Pregnancy
Crisis pregnancy centres warned off ectopic scans

A lawsuit settlement in Massachusetts over alleged medical harm at a crisis pregnancy centre is prompting new legal guidance for faith-based clinics across the US.
Crisis pregnancy centres are now being advised not to perform ultrasounds on women with suspected ectopic pregnancies – a potentially life-threatening condition where an embryo implants outside the womb – and instead refer them to emergency care.
The advice was shared during a panel discussion hosted by the National Institute of Family and Life Advocates (NIFLA), a group that provides legal and medical support to crisis pregnancy centres.
Lawyers urged centres to avoid scanning women reporting symptoms.
One lawyer said during the recorded session: “Just as I’m walking down here I had a call from a centre.
“They had a woman come in who was cramping, and she said on a scale of 1 to 10, it was just below a 6. And I’m like, yikes, like, I wouldn’t scan her.”
The lawyer said the appropriate response in such cases is to send the client directly to the emergency department.
NIFLA has previously issued similar guidance.
A 2018 document states that “if a patient has symptoms of an ectopic pregnancy or miscarriage, she will not be offered an ultrasound exam and is advised, verbally and in writing, to immediately obtain medical care.”
Although NIFLA did not represent Clearway Clinic in the Massachusetts case, the centre was listed as a NIFLA member in 2023.
NIFLA has previously represented crisis pregnancy centres in high-profile cases, including a 2018 US Supreme Court case in California that resulted in a First Amendment ruling in their favour.
Crisis pregnancy centres are religiously affiliated organisations that provide free pregnancy tests and ultrasounds, typically with the aim of discouraging abortion, according to the American College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists.
They have been criticised for presenting themselves as comprehensive reproductive health clinics while following an ideological rather than clinical model of care, according to a paper in the American Medical Association Journal of Ethics.
During the NIFLA panel, lawyers and a participating doctor advised against scanning women with symptoms of possible ectopic pregnancy, particularly in cases involving low levels of human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG) – a hormone produced by the placenta in early pregnancy.
Low or slowly rising HCG levels may indicate miscarriage or ectopic pregnancy.
The doctor said: “I’m not scanning. If you’ve got a level that’s low like that, it could be early pregnancy, but that is one of the cardinal signs of ectopic and one of the cardinal signs of miscarriage, slowly rising HCG.
“Please do not. She’s already got a provider. Dump it back on them.”
“She should be going back to her provider,” a legal representative added.
Andrea Swartzendruber, a researcher who studies crisis pregnancy centres, described the advice as a significant shift.
She said: “That seems like a very marked change, especially given that so many CPCs are using fear around ectopic pregnancy as a reason to come in and get scanned.”
The panel also addressed privacy concerns.
While many centres claim to be “HIPAA-compliant”, they are not legally bound by the US Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA), which applies only to specific healthcare entities.
One lawyer said: “There’s this movement not to say HIPAA, and I just finally got everybody to spell it right. So I’m kind of upset.
“We want you to abide by those policies, but don’t advertise yourself as HIPAA-compliant.”
Debra Rosen, executive director of Reproductive Health and Freedom Watch, said this approach can be misleading.
Rosen said: “Unregulated pregnancy clinics masquerade as medical facilities, are not covered entities under HIPAA, and for decades have vigorously pushed back against even the most basic forms of accountability.
“Women nationwide face real harms as these fringe clinics trap them between illusions of confidentiality and the actual legal protections they receive.
“This dangerous gap demands legislative action.”
Pregnancy
£50m initiative aims to tackle disparities in maternal healthcare
Entrepreneur
Liverpool uni secures £18.m for women’s health studio and life-saving tech

The University of Liverpool has secured £1.8m to test a device for postpartum bleeding and launch a new women’s health studio.
The PPH Butterfly is designed to help control postpartum haemorrhage, which is severe bleeding after childbirth and a leading cause of maternal death worldwide.
The funding will support research into how the device can be used in clinical practice and generate evidence to inform its wider adoption.
