real harms as these fringe clinics trap them between illusions of confidentiality and the actual legal protections they receive.

“This dangerous gap demands legislative action.”

Insight

New pregnancy treatment shows promise for at-risk twins

Published

on

A high-powered ultrasound treatment could help identical twins affected by a rare and serious condition during early pregnancy, an initial study suggests.

Twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome, or TTTS, causes uneven blood flow between identical twins who share a placenta.

The imbalance can leave one baby dangerously small and the other too large, putting both babies’ survival at risk.

 

Brioney Garrett’s daughters were in danger before doctors used the world-first treatment to seal the blood vessels causing the problem without an operation.

Nancy and Margo were born healthy and, now aged four, are due to start school.

Researchers from Queen Charlotte’s and Chelsea Hospital tested the non-invasive procedure in 10 women from the UK and elsewhere in Europe after scans detected TTTS during early pregnancy.

Five women needed further treatment, while 12 of the 20 babies survived following the procedure.

The researchers described having a treatment that did not require a needle or telescope to be inserted into the mother’s abdomen as “extremely exciting”.

However, they said larger studies involving more pregnant women were needed before the procedure could be offered more widely.

Garrett described her daughters as “my miracle twins”.

She said: “We were in a very dire situation and I don’t forget that.

“It stays with me always how things could have been. Every day I still count my blessings.”

TTTS affects between 10 and 15 per cent of identical twins who share a placenta, representing around 300 to 400 pregnancies in the UK each year.

The uneven blood flow causes excess fluid to build up around the larger recipient baby, while leaving dangerously little fluid around the smaller donor baby.

Treatment usually involves inserting a needle into the womb to drain some of the fluid or using a laser to seal the connecting blood vessels.

Garrett’s procedure took about 20 minutes. She lay flat while a specially designed machine directed high-powered ultrasound waves at small blood vessels in her placenta.

She said: “It was very quick and pretty painless.”

Christoph Lees, head of fetal medicine at Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust and professor of obstetrics at Imperial College London, described the research as “very promising”.

He said: “If this could work in a fully-fledged study, it could give hope to a lot of women who otherwise might have to have quite invasive treatment.”

Ultrasound is commonly used during medical scans to produce images of the body, but this procedure uses much more focused waves.

Heat generated by the waves can seal blood vessels about 2mm in diameter and located around 5cm to 6cm beneath the skin.

The procedure blocked blood flow in 90 per cent of the vessels treated during the study, with no unwanted side-effects reported.

Twins Trust, which supported the study, said the approach could make a significant difference for families affected by TTTS.

Helen Peck, head of healthcare engagement and research, said: “Any procedure that is non-invasive and can potentially identify TTTS earlier and improve outcomes for our families with this life-threatening condition could be a turning point.”

Scans carried out weeks after Garrett’s procedure showed that blood flow between the babies had been rebalanced, although other problems developed during the pregnancy.

Garrett said Margo, who had too little fluid around her, “was in a much better position” and that “the strain on Nancy’s heart had eased”.

Nancy and Margo were born at nearly 34 weeks, weighing 3lb 7oz and 3lb 3oz respectively.

Garrett said: “They were both healthy, and Margo wasn’t as small as we worried she was going to be.”

The twins are due to start primary school in September.

Garrett said: “They’re funny, smart, energetic little girls that just fit right in with their age group.”

Continue Reading

Pregnancy

New reporting tool targets maternal-fetal teams as pregnancy complexity rises

Published

on

A new reporting tool built specifically for obstetrics and maternal-fetal medicine has launched, aimed at teams managing increasingly complex pregnancies with limited time and resources.

Trice Imaging has released Trice Workspace Reporting, which connects imaging, reporting and longitudinal patient data in a single workflow to support faster clinical decision making.

Birth rates are falling worldwide, but pregnancies are getting more complicated. Advanced maternal age, IVF-assisted pregnancies, rising obesity rates and a higher prevalence of hypertension and diabetes mean more cases now require specialist monitoring, advanced imaging and multidisciplinary care.

At the same time, clinical teams are stretched and facing growing administrative demands.

Trice Workspace Reporting brings together customisable reporting, dynamic pregnancy dating and longitudinal patient history with an AI-ready, EHR-interoperable infrastructure, all inside the company’s Tricefy image management platform.

The company says it aims to accelerate standardised and synchronised report turnaround, support timely clinical decisions and improve operational efficiency for fetal medicine services.

“Maternal fetal medicine teams are managing increasingly complex pregnancies while being asked to do more with limited time and resources,” said Mark A. Samii, chief revenue officer at Trice Imaging.

“Trice Workspace Reporting is designed to remove unnecessary friction from reporting by creating a structured digital foundation that supports today’s need for connected clinical workflows.

“It also provides a digital foundation as practices prepare for tomorrow and the evolution of AI-enabled fetal assessment, anomaly detection and outcome prediction technologies.”

