Motherhood
What Maternal Mental Health Month reveals about where postpartum support actually breaks down

By Morgan Rose, chief science officer at Ema, and Lauren Scocozza, vice president of product at Willow
May is Maternal Mental Health Month, and every year it surfaces a familiar set of statistics: 1 in 5 new mothers experiences postpartum depression or anxiety, most go unscreened, and the majority who are screened don’t receive adequate follow-up care.
The conversation is important. But the numbers obscure something that anyone who has worked in this space knows to be true: postpartum mental health distress rarely arrives with a label.
It arrives as exhaustion. As “I’m not sure I’m doing this right.”
As a question about supply, pumping, whether it’s okay to feel this disconnected from something you were supposed to love immediately.
Willow integrated Ema, AI built for women’s health, with the goal of closing the maternal care and data gap.
The pattern mentioned above appears consistently in Ema’s conversational data through the Willow app.
A mother reports mastitis symptoms.
Ema walks her through the clinical presentation, confirms she should keep pumping, and then she questions if she is using her pump correctly. In the same thread, within a few exchanges, she says she’s “feeling too sad.” Then: “I don’t know. I think I’m depressed. I am not enjoying my postpartum.”
She did not come to the app to talk about her mental health.
She came about a breast infection. The mental health disclosure came through the already-opened door.
The Weight Underneath the Technical Question
New motherhood involves an enormous amount of problem-solving at a time when cognitive and emotional reserves are depleted. The pump has to work. The baby has to eat. The body has to recover.
Work comes back. Sleep doesn’t. Feeding their babies requires skill, and the learning curve sits atop it all.
What Ema’s conversation data shows is that the emotional load of navigating these challenges is not separate from mental health. It is mental health.
When a mother writes, “I’m postpartum and overwhelmed and tired,” and then, in the same breath, asks about flange sizing, she is telling us what the postpartum experience actually feels like from the inside.
The technical question and the emotional state are one and the same.
Breastfeeding carries particular weight here.
The desire to breastfeed, the guilt when it doesn’t go as planned, and the identity questions that come with feeding choices are not peripheral to the postpartum mental health conversation.
In our conversations, women navigating supply concerns often reveal deeper anxieties: about whether they are good mothers, whether their bodies are “working,” and whether the difficulty they are experiencing means something about them.
These are the signals worth asking about.
What Screening Looks Like in Practice
Ema is trained on the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale and is equipped to offer the EPDS when a conversation warrants it.
The value is being present for the moment when a woman is ready to name what she’s feeling.
That moment rarely comes as a direct request for mental health support. It comes when someone is already in a conversation about something else, and something shifts.
A woman dealing with mastitis says she feels sad. A woman worried about supply says she doesn’t feel like herself. A woman managing the logistics of going back to work with a wearable pump says she’s not sure she can keep up with it all — and the “it all” isn’t about the pump.
Ema is designed to hear that. She doesn’t stay on the clinical or technical track when the conversation moves. She follows the person.
And when the moment is right, she offers the screening as a natural next step.
In one exchange, a woman was offered the EPDS after disclosing depressive feelings. She declined.
Ema acknowledged that and asked if she wanted to talk about something else. That’s the right response. The offer was made without pressure. The door stays open.
Sometimes what matters most is that someone asked at all.
The Continuity Problem
One of the most persistent structural failures in maternal mental health care is fragmentation.
A woman sees her OB at six weeks postpartum for a brief screening. She may get a call from a nurse. She may be given a referral she never follows up on because she doesn’t have the capacity to navigate a new care relationship while managing a newborn.
The clinical touchpoints are too few, too far apart, and too often siloed from one another.
The postpartum period lasts far longer than the six-week checkup implies. Mental health symptoms can emerge weeks or months after delivery, shift in character over time, and interact with physical challenges in ways that don’t fit neatly into any single provider’s lane.
A lactation concern becomes an anxiety spiral. A supply drop triggers a grief response. A difficult return to work surfaces a postpartum depression that wasn’t fully recognized at six weeks.
