News
Genital menopause symptoms: What to expect and when to see a doctor

Article produced in association with Spital Clinic
Genitourinary syndrome of menopause (GSM) affects around one in two women after the menopause — and fewer than one in three of those affected ever bring it up with a doctor.
The condition covers a cluster of vaginal, urinary, and sexual symptoms caused by falling oestrogen levels during and after the menopause transition.
It is one of the most common and most treatable consequences of that hormonal shift, and yet it remains one of the least likely topics to come up in a clinical consultation.
What Is Genitourinary Syndrome of Menopause?
The term genitourinary syndrome of menopause replaced older descriptions like atrophic vaginitis and vulvovaginal atrophy because those names missed the point — this condition is not confined to the vagina.
It affects the entire lower genitourinary tract: the vulva, vagina, urethra, and bladder neck, all of which depend on oestrogen to maintain their structure and function.
As oestrogen levels fall during the perimenopause and drop further after the menopause, these tissues change in tangible ways.
The vaginal lining thins; mucus production decreases; vaginal pH rises, making bacterial imbalance more likely; and the cushioning fat tissue around the vulva diminishes.
Crucially, these changes are progressive — without treatment, they continue to worsen rather than settling on their own.
NICE guideline NICE guideline NG23: Menopause — identification and management, updated in November 2024, defines genitourinary symptoms as a core part of the menopause syndrome. The guidelines support active treatment across all severity levels — not just when symptoms are severe.
The Full Symptom Picture: Genital, Urinary and Sexual
Genital symptoms are the most widely recognised.
Vaginal dryness is the most common, affecting up to 93 per cent of women with GSM — and described as moderate to severe in 68 per cent of those affected.
Other symptoms include burning, itching, soreness, and unusual or offensive discharge caused by changes in the vaginal environment.
The tissue can become fragile enough to bleed from minor friction, including during a gynaecological examination.
Urinary symptoms arise because the urethra and bladder neck are equally dependent on oestrogen.
These include needing to urinate more often or urgently, waking in the night to urinate, pain or burning when urinating, recurrent urinary tract infections, and stress incontinence — leakage triggered by coughing, sneezing, or exercise.
Many women with recurrent UTIs are treated again and again with antibiotics without the underlying GSM ever being identified or addressed.
Sexual symptoms complete the picture: painful intercourse from reduced lubrication and tissue fragility, spotting or bleeding after sex, and reduced arousal, lubrication, and ability to orgasm.
These changes are physical in origin, not psychological — though if symptoms go unmanaged for long enough, the two often start to reinforce each other.
Prevalence data from North Tees and Hartlepool NHS Foundation Trust shows that vaginal dryness affects around one in four women in the lead-up to the menopause, rising to one in two after it, and approximately seven in ten women in their seventies.
Symptoms can begin during the perimenopause — well before periods have stopped.
Anyone noticing these changes can seek assessment through a GP or NHS sexual health service — or through a private gynaecology specialist.
Why GSM Does Not Improve Without Treatment
Unlike hot flushes and night sweats — which typically ease over two to five years — genitourinary symptoms do not improve over time and return once treatment stops.
They are chronic and progressive: the longer they go untreated, the more entrenched the underlying tissue changes become.
This makes the gap between prevalence and treatment especially significant.
Around 70 per cent of women with GSM symptoms never raise them with a healthcare professional, and only 4 per cent to 35 per cent use any form of treatment — partly from embarrassment, partly because many assume nothing can be done.
A condition with safe, effective, NICE-recommended treatments goes largely unmanaged.
First-Line Self-Care: Moisturisers, Lubricants and OTC Options
Vaginal moisturisers — such as Replens, Regelle, and Sylk gel — differ from vaginal lubricants: they are for regular, ongoing use (typically two to three times per week) to maintain tissue hydration.
They do not treat the underlying hormonal cause, but are effective at reducing dryness and discomfort and are NICE NG23-supported as first-line non-hormonal management.
Vaginal lubricants are for use during sexual activity. Water-based lubricants are compatible with latex condoms and diaphragms; oil-based products are not. Both are available over the counter and are a reasonable first step for mild or early symptoms.
NICE NG23 supports their use alongside vaginal oestrogen, and recommends them as the primary option when hormonal treatment is not suitable.
Vaginal Oestrogen and Prescription Treatments
For symptoms that persist beyond a few weeks of self-care, or that are moderate to severe from the outset, NICE NG23 sets out the evidence-based first-line treatment: offer vaginal oestrogen to anyone with genitourinary symptoms associated with the menopause — including those already using systemic HRT — and review regularly.
Vaginal oestrogen restores oestrogen levels in local tissue without significant absorption into the wider body.
NHS information on vaginal oestrogen confirms it does not carry the same risks as systemic HRT — the dose is low and very little reaches the general circulation, which matters for women who have been advised against systemic treatment. It comes as a tablet, pessary, cream, gel, or ring.
NICE NG23 specifically recommends vaginal oestrogen for women already using systemic HRT as well as those who are not — recognising that between 10 per cent and 25 per cent of women on systemic HRT still experience genitourinary symptoms that systemic treatment alone does not fully address.