Trice Imaging describes its mission as transforming the women’s health journey by connecting physicians, patients and healthcare systems. From independent practices to large hospital ecosystems, it aims to reach the entire women’s health continuum, spanning IVF and reproductive health, maternal-fetal medicine and OB/GYN, and onwards to lifelong women’s health.

For more than 17 years the firm has worked on cloud-based storage, retrieval, display, organisation and exchange of ultrasound medical images and associated information across health environments.

Its wider platform now extends to dynamic clinical reporting, AI-driven workflow optimisation, data analytics and secure patient engagement.

Trice Imaging holds regulatory and data protection clearances in 40 countries. It has offices in Miami and Stockholm, alongside a growing network of global distributors.

Continue Reading

Opinion

Women’s Health has waited long enough for innovation

Published

on

By Dr Fran Conti-Ramsden, clinician at Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, academic at King’s College London, and chief medical officer of MEGI Health.

A woman gives birth. A few days later she goes home, often with a bag of medication for her blood pressure, and then, very often, very little structured follow-up for her heart (cardiovascular) health.

In my clinical work, and through our collaboration with Action on Pre-eclampsia, I see and hear about this postnatal cliff edge again and again, and it still shocks me.

We invest a lot of medical care and attention whilst a woman or birthing individual is pregnant, then, at the very moment emerging evidence suggests we have a window of opportunity to modify long-term health, the support falls away.

That cliff edge is a symptom of a deeper issue: we have come to treat “women’s health” as a synonym for reproductive health. Pregnancy, periods and fertility, important as they are, have crowded out everything else.

Yet the conditions that do most to shorten and limit women’s lives are not reproductive at all.

Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death in women worldwide, and it is still too readily thought of as a man’s problem.

Heart disease in women is more likely to be missed and under-treated, in part because for decades women were under-represented in the research that built our knowledge.

Pregnancy makes this vivid.

Conditions such as pre-eclampsia are not only risks to be managed for nine months; they are early warnings about a woman’s future, markers that she is more likely to develop heart disease and high blood pressure in the years to come.

We have the knowledge to act on that. What we mostly do instead is discharge her and look away.

This is exactly the kind of problem better tools should help us solve: spotting risk earlier, supporting women and their clinicians through the vulnerable postnatal window, and providing continuity where the system currently provides a drop due to lack of capacity.

Artificial intelligence and digital health have real potential here; in risk prediction, in monitoring blood pressure at home, and in helping stretched clinicians know who needs attention and when.

And yet this is not where most of the energy is going.

It is far easier to build, fund and scale an app that tracks a cycle than a tool that changes the trajectory of a woman’s heart.

So, innovation clusters at the lighter, lower-risk end of innovation, while the conditions that actually kill and disable women, and moments like the postnatal cliff, stay under-served.

Closing the women’s health gap could add at least a trillion dollars to the global economy each year, the World Economic Forum estimates, but the bigger prize is women living longer, healthier lives.

None of this means technology is a cure in itself. It is a tool, and a tool built carelessly can do harm.

Because women have been under-represented in medical data, systems trained on that data can quietly carry the same blind spots forward, deepening inequalities rather than closing them.

Responsible innovation, with clinical-grade evidence, privacy and equity designed in from the start, and tools built around real clinical pathways rather than bolted on afterwards, is not a brake on progress.

It is the only version of progress worth having.

I am optimistic, because a serious community is forming around exactly these questions and the appetite to get it right is real.

It is why, at MEGI, we are bringing clinicians, researchers, founders, regulators and investors together for our AI × Women’s Health summit on 25 June.

If we keep our focus on the conditions that matter most to women’s lives, and build the tools to meet them responsibly, the postnatal cliff edge could become something else entirely: the moment the system finally catches her and delivers preventative healthcare.

AI × Women’s Health: Innovation, Challenges and Opportunities summit is taking place on Thursday 25 June 2026 at the London Institute for Healthcare Engineering. The event is free and is fully booked and operating a waiting list. Join the waiting list here.

About Dr Fran Conti-Ramsden

Dr Fran Conti-Ramsden is a UK Obstetrics and Gynaecology registrar and Chadburn Clinical Lecturer at KCL passionate about transforming women’s health through technology and innovation.

Combining NHS clinical experience with an MRC-funded PhD, recent NHS Clinical AI fellowship and commercial role as Chief Medical Officer at Megi health, she works at the intersection of clinical medicine, data science, technology and AI.

Her current programme of research focuses on the intersection of healthcare and technology; leveraging advances such as smartphone based vital signs capture and large language models to drive forward scalable innovation in maternal cardiovascular care.

She has published over 20 peer-reviewed manuscripts (See gScholar, h-index 12), including award-winning work recognized by Hypertension Journal.

She was awarded an AI visionary award in 2025 by Health Innovation KSS was the recipient of the 2024 International Society for the Study of Hypertension in Pregnancy Zuspan prize.

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025 Aspect Health Media Ltd. All Rights Reserved.