Connect with us

Special

6 things a gynaecologist wants you to know about endometriosis

By Dr Nitish Narvekar, fertility consultant at King’s Fertility and consultant gynaecologist at King’s College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust

Published

on

Despite the fact that endometriosis affects an estimated one in 10 women and girls globally, the condition is still widely misunderstood.

This Endometriosis Awareness Month, Dr Nitish Narvekar, clinical director and consultant gynaecologist at King’s College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, discusses why endometriosis goes undiagnosed for years and shares what you should know about the condition.

What is endometriosis?

Endometriosis is a chronic debilitating inflammatory condition affecting up to 10 per cent of patients in their reproductive (puberty to menopause) years which equates to approximately over 1.5 million in the UK and 176 million globally.

The disease, where endometrial-like tissue grows outside the uterus, costs approximately £8bn per year to the UK economy in healthcare costs and loss of amenity.

Whilst the classic symptom is pelvic pain of varying intensity, duration and location, it can present with a range of other symptoms and conditions.

Signs and symptoms of endometriosis
  • Pain before and/or during periods (dysmenorrhea)
  • Pain during or after sex
  • Pain on opening bowels
  • Pain on passing urine
  • More frequent or urgent need to open bowels especially during periods
  • More frequent or urgent need to pass urine or waking up many times at night to pass urine
  • Blood in stools
  • Blood in urine
  • Cyclical chest pain and/or cough
  • Fatigue
  • Infertility > 6 months, especially if any of above is also present

Diagnosis is often delayed by eight to nine years due to lack of awareness by patients and care providers in all settings. Therefore, it is not uncommon for patients to be first diagnosed often fortuitously when undergoing a pelvic USS (ultrasound scan) or MRI (magnetic resonance imaging) when investigating other conditions, for example infertility.

USS is type of scan which uses high-frequency sound waves to create images of internal tissues/organs, whereas MRI uses strong magnetic fields and radio waves to produce such images.

Endometriosis and infertility

Whilst endometriosis is found in up to 50 per cent of patients with infertility, it is usually causative in patients with active disease and/or involvement of the fallopian tubes or ovaries. Whilst medical hormonal therapies are effective, they are not compatible with fertility and therefore many patients with complex endometriosis have to resort to surgery to improve fertility outcomes.

However, surgery carries attendant risks of trauma to bowel and urinary tract (also known as complications), and moreover, patients may experience delays in resuming fertility whilst recovering fully from surgery especially if it is complex.

Laparoscopy and endometriosis

Laparoscopy is a type of surgery which allows a surgeon to use keyhole cuts and a camera for procedures inside the tummy or pelvis.  It is the “gold standard” test for diagnosis and treatment of endometriosis and although invasive in nature is highly safe and effective.

Robotic surgery and endometriosis

Robotic surgery is a type of keyhole surgery undertaken using specialised camera and instruments which are inserted through keyhole cuts but unlike in laparoscopy these are controlled by a surgeon who sits at an ergonomically designed console away from the patient but otherwise in the same theatre.

Robotic surgery has been successfully introduced for routine gynaecological use in selected NHS clinics, for example King’s Fertility, and given its advantages, which include reduced complication rates and blood loss and faster recovery, has revolutionised surgical care of patients including when compared with traditional laparoscopy.

Whilst robotic surgery should be available to all patients, its use is limited by higher costs and limited availability and therefore at present reserved for managing patients with complex surgical and anaesthetic needs.

Another lesser known and heralded advantage of robotic surgery over and above other forms of surgery, including laparoscopy, is the greater ergonomics and intuitiveness it provides which in-turn results in reduced surgeon fatigue especially for complex cases. This in the long-run will improve working life and retention of surgeons at a time of greatest need within the NHS.