Ema sits inside these moments because she’s embedded in the platform women are already using. She doesn’t require a separate appointment, a referral, or the cognitive bandwidth to seek out a new resource.
She’s in the Willow app that mom is already using multiple times a day to manage her pump.
When Ema identifies a woman who may need more support than she can provide, she routes to the right resource — whether that’s a SimpliFed lactation consultant for feeding-related concerns or a clinical professional for mental health follow-up.
The conversation leads to the handoff with someone who can do more.
What the Month of May Means for the Rest of the Year
Maternal Mental Health Month is a useful moment of attention. The awareness campaigns, the social media posts, and the statistics shared in newsletters matter.
But the gap in postpartum mental health care is not really an awareness problem.
Most people in the perinatal space and beyond know the statistics. The problem is access, timing, and continuity.
AI doesn’t close that gap on its own.
What it can do is be present in the spaces where women already are, at the times when they need something, and attentive enough to recognise that a conversation about a pump, a clogged duct, or a supply concern is also a conversation about how someone is doing.
The question behind the question is often the more important one.
For Willow, the conversation data Ema generates is a map of where mothers are struggling, what they reach for when they need help, and when they are ready to say more than they came to say.
That information, used well, shapes better resources, better onboarding, and a more connected experience across the full arc of the postpartum year and beyond.
Building the infrastructure to support maternal mental health is a year-round project.
Willow is doing one part of that, and the conversations happening on the Willow platform every day are evidence that women want support that meets them where they are… in their app, in their moment, without having to ask for it twice.
About the authors
Morgan Rose is Chief Science Officer at Ema, an AI platform for women’s health. Ema partners with healthcare organisations and femtech companies to deliver clinically grounded AI support across the perinatal journey.
Lauren Scocozza is the Vice President of Product at Willow Innovations, Inc. For women by women, Willow is building a maternal care platform to address the interconnected challenges of postpartum.
Pregnancy
Women’s health strategy a ‘missed opportunity,’ RCM says
Pregnancy
Scotland to publish dedicated miscarriage patient charter

Scotland is set to publish the UK’s first dedicated miscarriage patient charter, giving women and families clear information on NHS care and support.
Commissioned by the Scottish Government and developed with baby-loss charities Tommy’s, Held In Our Hearts and the Miscarriage Association, the charter sets out minimum standards for compassionate, clinically appropriate and culturally competent miscarriage care across Scotland.
It builds on the Scottish Government’s Delivery Framework for Miscarriage Care, which has already changed practice across NHS boards.
Jenni Minto, Scottish public health and women’s health minister, said: “Miscarriage is devastating, and for too long women have not had the care and support they deserve.
“That is changing. Scotland will become the first country in the UK to publish a miscarriage patient charter, meaning women know exactly how they will be supported by health services following their loss.”
Unlike previous UK-wide norms, where women were typically offered enhanced support only after three miscarriages, Scotland’s approach means women can receive appropriate support after their first miscarriage.
The charter also sets out clear rights and expectations so every woman, regardless of location or circumstance, understands the care she should receive.
It includes access to private rooms in hospitals rather than busy clinical areas or maternity settings, progesterone treatment where clinically appropriate, compassionate and culturally competent bereavement support, and clear information in 18 languages, including British Sign Language and audio formats.
Progesterone is a hormone that growing evidence suggests may help reduce the risk of miscarriage in certain cases when given to women who meet specific clinical criteria.
The Scottish Government said the charter is designed to ensure personalised, respectful care and to address long-standing inequalities experienced by women during miscarriage.
It is intended to provide clarity on the support women can expect, consistent standards across all NHS boards, stronger awareness and confidence among healthcare professionals, and better access to emotional and practical support services.
Charities involved in its development said many women still report feeling dismissed, uninformed or unsupported during miscarriage.
They said the new charter marks an important step towards making sure every woman feels heard, respected and cared for.
The charter aligns with Scotland’s wider Women’s Health Plan, which is improving care across reproductive, menstrual, maternal and perinatal health.
