Connect with us

Motherhood

IBCLC shares why Ardo’s KindestCup is a game-changer for breastfeeding mums

By Verena Keller, IBCLC lactation consultant , Solms, Germany

Published

on

The little everyday aids for collecting precious breast milk

As an IBCLC lactation consultant with years of practical experience, I have accompanied countless mothers who have used various aids to collect and feed breast milk.

In this article, I would like to compare the new kindestCup with existing silicone breast pumps and milk collection cups.

My observations and feedback from mums form the basis for this comparison.

Ardo kindestCup: A closer look at the newcomer

The kindestCup is an innovative silicone milk collection cup that holds itself to the breast by means of a small vacuum.

The vacuum is very low and only serves to hold it securely to the breast, but it does not actively suck out any milk.

This product is very versatile: it can be used for both active and passive collection of breast milk and can also be used for feeding the milk.

Advantages of the kindestCup

⦁ Independent hold: The vacuum ensures that the kindestCup stays securely on the breast without the mother having to hold it in place. This makes breastfeeding much easier and gives the mother more freedom of movement.
⦁ No influence on the amount of milk: The vacuum of the kindestCup is very gentle and only collects the milk that the body produces naturally. This means that no possible overproduction is encouraged and only the baby’s demand determines the amount of milk.
⦁ Comfort and fit: The soft silicone material adapts well to the breast and ensures a high level of comfort. The adaptability of the material prevents pressure marks and discomfort. Thanks to the wide opening, the kindestCup can be used regardless of the mother’s breast size.
Multifunctionality: The kindestCup can be used to collect milk while breastfeeding and expressing by hand as well as for feeding the baby, making it an extremely practical everyday tool.

Disadvantages of the kindestCup

⦁ Learning curve: As the kindestCup is a new product, creating a vacuum may be unfamiliar to some mums. Good instructions and some practice are helpful to get used to the application and to create the vacuum correctly.

Silicone breast pumps: Proven, but not perfect

Silicone breast pumps have been on the market for several years and offer an inexpensive and easy way to express breast milk.

Despite their popularity, some mothers report various disadvantages.

Disadvantages of silicone breast pumps

⦁ Risk of overproduction: Particularly in the early stages of milk production, the use of silicone breast pumps can lead to overproduction and thus to mastitis. This is a common problem that requires careful supervision and guidance from experienced lactation consultants.
⦁ Easy detachment: Due to their design, these pumps can easily slip off the breast, especially if the mother or baby moves. This not only leads to frustration, but also to possible milk loss.
⦁ Problems with size: The universal size of most silicone breast pumps does not always fit every breast perfectly, which can lead to an uncomfortable feeling.
⦁ No freedom of movement: Mothers have to hold the pump while using it or use a strap, which restricts their freedom of movement.

Milk collection cups: Practical, but with limitations

Milk collection cups are another tool that mums often use to collect leaking milk. They are placed directly in the bra and collect the milk that leaks out during breastfeeding or between nursing sessions.

Disadvantages of milk collection cups

⦁ Problems with size and pressure marks: Depending on the size and shape of the breast, the cups do not always fit well in every bra, which can lead to pressure marks and discomfort. There is also a risk that the small openings for the nipple can block the milk ducts.
⦁ Leaks when moving: When moving, especially when bending down, the cups can slip and milk can spill through the opening.
⦁ Skin irritation: The cups can cause skin irritation or minor injuries due to friction, especially on sensitive skin. The moist environment can also favour skin irritation or infections if worn for very long periods.

General cleaning issues

What both products, silicone breast pumps and milk collection trays, have in common is that they might be difficult to clean, depending on their design.

Milk residue can remain in the corners and grooves, which can affect hygiene. Regular and thorough cleaning is essential to ensure the safety and health of mother and child. As the kindestCup consists of only one part and has a very large opening, cleaning is very easy.

Conclusion

In my practice, I have found that each product has its individual advantages and disadvantages.

The kindestCup offers an innovative and convenient solution for collecting and feeding breast milk, while silicone breast pumps and milk collection bowls are established but not perfect aids.

