Cancer
Precision oncology is here — So why are so many breast cancer treatments still a gamble?

By OncoGenomX, Allschwil, Switzerland
When it comes to breast cancer treatment, one truth remains painfully clear: despite decades of progress we still cannot answer the question which treatment(s) a tumour will respond to.
At OncoGenomX, we think it’s time to change that.
We now have tools that allow us to look inside a tumour, understand how it behaves, and predict what treatments will work best—not just for a cancer subtype, but for an individual tumour, with its unique biology.
It’s called Precision Oncology, and it’s one of the most promising frontiers in cancer care. But right now, its full potential is still out of reach for too many patients.
So why the gap?
The Promise: Personalised Treatment That Works the First Time
The dream of precision medicine is simple: treat the person, not just the disease.
In breast cancer, doctors already use some personalised tools. For example, hormone receptor tests help decide whether a patient should receive endocrine therapy.
Genetic tests like Oncotype DXTM or MammaprintTM can help determine whether chemotherapy is needed. These are great first steps.
But here’s the problem: these tools don’t go far enough. They often tell us what could work, but not what will work. Many patients are still treated based on probabilities and population averages, not precise predictions tailored to their specific tumour.
The result? Too many women receive therapies that don’t work—or stop working quickly. Some get treatments that are too aggressive. Others don’t get enough.
The Reality: Cancer Is Chaotic
Part of the reason breast cancer is so difficult to treat is that no two tumours are alike. Even within a single tumour, cells can behave very differently.
Scientists call this “coordinated chaos.” It means that a treatment might hit some parts of a tumour—but miss others entirely. It also means that two women with the “same” diagnosis may need completely different treatments.
In one major study, only about 1 in 5 patients with advanced cancer actually received all the treatments they were genetically eligible for. Even more worrying: in half of the cases, at least one drug in the treatment plan was likely ineffective.
This isn’t just a medical issue—it’s an economic one. Unmatched or suboptimal therapies drive up costs, delay results, and cause unnecessary side effects.
Precision isn’t just better for patients—it’s better for health systems too.
The Breakthrough: Predicting Treatment Response
At OncoGenomX, we believe the missing link is prediction.
We need tools that can do more than classify tumours or identify potential drug targets. We need models that predict how a specific tumour will respond to tailor-made treatment combination.
That’s why we created PredictionStar™, a clinical decision-support tool designed to help oncologists choose optimal treatment combinations, earlier.
It works by analysing real patient data, tumour biology, and how different therapies interact—so doctors can plan treatment combinations based on what’s most likely to work in concert.
In hypothesis generation studies, we’ve seen a 15–22 per cent improvement in treatment success rates—especially beyond first-line therapy. And when treatments work better, patients do better: survival improves, side effects decrease, and costs drop.
The Future: Smarter, More Human-Centered Oncology
We’re not claiming to cure cancer. But we do believe that better decisions lead to better outcomes.
Our goal is to help oncologists move away from treatment decisions based on probabilities and population averages towards truly rational and individualised treatment planning. That means:
Understanding which therapies are likely to work before trying them
Combining treatments in ways that maximise long-term benefit
Matching each patient to the right combination—any treatment line
This is especially important for women’s health.
Breast cancer is the most common cancer among women worldwide. Yet many women still receive treatments that don’t reflect the full complexity of their disease—or the sophistication of today’s science.
Why It Matters for FemTech
At its core, precision oncology is a FemTech issue. It’s about using technology, data, and science to improve women’s lives.
Breast cancer doesn’t affect all women equally. Outcomes vary by age, race, income, and geography.
That’s why we must ensure that the tools of precision oncology are accessible, equitable, and informed by real-world data from all patients—not just clinical trial populations.
By combining human data, artificial intelligence, and biology, we can move toward a future where every woman receives the best possible care, from the very first treatment.
A Question Worth Asking
If there were a tool with the potential to help doctors select the right treatment combination for a patient’s tumour—based on predictive information—wouldn’t we want them to use it?
At OncoGenomX, we think the answer is clear.
The future of breast cancer care is personal. Let’s make it predictable, too.
Find out more about OncoGenomX at oncogenomx.ch
Diagnosis
Vaccine could prevent some people from developing ovarian cancer