Recent national developments include greater investment in women’s health services, improved training for healthcare staff, new digital and in-person support tools, and targeted action to reduce inequalities in access and outcomes.
Together, these measures aim to create a more compassionate and equitable women’s health system.
Minto said: “This charter is a landmark moment.
“It tells women clearly what they should expect from their NHS, and it holds services to account for delivering it.
“Scotland is leading the way, and I am proud of the progress NHS boards and our charity partners have made together.”
The model is expected to inform wider UK discussions on miscarriage support, bereavement care and early pregnancy services.
The charter will be made publicly available, offering women, partners and families clear guidance on their rights and the standards they can expect when seeking care.
Motherhood
The maternity care crisis hiding in plain sight

By Adrianne Nickerson, founder and CEO, Oula
The numbers get the headlines. Maternal mortality rates. Access deserts. Workforce shortages. These are real and urgent problems, but they’re not the whole story.
There’s a quieter breakdown happening inside routine appointments, and it’s driving outcomes in ways that never show up in formal reports.
Women describe maternity care that feels rushed and transactional.
They talk about repeating their medical history at every visit, leaving appointments with questions they never got to ask, and receiving advice so generic it doesn’t seem to account for their actual lives.
These aren’t just complaints about bedside manner. They’re signals that the system is losing the thread, and when that happens, clinical risk follows.
A patient who doesn’t feel heard may decide a new symptom isn’t worth mentioning.
A patient who leaves an appointment without clear next steps may wait too long to call when something changes. These small moments of disconnection are where complications quietly take shape.
The system is structured to rush
This isn’t about individual clinicians failing women. It’s about a care model built around short, physician-led visits with limited coordination across roles — applied to pregnancies that are often medically and emotionally complex.
Clinicians are covering more ground in less time, and patients feel that compression. Women in marginalised communities feel it most acutely.
Reports of dismissal and bias are well-documented, and the consequences compound: when trust erodes, communication breaks down, and the window for early intervention narrows.
What women are actually asking for
Younger women in particular are entering maternity care with different expectations. They want explanations for recommendations, not just instructions.
They want to understand tradeoffs and have their preferences carry forward from one visit to the next. They’re not looking to reduce medical oversight, they’re looking for care that makes sense as a whole.
That’s driving real interest in collaborative care models that bring OBs, midwives, nurses, and behavioural health professionals into a coordinated framework.
When roles are clear and communication is shared rather than siloed, the experience changes, and so do outcomes.
Experience is clinical performance
Health systems are sophisticated at tracking infection rates and readmissions. The experience of care deserves the same level of attention, because it’s often where the clinical picture first starts to slip.
The fixes aren’t mysterious. A longer first visit can prevent confusion that compounds over months. Integrated mental health support surfaces concerns that might otherwise go unspoken.
Clear communication across the care team eliminates the mixed messages that erode confidence.
Postpartum services like pelvic floor therapy and lactation support – when easy to access and clearly explained – extend the impact of care well beyond delivery.
Workforce shortages and financial pressure make all of this harder. They also make it more urgent.
When women feel respected and informed, they raise concerns earlier, follow care plans more consistently, and seek help sooner.
That’s not a soft outcome – that’s how complications get prevented.
Simply put: adjusting how care is delivered is one of the most direct ways to improve clinical outcomes.
Entrepreneur2 weeks agoFuture Fertility raises Series A financing to scale AI tools redefining fertility care worldwide
Fertility3 weeks agoFuture Fertility partners with Japan’s leading IVF provider, Kato Ladies Clinic
Menopause3 weeks agoMore research needed to understand link between brain fog and menopause, expert says
Entrepreneur6 days agoWomen’s digital health market set to reach US$5.28 billion in 2026 – report
Mental health2 weeks agoLifting weights shows mental health and cognitive benefits in older women, study finds
Insight3 weeks agoSelf-employment linked to better cardiovascular health outcomes in Hispanic women
Entrepreneur3 weeks agoFlora Fertility closes US$5m seed round
Menopause2 weeks agoResistance training has preventative effects in menopause, study finds















