Motherhood
Age, economic status and religiosity drive LGB patients to grow families, study suggests

Age, economic status, number of children and religiosity — are the key predictors of LGB parents’ desire to expand their families, new research has found.
In contrast to the findings of previous studies, experiences of discrimination, stigma, and social support were not found to have a significant impact on parental aspirations.
The researchers now aim to further explore the reasons behind these findings.
The research team explored the desire, intention, and assessment of the likelihood of having additional children among LGB individuals who are already parents.
The study is the first to focus on the motivations for family expansion among LGB parents.
It examined three measures of parental aspirations — desire, intention, and estimated probability — in the context of parenthood achieved through fertility treatments.
Dr Geva Shenkman Lachberg, is from the Dina Recanati School of Medicine.
The researcher said: “The current study is particularly relevant in the Israeli context — a country that reveres childbirth and parenthood, with one of the highest average numbers of children among OECD countries.
“Israel is also known for its widespread use of assisted reproductive technologies and generous government funding, including nearly unlimited cycles of fertility treatment.
“Within this ‘parenting empire’, it is important to understand what motivates LGB parents to have more children — especially given the significant challenges they have faced over the years, such as restrictions on surrogacy in Israel.”
The study included 234 LGB parents with an average age of 40.23, surveyed between November 2022 and February 2024.
Participants completed questionnaires addressing a wide range of factors that may influence the motivation to have additional children.
The variables examined included sociodemographic characteristics (parent’s age, gender, education level, economic status, religiosity, marital status, number of children, and place of residence); factors related to perceptions of the parental role (investment in parenting, satisfaction with parenting, sense of parental competence, and parental integration); social variables (social support, experiences of discrimination, and stigma); as well as a cultural variable — pronatalism, which reflects sociocultural values that encourage childbirth and parenthood.
As one of the first studies to examine motivations for having additional children among LGB parents, the researchers based their hypotheses on previous findings from studies conducted among LGB individuals who were not yet parents.
These earlier studies found that, alongside sociodemographic variables, social factors also had a significant impact.
For example, non-parent LGB individuals who experienced lower levels of social support and higher levels of stigma and discrimination reported lower desire and intention to become parents.
Accordingly, the researchers hypothesised that similar patterns would emerge among LGB parents — that exposure to stigma and discrimination or a lack of social support would be associated with decreased motivation to expand their families.
However, contrary to the initial hypothesis and previous findings from studies of non-parent LGB individuals, the current study found that only sociodemographic factors were significant predictors of motivation for additional children.
Younger parental age, fewer existing children, higher economic status, and greater religiosity were the only variables found to be associated with the desire, intention, and estimated likelihood of bringing additional children into the world.
In contrast, social support, stigma, discrimination, perceptions of the parental role, and pronatalist attitudes were not found to be significantly linked with aspirations for family expansion, once sociodemographic variables were accounted for within the statistical prediction model.
Lachberg said: “While previous studies have highlighted the impact of stigma, discrimination, and lack of social support on parenthood aspirations among sexual minorities, it seems that these factors carry less weight among LGB parents.
“It may be that after they have succeeded in becoming parents — effectively breaking the glass ceiling — they are accepted into the social consensus, and it is the sociodemographic factors that remain significant.
“In this sense, the emerging picture closely resembles the one we are familiar with among heterosexual parents.”
Motherhood
Natural birth pressure harming new mothers’ mental health, research finds

