Mental health
Breaking barriers: Advancing women’s health with innovation and leadership
By Dr Zia Khan, MD and Dr Keith Berkle, MD, MBA
The conversation around healthcare is evolving, with a shift towards a value-based care (VBC) model that aims to address long-standing gaps in care and create a system where healthcare is driven by patient outcomes and quality services.
Yet, one vital area remains ripe – and too often, overlooked – for transformation in VBC: women’s health.
To truly revolutionise women’s health, it’s critical that we empower physicians, and OB/GYNs particularly, with the tools and leadership resources necessary to champion VBC.
By doing so, we can create a future for women’s healthcare that is truly tailored to the unique needs of women, by being outcome-driven and patient-centered.
Transitioning to value-based care models in women’s health presents unique challenges that require innovative solutions.
Unlike primary care, where standardized measures and reimbursement models are well-established, women’s health often lacks these benchmarks.
Metrics such as C-section rates and timely initiation of prenatal care are fraught with variability, making it difficult to fairly assess and reward OB/GYN practices for quality care.
To address these challenges, healthcare organisations are increasingly leveraging technology to enhance care delivery.
Solutions like remote monitoring and telehealth provide OB/GYNs with the tools needed to deliver quality, value-driven care tailored to women’s unique needs.
Integrating these solutions with existing Electronic Medical Record (EMR) systems also helps to ensure that critical patient information is accessible, enabling informed decision-making and timely interventions that are crucial for positive health outcomes.
Beyond technological innovations, the recognition that leadership plays a pivotal role in driving change is central to advance a successful transformation.
Thankfully, there’s been growing recognition of the importance of promoting female leadership within the healthcare sector.
At Privia Health, the Women’s Physician Advocacy Council (WPAC) is helping lead the charge.
Each year, we survey female physicians across our network to understand the biggest barriers to leadership—like burnout and work-life balance—and use that feedback to drive meaningful change and targeted interventions to ensure our female physicians can thrive.
The impact of WPAC extends beyond individual leadership development; it has catalyzed new leadership pipelines, improved professional networking, and expanded clinical collaboration across markets.
Prioritising women’s leadership equips all physicians with skills that contribute to systematic change across the healthcare landscape – both for patients and providers.
Leadership development programmes within healthcare organisations are instrumental in driving change in women’s healthcare, providing invaluable resources such as networking opportunities, educational workshops, and Continuing Medical Education (CME) credits with a focus on critical topics like empathy, balancing professional roles, and overcoming imposter syndrome.
This holistic approach equips female physicians with the necessary support and skills to excel in leadership roles and reinforces the importance of diverse leadership perspectives in healthcare.
Collaboration between various leadership and advocacy groups fosters a community of empowered female leaders.
Through events like panel discussions and joint educational courses, these groups have created platforms for discussion and growth, highlighting the value of inclusive and innovative leadership.
This shift is not only about individual advancement but also about reshaping the culture of healthcare to be more equitable and responsive to the needs of women.
As the journey towards value-based care in women’s health continues, the potential for transformative change is immense.
Fully embracing a comprehensive model not only ensures that women’s health receives the attention, innovation, and specialized approach it deserves, but could result in more equitable and effective care.
Prioritising outcomes and equity can dismantle existing barriers, creating a healthcare system that truly meets the needs of women, and empowers leaders to drive forward a new era of healthcare excellence.
The path forward is clear: by integrating value-based care principles with strong leadership initiatives, the healthcare sector can create a future where women’s health is prioritised and celebrated.
About Dr. Zia Khan, MD
Dr. Zia Khan, MD serves as the Chief Medical Officer for Privia Medical Group— Georgia and Tennessee. Additionally, she owns and operates a multi-provider practice, Peachtree Medical Center, in Tyrone, GA and is a second-generation internal medicine physician.
She is also active in the long-term care space and serves as medical director for post-acute facilities.
About Dr. Keith Berkle, MD, MBA
Keith Berkle, MD, MBA, is the Chair of the Privia Medical Group — Mid-Atlantic Board of Governors and President of Virginia Women’s Center, a Privia Women’s Health practice.
Outside the office, he is a member of the Richmond Academy of Medicine’s Access Now programme and has engaged in surgical missions to Guatemala to provide free gynecologic care to underserved populations.
A £50m maternity consortium will bring together UK clinicians, researchers and communities to tackle the most critical gaps in maternal care.
Funding from the National Institute for Health and Care Research has established the NIHR Inequalities Challenge: Maternity Disparities Consortium under the leadership of the University of Birmingham and Newcastle University.
