Connect with us

Fertility

What Depo-Provera litigation means for the future of women’s health

Published

on

By Aron Solomon, Pulitzer Prize-nominated writer and chief strategy officer for Amplify

For decades, Depo-Provera was marketed as a convenient, long-lasting birth control option for women who want to take control of their reproductive health without the hassle of daily pills.

It was sold as a solution—an easy shot every three months that promised reliability and freedom.

 

But what was often left out of the conversation was the growing body of evidence linking the drug to serious, long-term side effects, including bone density loss, increased risk of certain cancers, and severe mental health impacts.

And now, lawsuits against the makers of Depo-Provera are bringing those risks into the national spotlight.

But this fight isn’t just about compensation. It’s about something much bigger: transparency, accountability, and the demand for better healthcare for women.

The lawsuits against Depo-Provera’s manufacturer aren’t happening in a vacuum.

They are part of a broader, long-standing pattern of medical products being introduced, marketed, and prescribed to women without full disclosure of their risks.

Time and time again, women’s health concerns have been dismissed, downplayed, or outright ignored until legal action forces the issue.

We saw it with the Dalkon Shield IUD in the 1970s, which led to infections, infertility, and deaths before it was pulled from the market and resulted in a massive lawsuit.

We saw it with the Yaz and Yasmin birth control pills, which were linked to life-threatening blood clots and only got black-box warnings after lawsuits mounted. And we are seeing it now with Depo-Provera.

At the heart of these lawsuits is a simple but powerful demand: women deserve to know what they’re putting into their bodies.

They deserve full transparency about risks, not sugarcoated reassurances or buried data.

Depo-Provera has been linked to decreased bone mineral density, a serious issue that can lead to osteoporosis later in life.

Studies have shown that the loss is often not fully reversible, yet many women were never warned about this before they started using the drug.

There is also an increased risk of cancer and mood disorders like depression and anxiety—again, side effects that weren’t always fully disclosed or studied in depth before Depo-Provera was widely distributed.

The legal action against the manufacturers of Depo-Provera represents more than just a quest for justice for those who have suffered—it’s a means of demanding systemic change.

These lawsuits pressure pharmaceutical companies to do better, not just in how they test and approve drugs but in how they communicate risks to patients.

They send a clear message that women are no longer willing to accept subpar treatment when it comes to their health. And they put the medical establishment on notice: accountability is no longer optional.

A crucial part of this movement is the push for more inclusive and thorough clinical research.

Historically, medical research has been male-centered, with women often being treated as an afterthought.

This has led to an incomplete understanding of how drugs affect women’s bodies differently.

When women’s unique health needs aren’t properly studied, they aren’t properly addressed—and that has real consequences.

The Depo-Provera lawsuits highlight the need for drug trials that take women’s long-term health seriously, rather than treating side effects as acceptable trade-offs.

Beyond the pharmaceutical industry, these lawsuits are also challenging the role of healthcare providers in informed consent.

Many women report that they were never told about the full extent of Depo-Provera’s risks before receiving the shot.

Some were assured that side effects were minimal or temporary, only to later discover that their bone density had been permanently compromised.

Others struggled with severe depression or anxiety, unaware that their birth control method could be a contributing factor.

Informed consent isn’t just a legal formality—it’s a fundamental right. Women have the right to make decisions about their bodies based on complete, unbiased information, and these lawsuits are reinforcing that right.

The implications of this legal battle extend far beyond Depo-Provera. They are part of a larger cultural shift in how we approach women’s healthcare.

Women are demanding better—not just in birth control options but in all aspects of reproductive and general health.

They are calling for safer medications, clearer communication, and a medical system that prioritises their well-being rather than treating them as a market for profitable drugs.

This movement is already starting to see results.

The increased scrutiny around Depo-Provera and similar cases is prompting more discussions about alternative birth control methods and the need for more research into safer, hormone-free options.

It’s pushing regulators to be more aggressive in requiring clear warnings and more thorough testing. And it’s empowering women to ask more questions, demand better answers, and take an active role in their healthcare decisions.

The lawsuits against Depo-Provera are not just about financial settlements. They are about changing the way women’s health is treated in this country.

They are about shifting the balance of power so that women are no longer passive recipients of whatever the pharmaceutical industry decides to sell them.

They are about ensuring that future generations don’t have to fight the same battles over and over again just to get basic transparency and respect in medical care.

