Motherhood
How do I know if I have a strong personal injury case?

Every day, people get injured. Injuries are regarded as a global health issue because they cause countless deaths per year and contribute to the burden of disease, mainly affecting people of low socio-economic status.
It’s reckless not to apply the same energy put into preventing diseases to preventing injuries, the simplest of tasks. While most injuries are accidents for which no one is to blame, some injuries are caused by fault, which brings about the prospect of compensation for damages.
Nobody plans to be injured, but in today’s society, many people are hurt because others fail to behave reasonably to prevent foreseeable harm, losing out financially as a consequence.
Even a minor injury is harrowing and can disrupt your life. You can use many sources of advice when deciding whether your injuries are eligible for compensation, including your insurer or legal advisor. Aside from care, rehabilitation, and financial losses, you’re compensated for the unquantifiable pain and suffering losses.
If a lawyer agrees to represent you, they can offer various ways to pay their fees, such as a conditional fee agreement, where they agree to act on a “no win, no fee” basis.
The amount of compensation awarded depends mainly on the nature and seriousness of the injuries sustained, so the legal professionals must be able to prove the injuries are the result of the accident and not a pre-existing condition (or other accidents). A skilled lawyer can identify weaknesses and flaws in your case that a layperson would have difficulty spotting.
These are the telltale signs that indicate your personal injury claim is worth pursuing:
The Defendant Admitted Liability
You must demonstrate the defendant is partially or entirely responsible for the accident, and the degree to which they’re at fault impacts the amount of damages paid.
The law isn’t concerned with penalising individuals but with protecting people from unreasonable risk or harm, so it’s necessary to determine the extent to which someone is negligent. In a personal injury claim, several factors go into proving liability, namely:
- A duty of care existed that was breached
- That breach caused an injury
- An injury, in fact, resulted
An admission of liability means the fight is cancelled, and you can sort out compensation. The defendant takes responsibility for their acts or an omission that resulted in harm – it’s not just an acknowledgment of fault; it entails accepting the consequences that come with such a confession. Admission of fault is the most powerful tool in your arsenal as it prepares your personal injury case for trial.
With the court’s permission, the defendant can withdraw from admission of liability if further evidence has been discovered or was not previously available.
The court will consider all the circumstances of the case, including the parties’ conduct and what stage the proceedings have reached. If you don’t know what to do, a second opinion is always welcome, even if it only confirms your view. You may obtain legal advice without any upfront cost. Please visit https://www.personalinjuryclaimsuk.org.uk/ for counsel about a specific civil legal issue.
The Incident Was Caught On Camera
Video surveillance is frequently used to substantiate a claim, addressing the “what happened?” question and its implications. The use of security cameras has been enhanced by advancements in technology, notably the advent of concealable, high-resolution digital cameras, and it’s effective at trial because the jury can easily understand it.
Obtaining video footage of your accident can make or break your case. Not only does it serve as a witness to the incident, but it also provides a powerful video testimony.
Since time is of the essence, you must act now. Surveillance video is deleted or copied over on a regular basis, so send a letter requesting the preservation of the recording for the court, specifying a time period before and after the event to obtain as much evidence as possible.
You or your investigator should go to the scene of the accident and ask local businesses if they captured the event on video. Even if the defendant has surveillance video footage, they might refuse to hand it over, especially if it supports your claim.
You’ve Suffered Severe Injuries
Some people experience significant pain and suffering as a result of the injury or subsequent treatment. For example, a trauma like severe burns with lung damage is characterised by excruciating pain for a long time; the claimant isn’t totally dependent but requires constant care. The measure of the injury’s impact is determined based on several criteria, namely:
- The nature of the injury
- The duration and nature of the treatment
- The working time lost
- Permanent damage and cost
The more severe your injuries, the more complicated your recovery is. The injury doesn’t necessarily need to be physical: emotional and mental damage arising from car accidents, medical negligence, or slips, trips, and falls are taken into account in a personal injury case.
Suppose you’re in a situation where your life has changed for the worse. In that case, you have a severe personal injury, so have a lawyer or another professional submit your claim on your behalf if you don’t want to bear the cost of medical services yourself.
It’s a good idea to keep a record or a diary and assemble the full details of any items you want to claim (e.g., loss of earnings). If you don’t accept the settlement offer, the claim will continue, but you can enter further negotiations, maybe exchange other offers; the defendant should pay your compensation shortly following your acceptance.
