Diagnosis
Most women prefer clinic cervical screening

Most women still prefer clinic cervical screening over at-home self-sampling, despite home testing devices becoming available, a study has found.
However, women who reported discrimination in healthcare, those on lower incomes and those who distrust the healthcare system were more likely to prefer at-home sampling or be unsure which option to choose.
The US Food and Drug Administration approved the first at-home self-sampling device for cervical cancer screening in May 2025. The US Preventive Services Task Force has not recommended at-home screening.
The study analysed data from a nationally representative survey of US adults, including 2,300 women aged 21 to 65, who were asked whether they preferred at-home vaginal self-sampling (collecting their own sample) or clinic-based testing.
The mean age was 45.5 years, more than 90 per cent had health insurance and more than three-quarters said they had at least two healthcare visits in the last year outside emergency care.
Overall, 60.8 per cent of respondents preferred clinic-based testing, while 20.4 per cent favoured at-home self-sampling and 18.8 per cent were unsure.
Some groups were more likely to prefer at-home sampling. Women who had experienced prejudice or discrimination during medical care were about twice as likely to choose at-home sampling as those who had not.
However, non-Hispanic Black women were less likely than non-Hispanic White women to prefer at-home sampling.
Women who were not heterosexual or did not know their sexual orientation, women with an annual income below US$50,000, and those reporting little or no trust in the healthcare system were more likely to be unsure which option to choose.
Among women who preferred at-home self-sampling, and those who were unsure, the most common reason for considering it was privacy.
That was followed by not wanting to take time off work, avoiding embarrassment and saving on transport costs.
Age, income, education level, marital status, location, insurance coverage and sexual orientation were not linked to preferring at-home sampling over clinic-based screening.
The researchers called for at-home self-sampling to be added to US guidelines and backed by the medical community to increase screening rates and reduce cervical cancer inequalities.
They said tailored interventions and information campaigns are needed, “particularly focusing on high-risk groups such as non-Hispanic Black individuals and women who experience prejudice or discrimination when seeking medical care.”
Entrepreneur
TidalSense raises £14m to expand five-minute COPD test across NHS

Cambridge health tech company TidalSense has secured £14.2m in funding led by Cross-Border Impact Ventures to expand its AI-powered lung disease test across the NHS and into Europe and the US.
The investment, which also includes returning backers BGF, Airstream Capital and Foresight Group, will fund the rollout of a handheld diagnostic device that can detect chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in as little as five minutes.
It will also support the development of software to diagnose asthma using the same platform.
Donna Parr is managing partner at Cross-Border Impact Ventures.
She said: We look for technology that doesn’t just have a compelling story, but a body of clinical evidence behind it.
“TidalSense has both, with a CEO who has lived the problem she’s solving, and a product that’s already live within the NHS healthcare environment, saving time for patients who have waited years for an answer.
“It is also technology that can improve access to appropriate treatment for COPD sufferers on a global basis and especially for women who are often misdiagnosed.
“This is exactly the kind of impact we want to make with our investments.”
COPD, a progressive condition that restricts airflow and makes breathing increasingly difficult, is the third leading cause of death in England, according to the NHS.
It is responsible for about 30,000 deaths each year and costs the health service an estimated £1.9bn annually.
The company believes its technology could transform how respiratory disease is diagnosed by replacing the need for conventional spirometry in many settings.
Patients simply breathe normally into the handheld device for 75 seconds while artificial intelligence analyses the breath in real time.
A diagnosis is then displayed on screen, allowing clinicians to complete the entire process in around five minutes.
TidalSense says the technology allows clinicians to assess as many as six patients an hour, compared with roughly one an hour using spirometry, which has remained the standard diagnostic test for COPD despite changing little since it was first developed in the 19th century.
Spirometry requires patients to perform forceful breathing manoeuvres and typically needs specialist staff to administer.
TidalSense chief executive Ameera Patel said: “Our ambition is really bold and broad, and it is to have a really significant impact at a population level on chronic respiratory diseases like COPD and asthma.
“We want the test to be available to anyone the first time they present with symptoms, so there’s no bias in accessibility based on where you live, your socio-economic status or your ethnicity.”
Founded in 2013 by chief engineering officer Julian Carter, who holds a PhD in microelectronics and has more than 35 years’ experience developing medical devices, TidalSense has spent more than a decade building the technology.
Its AI models have been trained on more than 2.5 million recorded breaths to identify the distinctive patterns associated with COPD.
The device was introduced into the NHS last year and is now being used by public health providers in Suffolk, north-east Essex, Wales, Glasgow and community lung screening clinics across the south of England.
Diagnosis
CEM shows promise for screening high-risk breast cancer patients

Contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) has shown promise for women at higher risk of breast cancer, with follow-up screening showing greater specificity and accuracy.
Cancer detection rates remained consistent during repeat screening, while specificity improved compared with baseline examinations.
Specificity shows how accurately a test identifies people who do not have the disease, helping to reduce unnecessary follow-up procedures.
Researchers at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center analysed 6,911 contrast-enhanced mammography screens carried out among 2,756 women between 2015 and 2021.
Contrast-enhanced mammography, or CEM, combines standard mammography with an injected contrast agent that highlights areas of increased blood flow. Cancerous tumours often develop a greater blood supply.
The team compared 1,575 baseline screens with 3,336 incidence screens.
The researchers classified a screen as baseline if the woman had no previous CEM or had not undergone breast MRI in the previous three years.
Incidence screens were follow-up examinations carried out after previous screening.
After adjusting for the number of screens each woman received, the researchers found no statistically significant difference in cancer detection rates between the groups.
However, specificity reached 91.5 per cent during incidence screening, compared with 83.4 per cent for baseline screening.
Overall accuracy was also higher for incidence screening, at 91.4 per cent compared with 83.5 per cent.
“The ability of contrast-enhanced mammography to help detect cancer during prevalence screening in women at increased risk for breast cancer is maintained in subsequent incidence screens, with better specificity and accuracy,” the research team wrote.
Baseline screening detected 19 cancers per 1,000 examinations, compared with 11.6 per 1,000 incidence screens.
Sensitivity, which measures how well a test identifies people who have a disease, was 87.1 per cent for baseline screening and 86.1 per cent for incidence screening.
Contrast enhancement alone helped detect 18 of the 30 cancers found during baseline screening and 36 of the 62 found during incidence screening.
The researchers also identified 14 interval cancers across the examinations, with no evidence of a difference between the two groups.
An interval cancer is diagnosed after a screening result appears normal but before the next scheduled examination.
The retrospective study used previously collected clinical records rather than following participants in a newly designed trial.
The researchers described CEM as a reasonable screening tool for women with dense breasts.
Dense breasts contain more fibrous and glandular tissue, which can make cancer more difficult to detect with standard mammography.
CEM has previously shown greater sensitivity than ultrasound, digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis, according to the article.
Digital breast tomosynthesis takes several low-dose X-ray images from different angles to create a three-dimensional view of breast tissue.
The technique also takes less time and generally costs less than breast MRI, with previous research suggesting its performance is not inferior to MRI.
CEM is currently used for some screening purposes outside its approved indications.
The researchers said it could also help address health inequalities affecting women who face barriers to accessing MRI.
“In addition, women have reported a preference for CEM over MRI,” they wrote.
The researchers said a future article would provide full details about the interval cancers identified in the study.
An accompanying editorial said the technique could become a practical part of breast cancer screening for selected groups, although challenges remain around wider adoption.
“Whether this potential ultimately translates into widespread implementation will depend on future studies evaluating not only diagnostic performance, but also patient outcomes, health care utilisation, and real-world feasibility across diverse practice settings,” wrote Dr Vivianne Aguilera Freitas of the University of Toronto.
Insight
Experimental treatment significantly slows progression of fatal brain disease in women, study finds

Davunetide may significantly slow the progression of a fatal brain disease in women, according to a new analysis of clinical trial data.
The findings indicate that women and men with progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP) may respond differently to the experimental treatment.
Progressive supranuclear palsy, or PSP, is a rare and fatal neurodegenerative disease.
Researchers at Tel Aviv University led the analysis and said the results reinforce the need for sex-specific approaches to neurodegenerative diseases.
Neurodegenerative diseases are conditions in which nerve cells in the brain or nervous system gradually lose function and die.
The team reanalysed data from a 52-week international clinical trial involving more than 300 people with PSP.
The disease is caused by the abnormal accumulation of tau protein in the brain. Tau is a protein found in nerve cells that builds up abnormally in people with PSP.
There is currently no effective drug treatment for the disease.
The work was led by professor Illana Gozes of the Sagol School of Neuroscience and the Gray Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences at Tel Aviv University.
The research team included current and former students Dr Guy Shapira, Jason Blatt and Liri Guz, together with professor Noam Shomron.
The original clinical trial found that Davunetide was safe but ineffective.
However, the researchers separated female and male participants and re-examined the data using updated assessment measures recommended by the FDA.
Women treated with Davunetide experienced a significant slowing of disease progression, while no similar effect was observed in men.
The treatment helped preserve essential movement and functional abilities, including balance, fine motor skills and everyday tasks such as using cutlery, buttoning clothes and washing the face and hands.
Fine motor skills are the small, precise movements needed for tasks involving the fingers and hands.
Treated women also showed significant improvements in language ability, working memory and overall cognitive function.
Cognitive function covers mental abilities such as memory, attention, language and problem-solving.
The analysis also identified profound molecular differences between women and men.
The relationship between levels of pathological tau in cerebrospinal fluid and clinical symptoms was completely reversed between the sexes.
Cerebrospinal fluid is the clear liquid surrounding the brain and spinal cord. A biomarker is a measurable sign that can indicate disease activity.
For example, language abilities declined significantly as tau pathology increased in women, but not in men.
The researchers said this suggests the disease mechanisms may work differently in women and men, potentially explaining their different responses to treatment.
According to professor Gozes, overlooking biological differences between the sexes may hide a genuine treatment effect.
“Our data show that analysing women and men separately is not merely a statistical exercise, but an essential tool for developing more effective treatments for neurodegenerative brain diseases,” she said.
The researchers believe the findings provide a strong scientific basis for future clinical trials and treatment protocols designed from the outset to account for patients’ sex.
These trials could evaluate Davunetide as a targeted treatment for women with PSP.
They said the approach may also pave the way for more precise treatments for tau-related diseases, including Alzheimer’s disease and other neurodegenerative brain disorders.
The study was supported by ExoNavis Therapeutics, which is developing Davunetide for brain diseases under licence from Ramot, Tel Aviv University’s technology transfer company.
Entrepreneur2 weeks agoFertility startup American Baby Company secures US$4m
Insight2 weeks agoNatural Cycles receives sixth FDA clearance for fertility algorithm
Wellness6 days agoCancer patient receives ‘landmark’ treatment in world-first
News2 days agoUK femtech investment surges 194% in a decade, research finds
Insight2 weeks agoExperimental treatment significantly slows progression of fatal brain disease in women, study finds
Sponsored Content2 weeks agoThe room is filling up at WHW Europe 2026 with super early bird pricing ending this Friday
Insight1 week agoJohnson & Johnson offers to pay US$5.5bn to settle talc cancer lawsuits
News2 weeks agoPlanetary Health Diet lowers heart risk in older women, study finds












