Insight
What the NHS 10-Year Health Plan means for women and where it “falls short”

The government’s 10-year plan for the NHS promises bold transformation, with a move towards digital innovation, and more focus on prevention over treatment, but does it go far enough to address the UK’s gender health gap?
Health Secretary Wes Streeting has revealed his vision for the UK’s public healthcare system, promising to transform the NHS over the next decade, in the government’s Fit for the Future report.
From a renewed focus on maternity care, to ambitions to eliminate cervical cancer by 2040, the government says its 10-year plan will play a fundamental role in delivering its commitment to women’s health “never again being ignored”.
Currently, the UK has the largest gender health gap in the G20, with the average woman spending nearly a quarter of her life in poor health compared to a fifth for men.
Yet while the plan has been described as a “strong foundation”, crucial details about how its promises will be delivered are yet to be published, and some say the lack of specific action to address the gender health gap mean it may “fall short” for women.
Community, prevention and digitisation— what the government has promised
The NHS 10 year plan is underpinned by three key pillars; a move from hospital to community, sickness to prevention and from analogue to digital.
A focus on prevention, rather than sickness, promises to deliver better access to screening, and allow better use of health data to enable more predictive and pre-emptive care.
Plans to increase uptake of HPV vaccinations aim to help the NHS reach its ambitious target of eliminating cervical cancer by 2040. Meanwhile, universal newborn genomic testing and an introduction to polygenic risk scoring will be used to identify potential risks to child and maternal health early and help predict susceptibility to diseases.
The government has also committed to a national independent investigation into maternity and neonatal services, setting out plans for the establishment of a national maternity and neonatal taskforce, chaired by the Secretary of State, as well as a national action plan co-produced with bereaved families.
Placing more focus on neighbourhood health centres, rather than hospital treatment, will enable more people to access health services closer to home, according to the proposals, while an increased focus on the digitalisation of the NHS aims to make services faster, more convenient, and more personalised.
All patients will gain access to a single, digital health record, and the NHS app will be expanded allowing patients to book appointments, manage long-term conditions, reproductive health and medications, and coordinate care for children or elderly family members.
My Children, a digital alternative to what has been known for decades in maternity care as the ‘red book’ also aims to make it easier to manage children’s healthcare and medical records.
Speaking following the publication of the plan on Thursday 3 July, Streeting described this as a “meaningful advancement”, giving parents “practical tools when they need them most”.
“This isn’t just about convenience… It’s about recognising the realities of modern parenthood and removing unnecessary barriers to good healthcare,” he said.
“From offering timely, advice about feeding and weaning in those first months to providing guidance about adolescent mental health years later, this digital companion adapts to your family’s changing needs.”
Where the plan “falls short” on women’s health
The plan’s proposals for maternity care have been welcomed by the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG), with many women not receiving the “personalised, high-quality care they deserve”.
However, president, Professor Ranee Thakar, has suggested it lacks clarity on how it will address many of the the issues contributing to the gender health gap.
“While the plan lays strong foundations, it falls short in pledging to eliminate the gender health gap that is costing women years of life and good health,” Prof Thakar said in statement on Thursday.
“Today’s plan must mark a move away from treating women’s health as a collection of niche issues towards offering women excellent, joined-up care across their life course, with investment in the women’s health workforce, Femtech and research.”
Despite the fact that one in three women in the UK will suffer from a reproductive or gynaecological problem, less than 2.5 per cent of publicly funded research is dedicated solely to reproductive health.
Thakar added: “A huge opportunity may be missed without a clear focus on delivering better for women. We would like to see the Women’s Health Strategy for England reset quickly, to work alongside the 10-Year Plan in driving improvements in women’s health access, experiences and outcomes, particularly for minority ethnic women and those in the most socially deprived areas.”
The Women’s Health Strategy, developed and published in 2022, promised to address the inequalities in the health and care system, by providing better care for menstrual and gynaecological conditions, expanding women’s health hubs, improving maternity care and accelerating research into women’s health.
Some have been critical of the roll out of the strategy, accusing the former Conservative government of using it as a “short-term vote winner” and failing to fund it properly. A total of £25m was allocated to fund one-stop-shop women’s health hubs across the country for two years, compared to £240m which was spent on the Rwanda deportation scheme.
The role of women’s health hubs
The RCOG has called for the acceleration of women’s health hubs, which its believes could play a “crucial role” in establishing the neighbourhood care model which Streeting has promised in his 10-year plan.
Hubs bring healthcare services together, making the referral process easier and allowing women to see see different specialists, therapists and diagnostic teams under one roof, which can be beneficial for those managing complex symptoms or chronic health issues.