Higher education bodies, NHS organisations, community groups and voluntary organisations from across the UK will work together through the programme.
The NIHR has committed £50m over five years to support research led by clinicians, researchers and communities across the consortium.
Professor Joht Singh Chandan, consortium co-lead for research at the University of Birmingham, said: “National attention on maternity safety and equity has never been greater, but ambition must now be matched by evidence and implementation.
“Through this consortium, we will work across the UK to understand what works, for whom and in what contexts, and to ensure that research leads to practical changes in care for the women, babies and families who need them most.”
The launch comes at a pivotal moment for UK maternity care, with growing national attention on improving safety, equity and women’s experiences of care.
The government’s renewed Women’s Health Strategy highlights the need to improve care before and between pregnancies for underserved communities.
Against that backdrop, the consortium will generate the evidence, interventions and research capacity needed to help turn national ambition into practical improvements for women, babies and families.
University of Birmingham is leading work to improve maternity care pathways across the antenatal, intrapartum and postnatal periods.
Antenatal care covers pregnancy before labour, while intrapartum care refers to care during labour and birth.
The consortium will examine how women and families can be better supported before pregnancy and between pregnancies.
This includes improving access to advice and care that can help people prepare for pregnancy, manage existing health conditions and reduce risks before they build up.
Other research will focus on improving care during pregnancy, birth and the early weeks after birth.
This will include work on major causes of poor maternal health, such as high blood pressure, diabetes in pregnancy, obesity, perinatal mental health and complications during recovery after birth.
Professor Judith Rankin OBE, consortium co-lead for research and capacity development at Newcastle University, said: “This funding represents a critical opportunity to make the step change we need to improve outcomes for women and their babies.
“Alongside the research, the Consortium will be investing in tomorrow’s research leaders today to ensure we have the capacity to deliver on improving pregnancy outcomes, access to, and experience of, care.”
A four-week Pilates programme may improve heart, metabolic and stress measures in previously sedentary women, a small study suggests.
Pilates is a mind-body form of exercise that has been linked to better fitness, balance, posture, muscular endurance, mental wellbeing and quality of life in different groups.
Built around breathing, concentration, control, precision, centring and flow, Pilates is already used in physiotherapy, rehabilitation and preventive health. The new study looked at whether a structured four-week programme could affect cardiovascular, metabolic, body and stress-related measures in sedentary adult women.
The longitudinal study included 30 sedentary women split into two age groups, 30 to 40 and 50 to 60.
All participants completed a standardised, supervised Pilates programme lasting four weeks, with three sessions a week lasting 50 to 60 minutes.
Researchers measured resting heart rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, body mass index, abdominal circumference, fasting blood glucose and serum cortisol at the start and end of the programme.
Systolic and diastolic blood pressure are the top and bottom readings in a blood pressure test. Cortisol is a hormone linked to the body’s stress response.
The four-week Pilates programme was linked to improvements in cardiovascular, metabolic, body and neuroendocrine measures, although not every change reached statistical significance within each age group.
In the younger group, significant reductions were seen in heart rate, blood pressure, body mass index and fasting blood glucose after the intervention.
The reduction in blood pressure after the programme was significantly greater in the older group than in the younger group.
Older participants also showed a greater reduction in glucose and cortisol levels after the intervention than younger participants.
Analysis also found significant links between cardiovascular, metabolic and neuroendocrine changes.
In the younger group, this was particularly seen between heart rate and blood pressure responses.
In the older group, it was particularly seen between changes in body mass index and fasting glucose.
The findings suggest Pilates could be a useful multidimensional exercise approach for cardiometabolic health and stress regulation in previously sedentary women.
The researchers said the larger reduction in blood pressure seen in the older group may reflect a higher cardiometabolic burden at the start, leaving more room for improvement after the programme.
The greater reduction in fasting glucose and cortisol in older participants may similarly suggest that people with higher baseline metabolic and neuroendocrine dysfunction could benefit more from structured exercise such as Pilates.
Although Pilates is known to improve body composition through energy use, neuromuscular activation and support for healthier habits, the researchers said the fall in body mass index over four weeks is unlikely to be explained by Pilates alone.
They noted that participants were also told to avoid alcohol, sugar-containing products and sugar-sweetened drinks during the intervention, which may have contributed to the change.
In the younger group, the link between heart rate and blood pressure suggested coordinated cardiovascular responses after Pilates.
The researchers also found that cortisol appeared to be linked to blood pressure and body mass index, suggesting stress-related changes may be tied to cardiovascular and body regulation after the intervention.
In the older group, the link between body mass index and fasting glucose highlighted the relationship between body fat and metabolic regulation.