The pros of robotic surgery 

  • Greater precision
  • Superior 3D HD vision
  • Minimum tissue trauma
  • Nerve sparing
  • Lower blood loss and complications
  • Less post-operative pain
  • Reduced hospital stay
  • Quicker recovery
  • More ergonomic for the surgeon and reduced surgeon fatigue

The cons of robotic surgery

  • Higher capital costs
  • Rigorous quality and safety controls
  • Only available in select clinics and hospitals
What should women do?

All patients, including adolescents, should familiarise themselves with symptoms and signs of endometriosis and seek a GP appointment accordingly.

Where appropriate, patients should seek a high-quality pelvic USS, but, equally be aware that a negative USS does not rule out endometriosis and therefore, in case of persistent symptoms, seek additional MRI and/or laparoscopy and/or empirical treatments.

Patients with endometriosis should seek referral to a fertility clinic to discuss the nature of their condition and its impact on fertility. Many, but not all, fertility clinics provide high quality pelvic USS during initial diagnostic work-up and therefore benefit from quicker and more accurate diagnosis of endometriosis including deep and/or complex endometriosis.

Women with ovarian endometriosis and even otherwise, should consider preserving fertility by recourse to egg/embryo freezing where applicable.

Patients with severe and/or complex forms of endometriosis should request referral to their local BSGE (British Society of Gynaecological Endoscopy) accredited endometriosis centre.  Where possible they should enquire about availability of robotic surgery in such centres.

To receive the Femtech World newsletter, sign up here.

Features

HIV research paves way for new ovarian cancer therapies

Published

on

HIV research has identified a new target for ovarian cancer by selectively blocking a cleft in the retinoblastoma protein that protects tumour-supporting macrophages.

The discovery could make ovarian – and potentially other – cancers more responsive to immunotherapies, treatments that use the body’s immune system to fight disease.

Scientists at the Wistar Institute found that targeting a specific cleft in the retinoblastoma protein removed only tumour-supporting macrophages while sparing those that fight disease.

Macrophages are immune cells that can either attack tumours or shield them from harm.

The work builds on decades of HIV studies led by Dr Luis Montaner, executive vice president of the Wistar Institute and director of its HIV Cure and Viral Diseases Center.

Montaner said: “This target emerged from our work understanding how macrophages survive HIV infection.

“It shows how insights from one field of medicine can inform breakthroughs in another.”

Targeting tumour-protecting macrophages without harming beneficial ones has long been a challenge.

Wistar researchers showed that selectively inhibiting this protein cleft depleted only tumour-supporting macrophages, leaving protective immune cells intact. Animal studies confirmed tumour shrinkage using this approach.

Montaner said: “This is a first-in-kind target against a solid tumour.

“It opens new avenues for therapies that could complement existing immunotherapies.”

The study highlights the value of long-term, cross-disciplinary research. It took more than 10 years from the initial HIV-linked finding to identifying this cancer target.

Next steps include exploring applications in acute myeloid leukaemia, pancreatic cancer and combination therapies.

Continue Reading

News

US incineration of contraceptives denies 1.4m African women and girls lifesaving care, NGO says

Published

on

The US decision to incinerate US$9.7m worth of contraceptives is expected to result in 174,000 unintended pregnancies and 56,000 unsafe abortions across five African countries.

The medical supplies, many of which were not due to expire until between 2027 and 2029, would have supported more than 1.4 million women and girls in the Democratic Republic of Congo, Kenya, Tanzania, Zambia and Mali.

The products had already been manufactured, packaged and prepared for delivery. Around 77 per cent were earmarked for distribution in the five African nations.

The International Planned Parenthood Federation (IPPF), a global healthcare provider and advocate for sexual and reproductive rights, offered to take the contraceptives for redistribution at no cost to US taxpayers. The offer was declined.

IPPF said the decision would deny women and girls in the affected countries access to lifesaving care.

Tanzania will be hardest hit, losing more than 1 million injectable doses and 365,100 implants – small devices inserted under the skin that release hormones to prevent pregnancy.

This amounts to 28 per cent of the country’s total annual contraceptive need.

Dr Bakari, project coordinator at Umati, IPPF’s member association in Tanzania, said: “We are facing a major challenge.