However according to Dr Nikki Kanani, a GP specialising in women’s health and a former director of primary care for NHS England, many are still in the pilot stage and services are stretched due to a lack of healthcare professionals trained in women’s health.
“What we need to do is follow through on the commitment of the strategy, to understand what good looks like and invest in scaling that,” she tells Femtech World.
“We need to treat hubs as a core part of the system, not just a side project,” she tells Femtech World.
“We need to understand what good looks like and invest in scaling that. That needs to be clearly set out with nationally-protected funding and ICB accountability. We need to upscale across primary care, we need roles that reflect the breadth of the knowledge that’s needed, and we need protected time for clinicians to work in these spaces.”
Dr Kanani also believes hubs also need to move beyond focusing on reproductive issues to other areas of healthcare where women are traditonally “dismissed” and “deprioritised”, such as cardiovascular care and mental health services.
Alongside this, incentivised targets for gender and ethnicity gaps in diagnosis, referrals and outcomes, as well as system-wide women’s health leads, could be practical next steps to ensure women’s health is prioritised across the NHS, Dr Kanani says.
Increased investment in private innovators
The government has promised to embrace technologies such as AI, genomics, wearables and robotics, to improve clinical outcomes and reduce clinician workload, which could see a shift towards more public-private partnerships in the NHS and more investment in private innovators.
Dr Kanani says this would be “welcome”, but innovators seeking NHS partnerships, especially in the women’s health space, will need to consider factors such as regulator requirements, responsible data-gathering and the practicalities of training clinicians.
“Any femtech company innovating a point of care solution should be thinking not just of their tool, but also how their tool improves decision-making, documentation and communication, she says.
“We can roll out thousands of tools, but frontline clinicians are understandably time-poor. Part of your job as a responsible innovator, is to say ‘here is my solution, let’s train you and make sure it’s easy to use and deploy’.”
Equity needs more than strategy
The promises of the 10-year plan are bold and ambitious, but how effective it will be— especially for women— remains to be seen.
A planned chapter explaining how the proposed changes would be delivered was not published alongside the rest of the plan on Thursday, and is now expected later this year.
Dr Kanani says how the plan is delivered will be crucial in determining how far it goes to improve women’s healthcare.
“There are some important steps in the 10-year plan, but health equity for women, particularly those from minoritised, marginalised and underserved communities, won’t be achieved through strategy alone. We need a really deep, system-wide culture shift,” she says.
“Equity needs more than just the narrative of equal access, it needs tailored design. Care models, research, workforce, all need to be actively built around these women and communities.”
Dr Kanani adds: “It could be transformational for women, but only if it’s designed intentionally around the realities of women’s lives.”
News
Women shouldering hidden burden of navigating healthcare system – study

Women face a hidden burden navigating healthcare, with many repeatedly retelling their medical history, a national study suggests.
The findings indicate that Canadian women are taking on cognitive, emotional and administrative work alongside managing their health, including coordinating providers and advocating for care.
More than half of women surveyed, 53 per cent, reported a past or current chronic condition, while 64 per cent said there were health topics they struggled to raise with their doctor.
Sarah Hoffman, president and CEO of Pacific Blue Cross, said: “These findings challenge us to think differently about women’s healthcare and highlight the hidden work required to navigate the system.
“For many women, managing their health has also come to mean managing the healthcare system itself.
“They are acting as project managers of their own care, shouldering the invisible labour of coordinating between providers, retelling their medical history and advocating to be heard.
“The gap between men and women is meaningful and raises important questions about why younger women report lower levels of confidence and support.
“It also challenges us to consider whether we are actually making progress in women’s care, and whether the next generation is being equipped with the confidence and voice to advocate for their health.”
Overall, 71 per cent of Canadians described their doctors as supportive and 88 per cent expected their appointments to go well.
Among women living with chronic conditions, 71 per cent reported having to repeat their complete health history multiple times a year.
Younger women were particularly likely to report difficulties discussing their health. The study found 81 per cent of Gen Z women aged 18 to 30 and 73 per cent of Millennial women aged 31 to 45 had health topics they struggled to raise with their doctor.
Among Gen Z women with chronic illness, 92 per cent reported having to repeat their complete health history.
The study also found differences between young women and men. While 95 per cent of Gen Z men expected a doctor’s appointment to go well, the figure was 82 per cent among Gen Z women.
Similarly, 82 per cent of Gen Z men said they felt supported by their family doctor, compared with 66 per cent of Gen Z women.
Reasons for holding back health concerns varied between generations.
Among Gen Z women, 30 per cent cited fear of dismissal and 29 per cent fear of judgement.