Two further prescription options are available for women who cannot use vaginal oestrogen or have not responded to it.
Prasterone — a DHEA vaginal pessary — is recommended by NICE NG23 when vaginal oestrogen or non-hormonal treatments have not worked or are not tolerated.
Ospemifene, an oral tablet, is recommended where locally applied treatments are not practical — for example, due to physical disability.
Choosing between these options involves a clinical review of individual history, any contraindications, and personal preference.
A BMS-accredited private menopause assessment can provide that review alongside a full discussion of treatment options.
On laser therapy: the RCOG Scientific Impact Paper No. 72 concluded that vaginal laser treatment for GSM should not be offered outside of randomised controlled trials, and NICE NG23 takes the same position.
For women with a history of breast cancer, non-hormonal moisturisers and lubricants come first; vaginal oestrogen may be considered if those are ineffective, but only with the involvement of the treating oncologist.
When to See a Doctor
The NHS recommends seeking assessment when genital menopause symptoms have persisted for more than a few weeks despite self-care, when they are affecting daily life or sexual function, or when they involve post-menopausal bleeding, unusual discharge, or recurrent urinary tract infections.
Post-menopausal bleeding always warrants prompt GP review. It should not be assumed to be friction-related or attributable to GSM without a clinical examination — it is a red flag symptom that requires investigation to rule out other causes.
Recurrent UTIs in a postmenopausal woman — particularly without an obvious cause — are worth assessing for an underlying GSM component, rather than treating with repeated antibiotic courses alone.
A GP can initiate first-line treatment; for more complex presentations or where initial management has not helped, a menopause specialist can offer a more thorough evaluation.
The shift from terms like atrophic vaginitis to genitourinary syndrome of menopause reflects something important: these are medical symptoms, not a normal inconvenience to be quietly endured.
Effective treatment exists at every level of severity — from OTC moisturisers through to NICE NG23-recommended prescription options.
Anyone whose symptoms are affecting quality of life can see an NHS GP, or book a private menopause assessment with a BMS-accredited specialist.
The gap is not in what medicine can offer — it is in how reliably those options reach the women who need them.
This article is produced for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. Clinical guidance referenced reflects published NHS and NICE standards as at March 2026. Individual circumstances vary; readers are advised to consult a qualified healthcare professional before acting on any information in this article. This piece was produced in association with Spital Clinic, which provided background clinical information for editorial purposes. Hyperlinks to external sources are included for reference only and do not represent an endorsement of any product, service or organisation.
pain conditions
Federal gov should fund drug to treat breast cancer and endometriosis, Aus committee says

Australia’s drug advisory committee has recommended wider funding of triptorelin for women with breast cancer or endometriosis.
The recommendation comes after AstraZeneca announced plans to remove Zoladex from the market, risking leaving more than 7,500 women with breast cancer without an alternative treatment.
Both medicines block the release of oestrogen and testosterone and can be used as part of treatment, or for fertility preservation, in some forms of cancer.
The Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee met urgently in July and recommended making triptorelin unrestricted under the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS), which would mean it was funded for all uses.
The drug has been listed on the PBS for prostate cancer since 2006.
Triptorelin and Zoladex can also be used to treat endometriosis and to block puberty for either precocious puberty or gender-affirming care.
Vicki Durston, director of policy and advocacy at Breast Cancer Network Australia, described the recommendation as “a significant step forward” and said access to the medicine could mean the difference between life and death for some patients.
She said some women had already chosen to have their ovaries removed because of uncertainty over Zoladex supplies.
Marilla Druitt, Victorian state chair of the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, said it remained unclear whether triptorelin would work exactly the same way as Zoladex, but the recommendation was likely to be positive for patients with endometriosis and pelvic pain.
She said: “I’m glad we’ve got an alternative.”
“That’s fantastic, and it remains to be seen whether or not it will be as good, but pain is so complex, pain is a really hard thing to study because it’s got so many contributors.”
Druitt said further research would be needed after the medicine was introduced.
If accepted by the federal government, the recommendation would also allow PBS funding of triptorelin for puberty suppression in precocious puberty and gender-affirming care.
This would make gender-affirming care federally funded through the PBS for the first time and would remove a financial barrier for transgender children in Queensland and the Northern Territory.
Stuart Aitken, medical director of Gender Health Australia, said the recommendation had sparked “absolute joy” among his patients.
He said: “It takes away a huge barrier to accessing evidence-based care.”
“It means that the ban has a very limited effect.”
Insight
Benchmarking 2027: Shifting priorities in US health infrastructure

By Women’s HealthX
As healthcare organisations navigate tightening compliance mandates, evolving reimbursement frameworks, and shifting health economics, the single most critical asset for leadership is operational visibility into what their industry counterparts are executing right now.
Ahead of the Women’s HealthX marketplace in Boston this December, a cross-functional steering committee of health plans, hospital networks, biopharma innovators, and enterprise employers has launched the definitive 2026 U.S. Health Infrastructure Survey.