Final Thoughts
Suffering an injury as the result of another person’s negligence or wrongful acts has such a strong effect that it can change your life. If you file a personal injury claim on your own, you’ll find out just how complicated the process is – you must gather evidence, the opposing lawyer will try to take advantage of your fragile state, and you’ll have questions about what to do next.
Don’t go at it alone. A lawyer will make the difference between you receiving reasonable compensation and not receiving what you deserve for your losses.
Motherhood
Health visitor support helps new mothers stay smoke-free, study finds

Health visitor support may help women who quit smoking during pregnancy remain smoke-free after giving birth, research suggests.
The BabyBreathe programme was designed to help women who stopped smoking before or during pregnancy avoid returning to smoking after childbirth.
The programme was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research and tested by a team led by the University of East Anglia.
Professor Michael Ussher of the University of Stirling’s Institute for Social Marketing and Health was a senior investigator on the study and led recruitment at two trial sites.
Ussher said: “This study is the first to show that an intervention focussing on support from a health visitor may help women avoid returning to smoking.
“These findings are important as many women stop smoking in pregnancy but then return to smoking soon after their baby is born.”
BabyBreathe provides one-to-one support from trained health visitors alongside digital tools, text message support, a dedicated website and app and a relapse-prevention kit sent to families after birth.
Women who received the intervention as intended, with support from trained health visitors, were significantly more likely to remain smoke-free 12 months after giving birth than those without health visitor support.
A total of 886 women from England and Scotland who had successfully stopped smoking before or during pregnancy took part in the large-scale randomised controlled trial.
Participants were randomly assigned to receive either BabyBreathe or usual care, which offered no advice or support aimed at preventing smoking relapse.
BabyBreathe was not delivered as intended to around one in five participants because of health visitor workforce pressures, missed appointments or administrative problems.
Health visitors provided tailored one-to-one advice and support to women in the intervention group towards the end of pregnancy and immediately after their baby was born.
The support included advice on alternatives women could try if they experienced urges to smoke again, as well as advice for partners and family members and access to digital resources including the BabyBreathe app and website.
A relapse-prevention kit was also posted to women immediately after their baby was born.
Support continued for up to 12 months after childbirth during routine health visitor appointments.
The intervention followed more than a decade of research and development involving women, families, health professionals and researchers who worked together to design, develop and test the support package.
Among participants who received the intervention as intended, 57.6 per cent remained smoke-free after 12 months, compared with 49.9 per cent of those receiving usual care.
Researchers said the findings suggest health visiting services could play a significant role in providing consistent relapse-prevention support and helping more mothers remain smoke-free after giving birth.
Lead researcher Professor Caitlin Notley, professor of addiction sciences at UEA’s Norwich Medical School, said: “Women of childbearing age who quit and stay non-smoking can reduce their risks of developing a smoking-related disease to almost the same level of risk as non-smokers.
“There are also great benefits for babies and children brought up by parents who do not smoke in avoiding exposure to second-hand smoke, and in helping to prevent the next generation from taking up smoking.
“Until now, health visitors had no training on smoking relapse prevention.
“This meant that when women had made the extremely important and difficult health behaviour change of quitting smoking during pregnancy, no one picked up on this and gave them positive praise and support.
“This new approach extends the intensive support for initially quitting smoking that pregnant women are offered, going one step further to help women to stay smokefree in the long term.”
Researchers noted several limitations that affected the primary analysis, including incomplete delivery of BabyBreathe and low engagement with some parts of the programme.
The participant group was also more highly educated and less socioeconomically deprived than the wider population, which may have affected the programme’s overall effectiveness and limit how broadly the findings can be applied.
The Institute of Health Visiting worked with UEA on the BabyBreathe study.
Vicky Gilroy, director of innovation and research at the Institute of Health Visiting, said: “Health visitors and their teams are uniquely placed to support women in preventing smoking relapse as part of their universal offer.
“It has been a privilege to contribute to the BabyBreathe study and help develop the evidence of the importance of their role. The findings reinforce the need for all health visitors to receive training in this important area.”