Embarrassment was the most common barrier among Millennial, Gen X and Boomer women, reported by 29 per cent, 27 per cent and 35 per cent respectively.
Women who felt they needed to prove themselves to be taken seriously said they adapted how they approached appointments.
Strategies included researching medical information, repeatedly describing or justifying symptoms, bringing written notes or documentation, tracking symptom timelines, making repeat visits and emphasising how symptoms affected their daily lives.
The study also found an association between feeling supported by a doctor and expecting appointments to go well.
Canadians who described their physician as supportive were nearly four times more likely to expect appointments to go well than those who felt unsupported, at 98 per cent compared with 25 per cent.
Overall, 66 per cent of Canadians said they described their symptoms accurately. This fell to 48 per cent among those who said they felt unsupported by their doctor.
The 2026 Blue Cross Women’s Health Study surveyed 2,045 adult Canadians online in March 2026 through independent research company Research + Knowledge = Insights.
The survey had a reported margin of error of plus or minus 2 per cent, 19 times out of 20.
Insight
Court recognises radiation as factor in flight attendant’s breast cancer
Insight
Study to tackle years-long delays in endometriosis diagnosis

A study is examining where delays occur in diagnosing endometriosis – a condition that can take seven to twelve years to diagnose.
Endometriosis affects an estimated 1.5 million women and people in the UK, but there is currently no consistent way of measuring where and why diagnostic delays happen.
The research aims to develop the first standardised framework for understanding the diagnostic journey and identifying points where interventions could improve care.
The international project involves researchers from the University of Sheffield, University of Liverpool, University of Oxford, Aarhus University in Denmark and the University of Edinburgh, alongside Endometriosis UK.
Dr Rebecca Mawson, NIHR clinical lecturer in primary care at the University of Sheffield, is part of the research team.
She said: “Our project asks: where exactly are people getting lost or let down on their journey to diagnosis, and how can we map those points in a systematic way to identify where interventions could make a real difference.”
The project is led by Dr Babu Karavadra, NIHR academic clinical fellow in general practice at the University of Liverpool, who has been awarded a World Endometriosis Society Early Career Investigator Award as lead principal investigator at the University of Liverpool.
Researchers will review existing evidence, gather experiences from people living with endometriosis and bring together an international panel to map the diagnostic pathway and agree common definitions for key points along the journey.
The work will focus particularly on people whose experiences are often missing from research, including Black women, people living in rural or deprived areas, LGBTQ+ communities and disabled people.
Primary care will also be central to the research because it is often where people first seek help with symptoms.
Mawson said: “Primary care needs to be at the heart of this work. Primary care is often where people first seek help with their symptoms, so it has a crucial role in understanding diagnostic delay.
“If we only look at what happens once someone reaches specialist gynaecology, we risk missing some of the barriers that shape the journey long before that point.”
Unlike cancer research, where internationally recognised standards exist for studying diagnostic delays, endometriosis research has been more fragmented, with studies measuring different parts of the diagnostic journey in different ways.
The researchers hope to create an ‘Endometriosis Diagnostic Pathway Framework’ to help identify where people are falling through the gaps and where healthcare could be improved.
They will also develop a ‘Snakes and Ladders’ style visual representation showing how systemic barriers, chance and individual experiences can influence whether someone reaches a diagnosis.
The project forms part of the PEARL network, Primary care Endometriosis and Adenomyosis Research and Learning, an international collaboration of primary care and community researchers and clinicians.
Mawson said: “Endometriosis diagnostic delay isn’t inevitable. If we can understand where and why people are experiencing barriers, we have a much better chance of designing interventions that actually make a difference.
“The scale of the problem demands that we look at the whole journey, listen to the people experiencing it and build an evidence base that can lead to real change.”
The framework could provide the foundations for future research, clinical guideline development, healthcare professional training and NHS service improvements, with potential applications to related conditions such as adenomyosis and chronic pelvic pain.
Hormonal health2 weeks agoMajor UK study could be a ‘game-changer’ for heavy periods and endometriosis
Entrepreneur7 days agoKOVE Medical raises €1.7 million to improve safety of foetal surgery
Fertility2 weeks agoOne week left to apply: W Accelerate with Merck KGaA and M Ventures
Pregnancy1 week agoUK study aims to transform maternity care for high-risk pregnancies
Menopause2 weeks agoQuarter of women miss work due to menstual symptoms, survey finds
Mental health2 weeks agoPMDD after SSRIs or hormones: Why the brain may be the missing treatment target
Diagnosis2 weeks agoArk Surgical secures further institutional backing to accelerate US expansion
Menopause5 days agoMenopause hormone treatment may ease brain fog, study suggests