The kindestCup convinced me of its suitability for everyday use, particularly with regard to its multifunctionality.

Not everything always runs smoothly in the life of a young mother, so little tools like this can make life a lot easier.

Find out more about kindestCup at kindestcup.com

Pregnancy

Women’s health strategy a ‘missed opportunity,’ RCM says

Published

on

The Royal College of Midwives (RCM) has referred to the women’s health strategy as a ‘missed opportunity’ to address maternity services. 

The renewed strategy was released by the government this week, with the aim of putting women’s experiences at the centre of care and ensuring they are “better heard and served”.

However, the government stated that because of ongoing investigations into maternity services across the country, the strategy “does not seek to address safety in maternity and neonatal services”.

The RCM described this as a “missed opportunity” and urged the government to ensure that, following the inquiries, maternity is placed “at the very heart” of the strategy.

Gill Walton, RCM chief executive, said the college was “deeply disappointed” that maternity services “do not feature as a headline priority” in the renewed strategy.

She said: “This is a significant missed opportunity and one that is very difficult to understand.

“Pregnancy, birth and the postnatal period are not a footnote in women’s health – they are one of the most significant and consequential phases of a woman’s life.

“A strategy that treats maternity as an afterthought is not truly a women’s health strategy at all. It is exactly the kind of thinking that has allowed maternity services to reach the point they are at today.”

Walton acknowledged that the strategy contained commitments on ensuring women’s voices shape their care, on supporting families through pregnancy loss and on the principle that services should be held accountable when they fail to listen to women.

She added: “But a strategy that addresses one part of women’s health while leaving maternity care behind is only doing half the job.”

Walton urged the government to ensure that this is addressed when the ongoing investigations into maternity care conclude, with any recommendations placed “at the very heart of this strategy with the seriousness and urgency that women, families and midwives deserve”.

In the foreword to the renewed plans, health and social care secretary Wes Streeting referred to the ongoing independent National Maternity and Neonatal Investigation as action being taken by the government to improve safety in maternity services.

The strategy also refers to the new National Maternity and Neonatal Taskforce, chaired by Streeting, which aims to help deliver “safer, more equitable care” for women, babies and families.

The foreword said that, because of ongoing initiatives, it was “important that this work continues without restriction and that the government can properly respond to the findings”.

It added: “This renewed women’s health strategy therefore does not seek to address safety in maternity and neonatal services other than that related to women’s health before and during pregnancy and the actions we are taking immediately to improve maternity and neonatal care.”

The strategy does, however, include plans to prioritise health education in schools, communities and healthcare settings to “empower women” with the “knowledge and tools they need to help control their fertility” and “prepare for the best pregnancy outcomes.

It also promises to provide women with access to “safe and high-quality contraception, abortion care, fertility services, preconception care and support after pregnancy loss in convenient settings.

Continue Reading

Pregnancy

Scotland to publish dedicated miscarriage patient charter

Published

on

Scotland is set to publish the UK’s first dedicated miscarriage patient charter, giving women and families clear information on NHS care and support.

Commissioned by the Scottish Government and developed with baby-loss charities Tommy’s, Held In Our Hearts and the Miscarriage Association, the charter sets out minimum standards for compassionate, clinically appropriate and culturally competent miscarriage care across Scotland.

It builds on the Scottish Government’s Delivery Framework for Miscarriage Care, which has already changed practice across NHS boards.

Jenni Minto, Scottish public health and women’s health minister, said: “Miscarriage is devastating, and for too long women have not had the care and support they deserve.

“That is changing. Scotland will become the first country in the UK to publish a miscarriage patient charter, meaning women know exactly how they will be supported by health services following their loss.”

Unlike previous UK-wide norms, where women were typically offered enhanced support only after three miscarriages, Scotland’s approach means women can receive appropriate support after their first miscarriage.

The charter also sets out clear rights and expectations so every woman, regardless of location or circumstance, understands the care she should receive.

It includes access to private rooms in hospitals rather than busy clinical areas or maternity settings, progesterone treatment where clinically appropriate, compassionate and culturally competent bereavement support, and clear information in 18 languages, including British Sign Language and audio formats.