Motherhood
New psychedelic treatment shows early promise against postpartum depression

A single day of inhaled psychedelic treatment may relieve postpartum depression symptoms, with effects lasting for a week, early research suggests.
Postpartum depression is a severe mood disorder that affects women after giving birth. Symptoms can include extreme sadness, anxiety, changes in sleep and eating habits and difficulty bonding with a baby.
The condition affects up to one in five mothers globally. If untreated, it can have lasting effects on a mother’s psychological wellbeing and a child’s cognitive development.
Standard antidepressants, including selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, a common type of antidepressant, often take four to six weeks to start working.
They can also cause side effects including weight gain, nausea and sexual dysfunction.
The only medication specifically approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for postpartum depression is zuranolone. It works faster than standard antidepressants but requires a 14-day daily course and carries warnings about drowsiness.
Researchers are exploring psychoactive compounds as possible alternatives for faster relief.
Mebufotenin, also known as 5-MeO-DMT, is a psychedelic compound that acts on serotonin receptors in the brain. Serotonin is a chemical messenger involved in functions including mood, sleep and digestion.
Previous early-stage trials found that an inhaled synthetic formulation called GH001 produced very rapid antidepressant effects in people with treatment-resistant depression.
Lead authors Martin Johnson of St Pancras Clinical Research and Kristina M. Deligiannidis of the Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research investigated whether the treatment could safely help women with severe postpartum depression.
The trial assessed its safety, side effects and impact on maternal functioning. It was funded by GH Research, the company developing the drug.
Researchers enrolled 10 women aged 18 to 45. All had major depressive disorder that began shortly before or after giving birth and were at least four weeks postpartum.
Participants also had to score at least 28 on a standard depression questionnaire, indicating moderate to severe depression.
Treatment was given on a single day using a specialised vaporisation system, with patients inhaling the medication from a collection balloon.
Doses were adjusted according to each woman’s response.
Participants first received 6mg. Those who tolerated the drug but did not experience a sufficiently intense psychoactive effect could receive 12mg one hour later, followed by 18mg after another hour if needed.
Researchers used a specialised scale to assess the intensity of the psychedelic experience, including feelings of losing control and how profound the experience felt.
Further doses were stopped once participants reached a predefined score.
Patients were monitored for changes in vital signs, psychiatric symptoms and overall comfort.
The psychedelic effects lasted for an average of around 20 to 25 minutes after each dose.
Participants also had to arrange for a trusted adult to care for their baby while they received treatment.
The main measure was the change in depression scores between the start of the study and day eight. Researchers also measured symptoms two hours after the final dose and on day two.
Four participants were lactating, allowing researchers to test their breast milk and assess how quickly the drug was eliminated from their bodies.
All 10 women experienced at least a 50 per cent reduction in depression symptoms two hours after their final dose.
By day eight, average depression scores had fallen by around 96 per cent and every participant met the study criteria for remission, meaning they no longer met the clinical threshold for depression.
Participants also reported improvements in maternal functioning.
Scores on a questionnaire assessing psychological wellbeing, self-care and mother-child interaction improved by around 56 per cent by day eight, with gains seen across almost all areas measured.
No serious adverse events were reported.
The most common side effect was mild to moderate headache, experienced by five of the 10 women.
The treatment did not cause lingering sedation and all participants were able to return home on the day they received it.
Among the four lactating women, levels of the drug and its byproducts in breast milk peaked around one hour after the final dose and fell below detectable levels after about 10 hours.
Researchers said this suggests mothers may only need to pause breastfeeding for a relatively short period on the day of treatment, although further research is needed before firm clinical recommendations can be made.
The trial was open-label, meaning both participants and researchers knew the active drug was being given.
There was no placebo comparison group, making it impossible to rule out the possibility that expectations about the treatment influenced the reported improvements.
The sample was also small and lacked demographic diversity, with nine of the 10 participants identified as white.
Almost none of the women were taking other psychiatric medications during the trial, meaning the findings may not reflect how a broader and more diverse group of mothers with postpartum depression would respond.
Researchers followed the women for only one week after treatment, leaving questions about how long the antidepressant effects may last.
Future studies will need to follow patients for several months to assess whether depression returns or additional doses are needed.
Larger trials will also need to randomly assign participants to receive either the active treatment or a placebo.
These studies will be needed to confirm the treatment’s safety and determine whether the drug itself is responsible for the rapid reduction in symptoms.