The objective of this brief, multi-state index is to bypass abstract market fluff and map out exactly how the country’s elite healthcare stakeholders are practically structuring their 2027 budgets, clinical protocols, and technology procurement guidelines.
Some of the questions we are asking:
- Health Plans & Payers “What is the biggest operational barrier to expanding women’s health coverage?”
- Health Systems & Providers “What is the biggest women’s health priority for health systems over the next 24 months?”
- Pharma & Life Sciences “What is the biggest commercial hurdle facing women’s health innovation?”
- Employers & Benefits Leaders “Which women’s health challenge creates the greatest workforce impact?”
By contributing just 60 seconds of your operational insight to the index, you will ensure your specific sector’s parameters are accurately represented.
In return for your participation, you will secure a priority, pre-ordered copy of the completed 30-page intelligence report when the final data drops this September!
See where your direct peer groups are drawing their line in the sand for the upcoming fiscal year.
Contribute 60 seconds and pre-order your national benchmark report
Women’s HealthX 2026 | From Rhetoric to Results
Encore Boston Harbor | December 3-4 2026
Bypass abstract market rhetoric to evaluate real-world health economics, regulatory compliance mandates, and care delivery systems.
Join the region’s foremost health plan medical directors, hospital COOs, biopharma innovators, and enterprise benefits buyers anchoring our 2026 tracks.
Opinion
Why health AI needs to read between the lines

Sahar Abid is a Science Associate at Ema EQ, where she works on cultural sensitivity and bias in AI.
A woman asks an AI health assistant about postpartum depression.
She mentions that her in-laws are telling her to “push through” and skip medical help, even as her symptoms get harder to manage. She never says where she is from or names her background.
The assistant describes the condition and gives her a hotline number. It sounds correct, but it misses what she needs.
That gap is more common than the industry admits, and it points to a blind spot in how we test health AI for bias.
Most bias testing looks at what people explicitly say.
The typical way to check an AI for bias is to label a prompt with someone’s demographic details and see if the answer changes. That catches some problems but misses a bigger one.
Most people do not lead with their identity. They lead with their situation. The woman above told the assistant everything it needed to help her, just not in the form of a label.
Her real question was not only “what is postpartum depression?” It was “how do I get care when the people around me don’t want me to?
When family members hold sway over health decisions, and in many communities they do, advice that asks someone to overrule their family is not something they can act on.
The AI didn’t say anything factually wrong. It answered a different question than the one she was living.
We call this culturally implicit bias, meaning the AI misses the cultural context a situation implies rather than the context a person spells out.
When systems are trained to notice only the explicit cues, they fall back on a default answer built for the majority. For everyone else, the response can feel generic, off-target, or discouraging enough that they stop looking for help.
In health, that is not small. The people most likely to be missed are often the ones the system already underserves.
What we set out to test.
At Ema, we wanted to know how well AI picks up on cultural context that is implied but never stated. So we built our own way to test for it, across a range of communities and real situations like postpartum depression and fertility, using questions that carried cultural meaning without announcing it.
The patterns were consistent. Models often missed the meaning underneath the question. They dropped the specific details a person did share and smoothed them into something generic.
And even when they pointed toward real care, they tended to offer one option instead of choices that might actually fit a person’s life. Any one of those can be the difference between someone following the advice and walking away from care.
Why this matters for anyone building health AI.
Getting this right is the right thing to do, and it also works better.
When an answer reflects a person’s real context, people trust and act on the recommendations more, so they get the help and support they need.
Testing for it is harder than the shortcut most teams use. Swapping a name or a demographic label in and out is easy. Checking whether a model actually understands the human context around a question takes more care.
The shortcut teaches models to perform cultural competence instead of practicing it. No matter how much or how little someone chooses to share, they deserve an answer that is warm, complete, and usable.
A better question.
The bar for equitable health AI should be “does it serve someone who never told you who they are?” It is the harder test, but it determines whether real people get help.
The work of getting there is far from finished, and it is exactly what we are building toward at Ema.
Sources: Naidoo, V., & Chadha, K. K. (2025), Culturally responsive AI chatbots: from framework to field evidence, Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans. Souligne, N., & Subbian, V. (2026), FairLogue: A toolkit for intersectional fairness analysis in clinical machine learning models.
Entrepreneur2 weeks agoApplications close August 18 for Women’s Health Innovation Summit 2026 Innovation Showcase
Menopause2 weeks agoThird of women unaware of perimenopause mental health impact
Fertility6 days agoChelsea FC Women to launch first-of-its-kind player fertility fund
Entrepreneur2 weeks agoWomen’s Health Week Europe 2026 releases fully populated agenda ahead of October summit
Menopause1 week agoMenopausal hormone therapy may lower dementia risk, study suggests
Hormonal health2 weeks agoWe are wrapping our children in plastic and calling it care
Pregnancy2 weeks agoChemicals in plastics may be linked to high blood pressure during pregnancy
News2 weeks agoWomen with endometriosis face 46% higher risk of type 2 diabetes – study












