Connect with us

pain conditions

Government accused of delaying pelvic mesh reforms

Published

on

A woman has accused the government of “dragging its feet” over reforms for women harmed by pelvic mesh implants, five years after a landmark report.

Campaigners say most of the key recommendations from the 2020 First Do No Harm review have been ignored, leaving thousands without compensation or adequate support.

Only three of nine key proposals have been fully implemented since the report revealed how women’s concerns were overlooked, resulting in lasting harm, according to Kath Sansom, founder of the campaign group Sling The Mesh.

Led by Baroness Cumberlege, the review examined the impact of pelvic mesh implants and two drugs – Primodos and sodium valproate. The team spoke to more than 700 women and their families who had experienced complications.

Pelvic mesh is a net-like implant used to support weakened or damaged tissue, often to treat bladder leakage after childbirth. In some cases, the mesh eroded or hardened, cutting through tissue and leaving women in chronic pain, unable to walk, work or have sex.

Primodos, a hormone-based pregnancy test used in the 1970s, is thought to be linked to birth defects and miscarriages. Sodium valproate, an epilepsy medication, was found to cause major birth defects, but many pregnant women were not properly warned of the risks.

Ms Sansom said only three of the report’s recommendations had been fully implemented: a formal government apology, specialist mesh complication centres, and the appointment of a patient safety commissioner for England.

A fourth – the creation of a database to track patients who have received medical devices – remains in progress.

Ms Sansom, from March in Cambridgeshire, said she became an “accidental advocate” after undergoing a pelvic mesh procedure to treat bladder leaks caused by childbirth, which left her in “terrible pain”.

She said: “The institutional inertia amplifies the suffering – especially the lack of compensation for the harm caused to thousands of women who innocently trusted their doctor that they were being given a safe treatment.

“Five years ago, Baroness Cumberlege laid bare the systemic failures that caused irreparable harm yet here we are in 2025, and the government has dragged its feet on the most critical reforms.

“Women are still being failed by a healthcare system that was supposed to protect them.”

She also criticised the decision to move the patient safety commissioner role from the Department of Health and Social Care to the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency, saying it “silences the patient voice instead of strengthening it”.

Sharon Hodgson, Labour MP and chair of the all-party parliamentary group First Do No Harm – Mesh, Primodos, Valproate, said the lack of progress was “hugely disappointing”.

“Five years ago today, things felt hopeful,” she said.

“The review marked what we thought would be the beginning of real systematic change, the start of building a system that listens to women when they report harm – an end to defensiveness and denial.”

She added that thousands of women and families “irreversibly harmed through no fault of their own” had yet to receive compensation.

A spokesperson for the Department of Health and Social Care said: “The harm caused by pelvic mesh continues to be felt today.

“Our sympathies are with those affected and we are fully focused on how best to support patients and prevent future harm.

“The Department of Health and Social Care is considering the recommendations in the report and will provide a further update.

“Health minister Baroness Gillian Merron met patients affected and has committed to providing a further update.”

The spokesperson added: “This is a complex area of work and the government is carefully considering the patient safety commissioner’s recommendations in full.”

Hormonal health

Major UK study could be a ‘game-changer’ for heavy periods and endometriosis

Published

on

A UK study will build a menstrual fluid biobank to help women get faster, better treatment for heavy periods.

Thousands of participants will provide menstrual fluid samples over three cycles using specially designed period pads. They will also use a daily tracking app and complete detailed questionnaires.

Researchers from the Universities of Exeter and Bristol will work with participants from two UK birth cohort studies, Children of the 90s and Born in Bradford.

Professor Gemma Sharp, of the University of Exeter, said that the study is set to be a ‘real game-changer’ for menstrual health research.

Sharp said: “We know that menstrual health is a key indicator of overall health, but a lack of high-quality data means it remains poorly understood and under-supported in healthcare.

“We also know that heavy periods can affect many aspects of daily life – for example, our recent research revealed an association between heavy periods, school attendance and lower GCSE attainment – so we urgently need new ways to support the millions of women affected by heavy periods more promptly and effectively.”

The CycleTrack study aims to create the world’s largest menstrual fluid biobank for people in their mid-30s.

By combining these samples with long-term health and genetic data, researchers hope to identify biological signals linked to differences in periods and related conditions.

Researchers hope the findings could support earlier diagnosis, better care plans and tools to identify risks including iron deficiency.