Motherhood
One in eight mothers diagnosed with gestational diabetes, research finds

One in eight mothers in England is now diagnosed with gestational diabetes, after diagnoses of the condition rose by 60 per cent in just five years, according to a major study.
The research found that rates of gestational diabetes increased from around 8 per cent of pregnancies in 2018 to more than 12 per cent in 2022.
Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) develops when the body cannot produce enough insulin to regulate blood sugar levels during pregnancy.
It is the most common complication to occur during pregnancy and is associated with a heightened risk of preterm birth, emergency caesarean section, and babies being born either larger or smaller than expected for their gestational age.
The condition is also linked to longer-term health risks for both mothers and their children.
Laura Magee is professor of women’s health at King’s College London and co-investigator on the study.
She said: “Pregnancy outcomes for women with gestational diabetes are still worse than those for women without gestational diabetes.
“Further work is required to address how control of blood sugar and timed birth can address the excess of adverse pregnancy outcomes, compared with the general maternity population.
“Follow-up after birth is also essential, as women with prior gestational diabetes are at increased risk of cardiometabolic disease, including type 2 diabetes mellitus, but also high blood pressure and elevated blood cholesterol, starting within the first year after birth.”
For the study, researchers analysed routinely collected NHS maternity data covering more than 2.3 million mothers and around 2.8 million births across 184 hospitals in England between 2018 and 2022, making it one of the largest investigations of its kind.
The study uncovered marked inequalities in both the prevalence of gestational diabetes and pregnancy outcomes more broadly.
The sharpest rises in diagnoses were recorded among Asian women, among whom rates reached around 23 per cent, and among women living in the most deprived areas, where rates climbed to about 14 per cent.
The disparities extended beyond gestational diabetes.
Black mothers were found to be more likely to experience an emergency caesarean birth, women in deprived areas were more likely to give birth prematurely, and Asian mothers were more likely to have babies born small for their gestational age.
Among these higher-risk groups, researchers found that a diagnosis of gestational diabetes further compounded the risk of preterm birth.
Rising maternal age, increasing rates of obesity and improvements in how data is captured by the NHS are all likely to be contributing to the growing prevalence of the condition, the researchers said.
Notably, they found that changes to gestational diabetes screening introduced during the Covid-19 pandemic did not meaningfully affect the overall upward trend in diagnoses, suggesting the rise reflects genuine underlying changes in the population rather than shifts in testing practice.
The researchers said the findings pointed to an urgent need to strengthen maternity services and improve support for the women at greatest risk.
Experts said the findings also carried implications that extend well beyond pregnancy itself.
Dr Sonya Babu-Narayan, clinical director at the British Heart Foundation, said the study was part of a wider pattern of research using large-scale health data to uncover hidden risks.
“Big data research studies like this, which can now analyse millions of healthcare records, are uncovering a concerning rise in conditions which raise people’s chances of having a future heart attack or stroke,” she said.
“Gestational diabetes often goes away after pregnancy, but it can increase women’s risk of future cardiovascular disease.”
Dr Babu-Narayan called on healthcare professionals to routinely ask women about pregnancy-related risk factors, regardless of how long ago the pregnancy took place.
“Healthcare professionals who want to fully understand people’s risk of heart attack and stroke should routinely ask women about risk factors unique to them, such as diabetes or high blood pressure in pregnancy – even if that pregnancy was decades earlier,” she said.
“If you are a woman who has had diabetes or high blood pressure during pregnancy, it is especially important to attend health checks when invited.”
Entrepreneur2 weeks agoApplications close August 18 for Women’s Health Innovation Summit 2026 Innovation Showcase
Mental health2 weeks agoThird of women unaware of perimenopause mental health impact
Fertility6 days agoChelsea FC Women to launch first-of-its-kind player fertility fund
Entrepreneur2 weeks agoWomen’s Health Week Europe 2026 releases fully populated agenda ahead of October summit
Menopause1 week agoMenopausal hormone therapy may lower dementia risk, study suggests
Hormonal health2 weeks agoWe are wrapping our children in plastic and calling it care
Pregnancy2 weeks agoChemicals in plastics may be linked to high blood pressure during pregnancy
Opinion6 days agoanna perimenopause app launches across 39 markets