Pressure to have a natural birth can cause lasting psychological harm when labour does not go to plan, new research shows.
The study found that the messages women receive during pregnancy are directly linked to the shame and self-blame many feel when those expectations are not met.
For the first time, the research provides an explanation for why unmet birth expectations contribute to psychological harm.
Several women involved in the research said they felt they had not given birth “properly”, even when medical intervention had saved their lives.
Rebecca Matthews, lead author and PhD researcher at the University of Reading, said: “These women were not failed by their bodies, they were failed by the messages they were given.
“Birth trauma does not begin with birth. It begins in the ideology sold to women throughout pregnancy.
“For the first time we can explain precisely how, by showing how birth culture creates a moral standard for women that defines what a good mother does and then leaves them to blame themselves when birth does not match that.
“Until we reform the way we prepare women for birth, we will keep seeing the same devastating consequences for mothers and their babies.”
The researchers interviewed 21 first-time mothers in the UK whose births did not go as planned.
From NCT and hypnobirthing classes, to social media to midwives, the researchers heard how women are surrounded by messaging that frames natural, unmedicated vaginal birth as the “gold standard”, not just medically preferable, but as a mark of being a good mother and the first test of maternal worth.
Research shows around half of women report their birth differed significantly from their expectations, and for the women in this study, all of whom experienced exactly that, the psychological consequences were profound.
Women judged themselves against the internalised moral standard that this ideology had created.
The researchers are calling for antenatal education to stop treating one kind of birth as the goal and to present all birth outcomes as equally valid routes to motherhood.
They also call for better postnatal screening for women whose births did not go as expected, specifically targeting the shame, self-blame and identity disruption that this research identifies as mechanisms underlying birth trauma.
The findings align with and extend the conclusions of the Kirkup, Ockenden and Birth Trauma Inquiry reports, all of which documented how the institutional pursuit of “normal birth” contributed to preventable harm.
This research provides the first theoretical explanation of how that ideology generates individual psychological harm and points to antenatal messaging as the primary site of such preventable harm.
Pregnancy
Wales becomes first UK nation to unite maternity care under a single digital record

System C has completed the national rollout of BadgerNet Maternity across all seven NHS Health Boards in Wales. This is the first time any UK nation has unified its maternity care under a single digital record and patient-facing app.
With approximately 26,000 babies born annually in Wales, BadgerNet connects maternity information across organisational boundaries in the country.
Expectant parents can access their records, maternity appointments and key updates digitally through a single app, wherever they receive care while clinicians have secure access to the right information at the point of care.
The national three-year agreement across all Heath Boards replaces a patchwork of separate local systems and eliminates the need for paper hand-held notes.
Anthony Tracey is director of digital at Hywel Dda University Health Board, the final of the Welsh Health Boards to go live with BadgerNet.
He said: “The rollout of BadgerNet across Wales is a vitally important step forward in modernising our maternity services and providing a consistent service across the country.
“By giving expectant parents direct access to their information and enabling clinicians to share data more effectively, we are strengthening safety, transparency and consistency in maternity care nationwide.”
For expectant parents, the single digital maternity record transforms how they engage with their care.
Instead of carrying paper notes and repeating information at every appointment, parents can access key details, appointments and updates digitally, supporting more informed conversations and shared decision-making.
The result is greater transparency, fewer administrative frustrations and a more joined-up experience throughout pregnancy and into the postnatal period, regardless of which health board they fall under.
For clinicians and Health Boards, the joined-up approach reduces duplication and streamlines handovers across teams and sites. Information is digitally captured once and made available securely wherever it is needed, helping to minimise errors, reduce time spent tracking down notes and support more efficient multidisciplinary working.
At a national level, linking maternity data across Wales creates a foundation for safer, more consistent care.
Aggregated, standardised information enables earlier identification of trends and variation, supports evidence-based policy decisions and enhances long-term service planning.
With a comprehensive view of maternity activity and outcomes across the country, Wales is now better positioned to raise standards for parents, babies and families.
Guy Lucchi, managing director of healthcare at System C, added: “Delivering a truly national approach across all seven Health Boards is a significant achievement for Wales.
“One shared system means information flows with the patient, not the organisation.
“That reduces duplication, supports earlier identification of risk and frees up valuable clinical time.
“Crucially, linking maternity data at a national level provides powerful insight to drive improvement. Health Boards can benchmark, plan services with greater confidence and ensure resources are targeted where they are needed most, while expectant parents benefit from clearer communication and a more connected experience of care.”
Pregnancy
Early birth safer in high blood pressure pregnancies – study
Menopause1 week agoPerimenopause misinformation ‘putting women at risk’
Opinion4 weeks agoWhat Maternal Mental Health Month reveals about where postpartum support actually breaks down
News4 weeks agoNIH Grant terminations disproportionately impact minority scientists, research finds
Adolescent health4 weeks agoWUKA brings Period-Positive Pool Party to London Aquatics Centre to keep girls swimming through puberty
Insight3 weeks agoPCOS renamed after decade-long campaign to end ‘cyst’ misconception
Events4 weeks agoWHIS 2026 unveils agenda and first speakers for the leading women’s health summit
Menopause4 weeks agoCBT shows promise for menopause insomnia and hot flashes
Diagnosis2 weeks agoNHS urged to update website following renaming of PCOS