The study is part of The Missed Vital Sign, a programme led by Wellcome Leap that contributes to a broader global effort to reduce the time it takes a woman to receive effective treatment for heavy menstrual bleeding from five years to five months.

Up to 50 per cent of women worldwide experience heavy periods, which can significantly affect physical, emotional and social wellbeing.

Researchers say the work could also improve understanding of menstrual health more broadly and help inform future school and workplace guidance.

Continue Reading

Cancer

Federal gov should fund drug to treat breast cancer and endometriosis, Aus committee says

Published

on

Australia’s drug advisory committee has recommended wider funding of triptorelin for women with breast cancer or endometriosis.

The recommendation comes after AstraZeneca announced plans to remove Zoladex from the market, risking leaving more than 7,500 women with breast cancer without an alternative treatment.

Both medicines block the release of oestrogen and testosterone and can be used as part of treatment, or for fertility preservation, in some forms of cancer.

The Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee met urgently in July and recommended making triptorelin unrestricted under the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS), which would mean it was funded for all uses.

The drug has been listed on the PBS for prostate cancer since 2006.

Triptorelin and Zoladex can also be used to treat endometriosis and to block puberty for either precocious puberty or gender-affirming care.

Vicki Durston, director of policy and advocacy at Breast Cancer Network Australia, described the recommendation as “a significant step forward” and said access to the medicine could mean the difference between life and death for some patients.

She said some women had already chosen to have their ovaries removed because of uncertainty over Zoladex supplies.

Marilla Druitt, Victorian state chair of the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, said it remained unclear whether triptorelin would work exactly the same way as Zoladex, but the recommendation was likely to be positive for patients with endometriosis and pelvic pain.

She said: “I’m glad we’ve got an alternative.”

“That’s fantastic, and it remains to be seen whether or not it will be as good, but pain is so complex, pain is a really hard thing to study because it’s got so many contributors.”

Druitt said further research would be needed after the medicine was introduced.

If accepted by the federal government, the recommendation would also allow PBS funding of triptorelin for puberty suppression in precocious puberty and gender-affirming care.

This would make gender-affirming care federally funded through the PBS for the first time and would remove a financial barrier for transgender children in Queensland and the Northern Territory.

Stuart Aitken, medical director of Gender Health Australia, said the recommendation had sparked “absolute joy” among his patients.

He said: “It takes away a huge barrier to accessing evidence-based care.”

“It means that the ban has a very limited effect.”

Continue Reading

Hormonal health

Endometriosis linked to higher use of mental health meds, study finds

Published

on

Women later diagnosed with endometriosis used more antidepressant and anxiety medication than other women, with the pattern emerging years before diagnosis, recent study found.

The difference was evident up to 10 years before diagnosis and continued for a decade afterwards, according to a large Danish registry-based study involving 136,842 women.

Women with the condition also had substantially more contact with psychiatric hospital departments than those without it.

Researchers at Aarhus University found that women with endometriosis redeemed 29 per cent more prescriptions for antidepressants and 16 per cent more for anxiety medication in the years before diagnosis.

After diagnosis, the differences rose to 40 per cent for antidepressants and 46 per cent for anxiety medication.

Marie Josiasen, PhD student at the department of public health and one of the researchers behind the study, said: “What surprised us was how clear and persistent the pattern was, and that the difference did not diminish over time.

“On the contrary.

“Women with endometriosis consistently redeemed more prescriptions for antidepressant medication than women without the disease throughout the entire period, from ten years before to ten years after diagnosis.”

The study does not provide an answer as to what causes the mental strain.

Josiasen said prolonged pain, uncertainty about the cause of symptoms and fertility problems could be among the factors contributing to psychological strain.

She said: “It’s possible that prolonged pain, uncertainty about the cause of the symptoms, and frustration over not being able to live the life one wants may be among the reasons. For some women, fertility problems can also be a major psychological burden.”

Researchers also found that the gap compared with women without endometriosis did not narrow after diagnosis. Instead, it became more pronounced in the years that followed.

Josiasen said: “A diagnosis can be a relief, but it also involves coming to terms with having a chronic illness.”

The study does not indicate whether diagnosing endometriosis earlier could reduce psychological strain.

As part of her PhD project, Josiasen will investigate the role hormonal contraception may play in the mental health of women with endometriosis.

She said: “We can see that many receive medication and are in contact with psychiatric services. But we still lack an understanding of what actually helps these women.

“That’s what I want to help find out.”

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025 Aspect Health Media Ltd. All Rights Reserved.