Progesterone is a hormone that growing evidence suggests may help reduce the risk of miscarriage in certain cases when given to women who meet specific clinical criteria.

The Scottish Government said the charter is designed to ensure personalised, respectful care and to address long-standing inequalities experienced by women during miscarriage.

It is intended to provide clarity on the support women can expect, consistent standards across all NHS boards, stronger awareness and confidence among healthcare professionals, and better access to emotional and practical support services.

Charities involved in its development said many women still report feeling dismissed, uninformed or unsupported during miscarriage.

They said the new charter marks an important step towards making sure every woman feels heard, respected and cared for.

The charter aligns with Scotland’s wider Women’s Health Plan, which is improving care across reproductive, menstrual, maternal and perinatal health.

Recent national developments include greater investment in women’s health services, improved training for healthcare staff, new digital and in-person support tools, and targeted action to reduce inequalities in access and outcomes.

Together, these measures aim to create a more compassionate and equitable women’s health system.

Minto said: “This charter is a landmark moment.

“It tells women clearly what they should expect from their NHS, and it holds services to account for delivering it.

“Scotland is leading the way, and I am proud of the progress NHS boards and our charity partners have made together.”

The model is expected to inform wider UK discussions on miscarriage support, bereavement care and early pregnancy services.

The charter will be made publicly available, offering women, partners and families clear guidance on their rights and the standards they can expect when seeking care.

Continue Reading

Motherhood

The maternity care crisis hiding in plain sight

Published

on

By Adrianne Nickerson, founder and CEO, Oula

The numbers get the headlines. Maternal mortality rates. Access deserts. Workforce shortages. These are real and urgent problems, but they’re not the whole story.

There’s a quieter breakdown happening inside routine appointments, and it’s driving outcomes in ways that never show up in formal reports.

Women describe maternity care that feels rushed and transactional.

They talk about repeating their medical history at every visit, leaving appointments with questions they never got to ask, and receiving advice so generic it doesn’t seem to account for their actual lives.

These aren’t just complaints about bedside manner. They’re signals that the system is losing the thread, and when that happens, clinical risk follows.

A patient who doesn’t feel heard may decide a new symptom isn’t worth mentioning.

A patient who leaves an appointment without clear next steps may wait too long to call when something changes. These small moments of disconnection are where complications quietly take shape.

The system is structured to rush

This isn’t about individual clinicians failing women. It’s about a care model built around short, physician-led visits with limited coordination across roles — applied to pregnancies that are often medically and emotionally complex.

Clinicians are covering more ground in less time, and patients feel that compression. Women in marginalised communities feel it most acutely.

Reports of dismissal and bias are well-documented, and the consequences compound: when trust erodes, communication breaks down, and the window for early intervention narrows.

What women are actually asking for

Younger women in particular are entering maternity care with different expectations. They want explanations for recommendations, not just instructions.

They want to understand tradeoffs and have their preferences carry forward from one visit to the next. They’re not looking to reduce medical oversight, they’re looking for care that makes sense as a whole.

That’s driving real interest in collaborative care models that bring OBs, midwives, nurses, and behavioural health professionals into a coordinated framework.

When roles are clear and communication is shared rather than siloed, the experience changes, and so do outcomes.

Experience is clinical performance

Health systems are sophisticated at tracking infection rates and readmissions. The experience of care deserves the same level of attention, because it’s often where the clinical picture first starts to slip.

The fixes aren’t mysterious. A longer first visit can prevent confusion that compounds over months. Integrated mental health support surfaces concerns that might otherwise go unspoken.

Clear communication across the care team eliminates the mixed messages that erode confidence.

Postpartum services like pelvic floor therapy and lactation support – when easy to access and clearly explained – extend the impact of care well beyond delivery.

Workforce shortages and financial pressure make all of this harder. They also make it more urgent.

When women feel respected and informed, they raise concerns earlier, follow care plans more consistently, and seek help sooner.

That’s not a soft outcome – that’s how complications get prevented.

Simply put: adjusting how care is delivered is one of the most direct ways to improve clinical outcomes.

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025 Aspect Health Media Ltd. All Rights Reserved.