News
Opinion: Why women’s health needs transformational, not incremental, change
Hope Khoury, COO of product development firm Go Vertical ICM, urges faster and more prevention-focused improvement of women’s healthcare globally.
Women’s health has languished long enough in medicine, with millions underserved, misunderstood, and having to struggle with a system that too frequently doesn’t comprehend the entirety of female physiology.
Although recent years have brought us an onslaught of new awareness, how much further there is to ascend remains sizable, especially for diseases that are still underfunded, misdiagnosed, or altogether overlooked.
As a person who has struggled firsthand with the impact of uterine fibroids—a struggle that transformed my whole life—I understand intimately how incapacitating these conditions can be.
My personal ordeal started at 28 when I was diagnosed with a life-threatening 18 cm fibroid. It was not only a health emergency; it was an eye-opener to the systemic disregard for women’s reproductive well-being.
My mother had a hysterectomy at age 43, and I assumed that’s where I was going, too. Rather than accept limited options, though, I began making some choices of my own.
A silent epidemic
Uterine fibroids affect as many as 80% of women by the time they reach 50, and still, the condition is under-discussed and under-researched. Symptoms—chronic pain, excessive menstrual bleeding, infertility, and a reduced quality of life—are disabling, and yet treatments are too often limited to invasive surgeries or hormone therapies that introduce their own risks and side effects.
The bigger question is: why are we still dealing with women’s health on a reactive, rather than proactive, basis? Why is there so little emphasis on prevention? This is not a isolated problem to fibroids alone, but for a vast majority of conditions that affect only women, from endometriosis to PCOS, menopausal issues, and female-onset cancers.
The femtech revolution
One ray of hope lies in the rise of femtech. Yet here too, innovation is held back by a shortage of finance, regulatory hurdles, and the widespread problem of gender bias in medical research.
Even though women comprise more than half of the population, less than 1% of healthcare research funding is allocated to female-specific diseases. And although the femtech market is expected to be valued at more than $50 billion by 2025, the sector continues to attract relatively smaller proportions of investment compared to conventional health and wellness startups.
This inequality is especially troubling when we recognize that innovation in women’s health doesn’t just help women—it helps whole societies. When women are healthy, they’re more productive, more involved, and better able to contribute to their families, workplaces, and communities.
Prevention as the future of women’s health
Following my diagnosis and surgery, I leveraged my training in pharmacology to create a botanical-based supplement that would stop fibroids from growing in the first place.
Prevention needs to be a femtech principle, one that reframes the discussion from symptom management to the underlying causes of disease.
Women deserve solutions that harmonise with their bodies, not fight against them. That involves harnessing the strength of science-proven botanicals, augmenting diagnostic capabilities for early detection, and leveraging technology to provide personalised health information.
AI-powered menstrual tracking, hormone testing, and non-invasive procedures shouldn’t be the future; they should be the now. Alongside better technology, women also need access to trusted spaces where their concerns are taken seriously and treated with care. Resources such as dedicated support for women’s wellbeing play a meaningful role in ensuring that women can seek guidance, treatment, and reassurance without judgement.
I do think that by bringing together scientists, clinicians, and entrepreneurs, we can create a future where women do not have to suffer in silence. The change that we need is not incremental; it has to be transformational.
Hope Khoury is COO of Go Vertical ICM, a firm which helps to guide new products from idea to market.
Diagnosis
Lung cancer drug shows breast cancer potential
Ovarian cancer cells quickly activate survival responses after PARP inhibitor treatment, and a lung cancer drug could help block this, research suggests.
PARP inhibitors are a common treatment for ovarian cancer, particularly in tumours with faulty DNA repair. They stop cancer cells fixing DNA damage, which leads to cell death, but many tumours later stop responding.
Researchers identified a way cancer cells may survive PARP inhibitor treatment from the outset, pointing to a potential way to block that response. A Mayo Clinic team found ovarian cancer cells rapidly switch on a pro-survival programme after exposure to PARP inhibitors. A key driver is FRA1, a transcription factor (a protein that turns genes on and off) that helps cancer cells adapt and avoid death.
The team then tested whether brigatinib, a drug approved for certain lung cancers, could block this response and boost the effect of PARP inhibitors. Brigatinib was chosen because it inhibits multiple signalling pathways involved in cancer cell survival.
In laboratory studies, combining brigatinib with a PARP inhibitor was more effective than either treatment alone. Notably, the effect was seen in cancer cells but not normal cells, suggesting a more targeted approach.
Brigatinib also appeared to act in an unexpected way. Rather than working through the usual DNA repair routes, it shut down two signalling molecules, FAK and EPHA2, that aggressive ovarian cancer cells rely on. FAK and EPHA2 are proteins that relay survival signals inside cells. Blocking both at once weakened the cells’ ability to adapt and resist treatment, making them more vulnerable to PARP inhibitors.
Tumours with higher levels of FAK and EPHA2 responded better to the drug combination. Other data link high levels of these molecules to more aggressive disease, pointing to potential benefit in harder-to-treat cases.
Arun Kanakkanthara, an oncology investigator at Mayo Clinic and a senior author of the study, said: “This work shows that drug resistance does not always emerge slowly over time; cancer cells can activate survival programmes very early after treatment begins.”
John Weroha, a medical oncologist at Mayo Clinic and a senior author of the study, said: “From a clinical perspective, resistance remains one of the biggest challenges in treating ovarian cancer. By combining mechanistic insights from Dr Kanakkanthara’s laboratory with my clinical experience, this preclinical work supports the strategy of targeting resistance early, before it has a chance to take hold. This strategy could improve patient outcomes.”
Insight
Higher nighttime temps linked to increased risk of autism diagnosis in children – study
Entrepreneur
Kindbody unveils next-gen fertility platform
-
Insight4 weeks agoDesigner perfumes recalled over banned chemical posing fertility risk
-
Insight2 weeks agoParents sue IVF clinic after delivering someone else’s baby
-
Insight3 weeks agoWomen’s health could unlock US$100bn by 2030
-
Insight4 weeks agoChina’s birth rate hits record low despite government fertility efforts
-
Menopause3 weeks agoHRT linked to greater weight loss on tirzepatide
-
Entrepreneur5 days agoUS startup builds wearable hormone tracker
-
Menopause2 weeks agoFlo Health and Mayo Clinic publish global perimenopause awareness study
-
News4 weeks agoVerdane invest in Clue to accelerate the future of women’s health