Legal action has long been one of the most powerful tools for change, and in the case of Depo-Provera, it’s proving to be an essential force in the fight for better women’s healthcare.

The message is clear: women will no longer accept being kept in the dark about their own health.

They are standing up, speaking out, and demanding better. And the medical world—pharmaceutical companies, doctors, and regulators alike—needs to start listening.

Fertility

Older women face lower chance of fertility treatment working, even with donor eggs, study finds

Published

on

IVF success declines with age even when women use young donor eggs, with a marked fall from around 49, research suggests.

The findings challenge the idea that donor eggs can fully “reset” the reproductive clock, although researchers said they should not discourage older couples from trying.

Dr Beatrice Crestani, from an assisted reproduction medical institute in Italy, said reproductive ageing had traditionally been seen mainly as an issue involving the ovaries.

She said replacing older eggs with younger donor eggs was often believed to “reset” the reproductive clock.

Dr Crestani added: “Our findings suggest the picture is more complex.”

The study followed 1,774 women undergoing in vitro fertilisation, or IVF, using donated eggs. IVF involves fertilising an egg in a laboratory before transferring an embryo to the womb.

Women in their mid to late 30s had a 54 per cent chance of becoming pregnant after treatment, compared with around 43 per cent among those aged 49 or older.

Live birth rates fell from 46 per cent to 32 per cent, while miscarriage rates rose from 24 per cent to 38 per cent.

Women aged 49 and older had twice the risk of miscarriage compared with those aged 35 to 40.

Researchers believe changes to the endometrium with age may help explain the difference. The endometrium is the lining of the womb where a fertilised egg or embryo implants and grows.

Although the thickness of the womb lining was similar across the age groups, its condition declined with age.

Researchers said future work might find ways to predict, prevent or improve uterine ageing.

Dr Crestani said: “These findings should not discourage women from pursuing donor-egg treatment, because success rates remain meaningful even at advanced ages.

“However, patients should be counselled that donor eggs cannot completely eliminate the effects of reproductive ageing, particularly beyond 49 years.”

Among women who transferred all their available embryos, the live birth rate was around 80 per cent for those aged 35 to 40 and 62.5 per cent for those aged 49 or older.

Experts stressed that the health of the womb and ovaries differs between women.

There is no legal upper age limit for IVF in the UK, unlike some European countries. Greece has an upper limit of 54.

Women in the UK can donate or share their eggs up to the age of 36.

Regulators ask private UK clinics to assess the welfare of any resulting child and whether the recipient can safely carry a pregnancy.

NHS guidelines recommend offering three IVF cycles to women up to the age of 40 and one cycle to women up to the age of 42.

Patients using donor eggs usually have to fund that part of the treatment themselves.

People conceived using sperm, eggs or embryos from donors registered after 1 April 2005 can request identifying information about their biological donor parent once they turn 18.

The findings are being presented at the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology.

Professor Borut Kovacic, chair-elect of the society, said researchers were trying to better understand the “cross-talk” between an implanting embryo and the womb lining. This refers to the biological signals exchanged during implantation.

He said the age threshold associated with the beginning of a loss of uterine function was unlikely to be absolute.

Professor Kovacic added: “It provides important information for patients and offers a valuable foundation for future research aimed at identifying novel biomarkers of uterine ageing.”

Dr Ippokratis Sarris, chair-elect of the British Fertility Society, called for more research.

He said pregnancies could carry greater risks for older women and recommended thorough health checks and counselling for couples beginning fertility treatment.

Continue Reading

Insight

Women with PMOS should have annual NHS checks, new guidance says

Published

on

Women with PMOS should receive annual NHS checks to spot related health risks sooner, according to new draft guidance.

Polyendocrine metabolic ovarian syndrome (PMOS) is a complex condition that can have wide-ranging effects across the body.

It affects around one in eight women and was formerly known as polycystic ovary syndrome. It was renamed in May to better reflect its broader effects.

Draft guidance from the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) calls for quicker diagnosis and better monitoring.

Marie Anne Ledingham, consultant clinical adviser for women’s and reproductive health at NICE, described the recommendation for a “simple” annual review as an “important step”.

She said: “This new guideline will help improve consistency of care, increase awareness of the condition, and support earlier diagnosis and management.”

PMOS is a major cause of female infertility. Symptoms can include irregular or absent periods, difficulty becoming pregnant, excessive facial or body hair, weight gain, hair loss, oily skin and acne.