The university has launched the Women’s Health Innovation Studio, known as the WIN Studio, alongside the project.
The £1.8m initiative is predominantly funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research, which is providing £1.5m, with additional support from the university.
The PPH Butterfly project will involve a multi-centre clinical trial across the UK and a global feasibility study looking at how practical it would be to use the device in different healthcare settings.
The WIN Studio is led by Andrew Weeks, professor of international maternal health care at the University of Liverpool and a senior investigator at the National Institute for Health and Care Research, and Dr Teesta Dey, a tenure track fellow in the department of women’s and children’s health.
Dr Dey will also lead the PPH Butterfly project.
Its work will cover conditions linked to female biology, including endometriosis, menopause and pregnancy-related complications.
It will also support technologies for diseases that affect women differently or disproportionately, even when they are not usually classed as gender-specific conditions.
Dr Dey said: “Women’s health has often been marginalised within healthcare systems and innovation markets, resulting in treatments, devices and care models that fail to adequately account for women’s specific needs. WIN Studio seeks to change this status quo and reconfigure how health technologies are conceived and delivered.
“The funding from NIHR for this £1.8m project is precisely the kind of innovation the WIN Studio exists to foster: clinically urgent, women-centred, and with the potential to save lives at scale.”
The studio recently hosted an event at Liverpool Women’s University Hospital as part of the Liverpool City Region Combined Authority’s Innovation Investment Fortnight.
Seven innovations are currently undergoing clinical testing through the studio, with three developed internally.
The studio will work closely with NHS University Hospitals Liverpool Group and provide clinical, regulatory and commercial support to people developing women’s health technologies.
It will also involve patients and members of the public in shaping research priorities and product development.
Its wider programme includes collaborations involving clinicians, engineers, economists, academics and policymakers.
The project team says the PPH Butterfly is a simple, low-cost device designed to control severe bleeding quickly and with minimal training.
According to the team, postpartum haemorrhage causes around 70,000 deaths globally each year, equal to about one death every seven minutes.
The device previously received £1.1m in funding from the National Institute for Health and Care Research.
The latest £1.5m grant will support a randomised UK trial, in which participants are allocated to different treatment groups by chance, and a global feasibility assessment.
Weeks said: “In an area where women face deep health inequalities, WIN Studio has a vital role to play. By working in partnership with the NHS, local government and communities, we can ensure that research leads to real-world impact.
“Liverpool has a highly integrated ecosystem of academic, clinical and commercial expertise. By bringing these together under a single platform, the WIN Studio aims to act as a national exemplar for equitable health innovation. Transforming the way medical technologies are developed is essential to addressing gender disparities in healthcare outcomes.”
Another product supported by the university, the LifeStart Trolley, has already reached commercialisation.
The small mobile resuscitation trolley allows newborn care to be carried out at the bedside while the baby’s umbilical cord remains intact, enabling delayed cord clamping.
Delayed cord clamping means waiting before cutting the cord so blood can continue flowing from the placenta to the baby after birth.
Clinical trials conducted around 10 years ago found that life-saving care could be provided successfully at the bedside using the trolley.
It was later commercialised by Inspiration Healthcare and is now used in more than 70 UK maternity units and in 36 countries, including Norway, Italy and the US.
Pregnancy
Type 2 diabetes raising twice as fast in younger womem, research finds
Menopause2 weeks agoPerimenopause misinformation ‘putting women at risk’
Hormonal health3 weeks agoNHS urged to update website following renaming of PCOS
News2 weeks agoWomen still being failed when they reach menopause, experts say
Insight4 weeks agoPCOS renamed after decade-long campaign to end ‘cyst’ misconception
Entrepreneur2 weeks agoWomen’s Health Innovation Summit opens submissions for 2026 Innovation Showcase
Insight1 week agoBritish women among angriest in Europe, health survey reveals
News2 weeks agoThree menopause innovators shortlisted for Femtech World Award
Fertility4 weeks agoAI could transform ovarian care through personalisation, study finds
