A positive link between blood pressure and body mass index in this group also suggested that improvements in vascular regulation may be associated with reductions in body mass.
Overall, the findings suggest Pilates-related physiological changes may involve interconnected cardiovascular, body, metabolic and neuroendocrine mechanisms, with different response patterns by age.
The study has important limits. It did not include a non-exercise control group, so it cannot prove Pilates directly caused the changes.
The sample size was also small, which limits how far the findings can be applied more widely.
The authors also noted that cortisol was measured using a single fasting morning sample, which limits conclusions about broader hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis regulation, the system involved in the body’s stress response.
They said larger studies with longer follow-up will be needed to confirm whether Pilates causes these physiological changes over time.
British women are among the angriest in Europe, a global health survey has revealed.
More than 20 per cent of women in Britain said they had experienced feelings of rage for much of the previous day.
British women were also 47 per cent more likely to say they felt angry than a year earlier.
The findings were published in the Hologic Global Women’s Health Index, a yearly league table based on polling of more than 76,000 women and girls aged over 15 worldwide.
Anna O’Sullivan, co-founder of women’s health awareness group CensHERship and founder of the FutureFemHealth news platform, told the Daily Mail: “These figures reflect years of long waiting lists, delayed diagnoses and women’s health being treated as an afterthought.
“We’ve seen a significant increase in awareness and discussion about women’s health over the last few years, but access to care has not kept up with that.
“These findings should be a wake-up call that it’s time for long-term, sustainable investment to ensure women can access timely healthcare, trusted information and earlier diagnosis before conditions become more complex and costly to treat.”
The data suggested anger levels among British women have risen sharply.
Rates across the rest of Europe, however, remained broadly the same.
The survey, which involved more than 140 countries, found three in 10 UK women said they felt sadness, compared with the EU average of 25 per cent.
The data, collected in February 2024 and released this week, also showed that around four in 10 women in both the UK and EU felt worry.
A third of women in the UK reported being in pain, up 10 per cent on the previous year.
Three in 10 women also said they lived with chronic health problems, up seven per cent on the year before.
Chronic health problems are long-term conditions that may need ongoing care or management.
Health experts said women in the UK were increasingly frustrated by the gap between the NHS care they expected and the care they received.
The report took a snapshot of the national mood, with participants asked about the emotions they had experienced “during a lot of the day yesterday”.
The UK placed sixth among 37 European countries for anger.
The highest levels were recorded in Malta, where 26 per cent of women reported feelings of rage, followed by Greece at 25 per cent, the Czech Republic and Albania at 23 per cent, and Spain at 22 per cent.
Ireland ranked at 18 per cent, while Germany, France and Switzerland each reported 17 per cent.
Britain has also slipped in Hologic’s overall global rankings for women’s health.
The UK is now 48th, close to dropping out of the top third of countries worldwide, after ranking 40th out of 142 countries last year.
Taiwan ranked first, followed by Latvia, Japan, Vietnam and Poland. Singapore, Germany and Austria were also among the leading countries.
Tim Simpson, a senior manager at Hologic, said: “Women are telling us they want earlier diagnosis and faster access to care.
“Improving women’s health will take continued commitment from policymakers, the NHS, clinicians and industry working together to deliver the changes women are asking for.”
A separate Hologic survey carried out last month found that almost 70 per cent of women had faced delays seeking NHS care in the past five years.
Two in five said difficulties accessing healthcare had left them feeling frustrated or anxious.
The survey’s findings reinforced official figures showing that Britain has become more anxious since before the pandemic.
The Office for National Statistics said 22.5 per cent of UK adults reported “high anxiety yesterday” between July and September 2024, up from 20.4 per cent in the same period in 2019.
Among women, the figure was 26.3 per cent, compared with 18.5 per cent among men.
A Department of Health and Social Care spokesperson said: “It is unacceptable that the UK continues to lag behind other countries when it comes to women’s health.”
Menopause2 weeks agoPerimenopause misinformation ‘putting women at risk’
Hormonal health3 weeks agoNHS urged to update website following renaming of PCOS
News2 weeks agoWomen still being failed when they reach menopause, experts say
Events2 weeks agoWomen’s Health Innovation Summit opens submissions for 2026 Innovation Showcase
Insight1 week agoBritish women among angriest in Europe, health survey reveals
Fertility4 weeks agoAI could transform ovarian care through personalisation, study finds
News2 weeks agoThree menopause innovators shortlisted for Femtech World Award
News3 weeks agoLow insulin diet and avoiding four food groups may prevent menopause weight gain