“The impact of the USAID funding cuts has already significantly affected the provision of sexual and reproductive health services in Tanzania, leading to a shortage of contraceptive commodities, especially implants.

“This shortage has directly impacted clients’ choices regarding family planning uptake.”

In Mali, women will lose access to 1.2 million oral contraceptive pills and 95,800 implants, nearly one-quarter of the country’s annual requirement.

In Zambia, 48,400 implants and 295,000 injectable doses will no longer be available. In Kenya, 108,000 women will go without contraceptive implants.

Marie Evelyne Petrus-Barry, IPPF’s Africa regional director, called the move “appalling and extremely wasteful”.

She said: “These lifesaving medical supplies were destined to countries where access to reproductive care is already limited, and in some cases, part of a broader humanitarian response, such as in the DRC.

“The choice to incinerate them is unjustifiable.”

In Kenya, the cuts compound an already strained system.

Nelly Munyasia, executive director of the Reproductive Health Network in Kenya, said stocks of long-term contraceptives had already run out, and warned of further consequences.

She said: “There is a 46 per cent funding gap in Kenya’s national family planning programme,.

“These systemic setbacks come at a time when unmet need for contraception remains high. Nearly one in five girls aged 15 to 19 are already pregnant or has given birth.

“Unsafe abortions remain among the five leading causes of maternal deaths in Kenya.”

Munyasia also warned that health workers’ skills are being eroded and said a lack of contraceptive access would increase maternal deaths as more women seek unsafe abortions.

While Kenya’s 2010 constitution allows abortion when a pregnant person’s life or health is at risk, the 1963 penal code still criminalises the procedure.

As a result, healthcare providers often avoid offering abortion care, even in emergencies.

A US state department spokesperson confirmed last month that the decision to destroy the supplies had been authorised.

Reports indicated the products were to be incinerated in France, prompting the French government to say it was “following the situation closely” following objections from rights and family planning groups.

The state department said the contraceptives could not be sold or donated to “eligible buyers” due to US legal restrictions, which prohibit foreign aid to organisations that provide abortion services, counsel on abortion, or advocate for abortion rights overseas.

Continue Reading

Mental health

Gates foundation pledges $2.5bn to ‘ignored’ women’s health issues

Published

on

The Gates Foundation will invest US$2.5bn in women’s health research by 2030, it announced on Monday, focusing on conditions from preeclampsia to menopause.

The pledge is around one-third more than the foundation spent on women’s and maternal health research and development over the past five years.

It is also among the first major commitments since Bill Gates said he would give away his US$200bn fortune by 2045.

Gates said: “Women’s health continues to be ignored, underfunded and sidelined. Too many women still die from preventable causes or live in poor health,” said Gates.

“That must change.”

The new funding will support research into under-studied conditions affecting hundreds of millions of women in both high- and low-income countries.

These include preeclampsia – a pregnancy complication that causes high blood pressure – and gestational diabetes, as well as heavy menstrual bleeding, endometriosis and menopause.

Investment will focus on five priority areas: obstetric care and maternal immunisation; maternal health and nutrition; gynaecological and menstrual health; contraceptive innovation; and research into sexually transmitted infections.

The aim is to kickstart research, develop new products, and ensure equitable global access to treatments.

Just one per cent of healthcare research and innovation spending goes to female-specific conditions beyond cancer, according to a 2021 analysis by McKinsey & Co.

Dr Anita Zaidi, the foundation’s head of gender equality, said the field has been held back by data gaps and bias.

She noted that key questions remain unanswered – including how some medicines interact with the uterus.

She told Reuters: “If you look at the literature, there may be only 10 women who’ve been studied, ever.

“We don’t even have the answers to these basic questions.”

Zaidi said the US$2.5bn pledge is a “drop in the bucket” compared to what is needed, and called on governments, philanthropists and the private sector to step in.

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025 Aspect Health Media Ltd. All Rights Reserved.