A vaccine trial will test whether an mRNA jab can help stop precancerous cells developing into bowel and ovarian cancer in people with Lynch syndrome.
The first stage is due to launch this summer and will assess whether the jab can train the immune system to recognise and eliminate precancerous cells before cancer develops.
Around 175,000 people in England have Lynch syndrome, but only five per cent, or around 10,000 people, know they have it.
The inherited condition increases the risk of developing bowel cancer by 80 per cent and is linked to around 1,100 bowel cancer cases each year.
Lynch syndrome is also linked to a far higher risk of bowel, womb and ovarian cancer, alongside other types including stomach, pancreatic, kidney and skin cancer.
While the syndrome does not directly cause cancer, the genetic changes can lead to more abnormal cells developing, which then multiply and increase the risk of cancers such as bowel, prostate and endometrial cancer.
It is caused by an alteration in a mismatch repair gene. Carriers do not have any symptoms.
The new Intercept-Lynch trial is part of a scientific collaboration between the University of Oxford and Moderna, while Cancer Research UK has backed the vaccine’s development.
Once patients receive the new mRNA-4194 jab, experts will analyse their immune responses, assess the best dose and check whether the jab is safe.
The second phase of the study will include multiple centres across the UK, including Oxford, and is expected to begin in 2027.
The aim of the trial is to train the immune system with a vaccine to recognise abnormalities and stop them developing into cancer.
Professor David Church, Cancer Research UK senior cancer research fellow in the University of Oxford’s centre for human genetics and lead investigator of the trial, said: “People with Lynch syndrome are at risk of cancers over their entire lives.
“So, it’s very common, for instance, a woman to have a first cancer of her womb, and then some years later have a bowel cancer, or vice versa.
“The targets we’ve chosen for the vaccine were chosen based on their sharedness across multiple cancer types in Lynch syndrome, so we think they should provide broad protection, if the vaccine works.”
In people with Lynch syndrome, mutations can build up, making the cells containing them more likely to turn into cancerous cells.
However, those mutations can be made visible to the immune system and, with enough stimulation, the immune system can attack the abnormal cells and stop cancer from forming.
Professor Church said the mRNA jab acts as “an instruction manual” for the body to attack precancerous cells.
He added that, as with many vaccines, patients may need a booster jab at some stage.
On whether similar approaches could help prevent cancers not caused by Lynch syndrome, Professor Church said: “In terms of proof of principle that we can train the immune system to recognise these cancer-associated alterations and enhance the immune response against them to prevent these pre-cancers or prevent the progression of pre-cancer to cancer, that proof of principle should give us insights that are generalisable.”
David Berman, chief development officer at Moderna, said: “By applying mRNA technology earlier in the patient journey, we aim to harness the immune system when it can have the greatest impact.
“We are proud to bring this innovation to the UK, building on our long-standing collaboration with leading UK institutions to advance mRNA research and development.”
Cancer
Lymph nodes could reveal who’s most at risk of breast cancer spreading

Changes in lymph nodes may help show which breast cancer patients face higher or lower risk of the disease spreading, researchers have found.
The findings could support more tailored care, new treatments and help more people avoid unnecessary treatment.
Dr Simon Vincent is chief scientific officer at Breast Cancer Now, which funded the research:
He said: “These findings suggest that changes to the structure of the lymph nodes are more than just a consequence of the cancer. They can also play an active role in helping breast cancer progress.
“With one person tragically dying from breast cancer every 45 minutes in the UK, we urgently need research like this so that we can better understand who is most at risk of their cancer progressing and becoming incurable. Only then we can find ways to stop it.
“With a better understanding of how lymph nodes change as breast cancer spreads, we could find new targets for future treatments for types of breast cancer that are harder to treat.”
Lymph nodes, a key part of the immune system, help the body fight infections and cancer. In breast cancer, the lymph nodes in the armpit are often the first place the disease spreads to.
At the moment, everyone with invasive breast cancer has to undergo surgery to remove lymph nodes so doctors can check for cancer cells.
Invasive breast cancer means cancer that has spread beyond where it first developed in the breast into nearby tissue.
While this is effective, it can lead to long-term side effects such as swelling of the arm, known as lymphoedema, and may be unnecessary for some patients, particularly those with early-stage disease or those whose cancer responds well to treatment.
The study analysed 331 lymph node samples from people with different types of breast cancer and compared them with healthy lymph nodes from people free from the disease.
It found that breast cancer could change the structure of a network that supports the lymph nodes.
Crucially, some of these changes could occur before doctors were able to spot any cancer cells in the network.
Some changes were linked to a better chance of survival, while others were associated with a poorer prognosis.
Dr Amy Llewellyn and Dr Kalnisha Naidoo from King’s College London, together with professor Sophie Acton at University College London, compared the 331 samples with healthy lymph nodes in people free from the disease.
They looked at fibroblastic reticular cells, known as FRCs, a group of cells in lymph nodes that provide their structure, control fluid flow and activate different immune cells.
The study showed that the structure of this FRC network could change before the cancer had spread and differed depending on the type of breast cancer, any spread and whether someone had received chemotherapy.
Chemotherapy uses medicines to kill cancer cells or slow their growth.
The researchers said the findings could help doctors better understand who is most at risk of breast cancer spreading.
Dr Llewellyn said the first large-scale analysis of FRC in human lymph node tissue from breast cancer patients was addressing the “urgent need” for a better understanding of the area’s biology.
Cancer
Life-prolonging ovarian cancer drug approved for use in England
Menopause4 weeks agoPerimenopause misinformation ‘putting women at risk’
Entrepreneur3 weeks agoWomen’s Health Innovation Summit opens submissions for 2026 Innovation Showcase
Insight2 weeks agoBritish women among angriest in Europe, health survey reveals
News3 weeks agoWomen still being failed when they reach menopause, experts say
Menopause3 weeks agoSweden eyes domestic production of oestrogen patches amid menopause treatment shortage
News3 weeks agoThree menopause innovators shortlisted for Femtech World Award
News1 week agoFemtech World Awards 2026: Winners revealed
Menopause2 weeks agoApple Health adds menopause and perimenopause tracking














4 Comments