An estimated three million to four million women have the condition in the UK, but NICE says it remains underdiagnosed and inconsistently managed.

The proposed annual reviews would cover current symptoms and longer-term health risks linked to the condition, including diabetes and heart disease.

NICE says lifestyle changes and treatment could help prevent more serious illness.

There is no cure for PMOS, but NHS treatments can help manage its symptoms. These include hormone support and fertility drugs.

The draft guideline does not recommend laser or light therapies for hair reduction because of the cost.

Many women report difficulty understanding the possible cause of their symptoms or experience delays before receiving a diagnosis.

When doctors suspect PMOS, they may use blood tests to assess hormone levels and ultrasound scans to look for the multiple follicles often seen on the ovaries of those affected. Follicles are small, fluid-filled sacs in which eggs develop.

The draft guideline sets out when healthcare professionals should suspect the condition and how women should be assessed and diagnosed.

It also says PMOS should not be ruled out in women who have been through the menopause.

The condition is thought to be more common among black, Asian and mixed-ethnicity women. NICE says healthcare professionals should consider this when assessing symptoms.

PMOS can also have a significant effect on mental health and quality of life, with depression and anxiety described as common among women with the condition.

Women planning a pregnancy should receive advice on weight, diet, nutrition, exercise, sleep and mental health, according to the guidance.

The draft guideline is open for consultation from 1 July to 11 August 2026, with feedback invited from healthcare professionals, patients and the public.

The final guideline is expected to be published in December 2026.

Continue Reading

Fertility

Immunotherapy may temporarily restore fertility in premature menopause

Published

on

Immunotherapy may temporarily restore fertility in women with autoimmune premature ovarian insufficiency, a pilot study suggests.

Three of the 10 women who received treatment later gave birth to healthy babies.

Premature ovarian insufficiency, or POI, affects just over three per cent of women worldwide and occurs when the ovaries stop functioning before the age of 40.

The condition significantly reduces fertility and can have several causes, including autoimmune processes and genetics.

Researchers at Karolinska Institutet examined whether immunotherapy could make the ovaries temporarily responsive to hormonal stimulation in women with POI caused by autoimmunity.

The study included 12 women aged between 18 and 35 with autoimmune POI.

Two withdrew before treatment began. The remaining 10 underwent ovarian hormone stimulation before receiving rituximab and again four to six months after treatment.

Rituximab is an approved and well-established medicine used to treat several autoimmune conditions and cancers.

None of the women responded to ovarian stimulation before receiving the drug.

After treatment, six developed follicles that made it possible to retrieve eggs in response to ovarian stimulation.

Follicles are small sacs within the ovaries where eggs develop.

Professor Angelica Lindén Hirschberg, the study’s first author and a professor at Karolinska Institutet’s Department of Women’s and Children’s Health, said: “The results show that in some women there remains an egg reserve that can be activated when the autoimmune process is suppressed.”

In five women, mature eggs could be frozen or fertilised.

Three later had embryos transferred and all three gave birth to healthy babies.

For safety reasons, the embryo transfers took place no earlier than one year after treatment.

One serious side effect was reported and was linked to the hormone stimulation rather than the immunotherapy.

Women with autoimmune POI commonly have other autoimmune diseases.

All six women who responded to the treatment also had autoimmune Addison’s disease, a condition in which the immune system destroys the adrenal glands.

The study was a proof-of-concept investigation without a control group and involved a small number of participants, meaning the findings must be interpreted cautiously.

A proof-of-concept study is an early investigation designed to assess whether an approach could work before it is tested more widely.

Professor Lindén Hirschberg said: “This is a first step. To determine whether the method is effective and safe, larger, randomised studies are required.”

The research team has launched a larger randomised study.

The work was carried out by researchers at Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital and the University of Bergen.

It was funded by organisations including the Swedish Research Council, the Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation, the Novo Nordisk Foundation and Region Stockholm.

The researchers reported no conflicts of interest.

POI is also linked to long-term health risks caused by oestrogen deficiency, including osteoporosis, an increased risk of cardiovascular disease, cognitive decline and poorer mental and sexual wellbeing.

Hormone replacement therapy can relieve menopausal symptoms and reduce many of these risks, but no treatment has been reliably shown to restore fertility in women with POI.

Egg donation was previously the only option for women with the condition who wanted to become pregnant.

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025 Aspect Health Media Ltd. All Rights Reserved.