News
Opinion: Why women’s health needs transformational, not incremental, change

Hope Khoury, COO of product development firm Go Vertical ICM, urges faster and more prevention-focused improvement of women’s healthcare globally.
Women’s health has languished long enough in medicine, with millions underserved, misunderstood, and having to struggle with a system that too frequently doesn’t comprehend the entirety of female physiology.
Although recent years have brought us an onslaught of new awareness, how much further there is to ascend remains sizable, especially for diseases that are still underfunded, misdiagnosed, or altogether overlooked.
As a person who has struggled firsthand with the impact of uterine fibroids—a struggle that transformed my whole life—I understand intimately how incapacitating these conditions can be.
My personal ordeal started at 28 when I was diagnosed with a life-threatening 18 cm fibroid. It was not only a health emergency; it was an eye-opener to the systemic disregard for women’s reproductive well-being.
My mother had a hysterectomy at age 43, and I assumed that’s where I was going, too. Rather than accept limited options, though, I began making some choices of my own.
A silent epidemic
Uterine fibroids affect as many as 80% of women by the time they reach 50, and still, the condition is under-discussed and under-researched. Symptoms—chronic pain, excessive menstrual bleeding, infertility, and a reduced quality of life—are disabling, and yet treatments are too often limited to invasive surgeries or hormone therapies that introduce their own risks and side effects.
The bigger question is: why are we still dealing with women’s health on a reactive, rather than proactive, basis? Why is there so little emphasis on prevention? This is not a isolated problem to fibroids alone, but for a vast majority of conditions that affect only women, from endometriosis to PCOS, menopausal issues, and female-onset cancers.
The femtech revolution
One ray of hope lies in the rise of femtech. Yet here too, innovation is held back by a shortage of finance, regulatory hurdles, and the widespread problem of gender bias in medical research.
Even though women comprise more than half of the population, less than 1% of healthcare research funding is allocated to female-specific diseases. And although the femtech market is expected to be valued at more than $50 billion by 2025, the sector continues to attract relatively smaller proportions of investment compared to conventional health and wellness startups.
This inequality is especially troubling when we recognize that innovation in women’s health doesn’t just help women—it helps whole societies. When women are healthy, they’re more productive, more involved, and better able to contribute to their families, workplaces, and communities.
Prevention as the future of women’s health
Following my diagnosis and surgery, I leveraged my training in pharmacology to create a botanical-based supplement that would stop fibroids from growing in the first place.
Prevention needs to be a femtech principle, one that reframes the discussion from symptom management to the underlying causes of disease.
Women deserve solutions that harmonise with their bodies, not fight against them. That involves harnessing the strength of science-proven botanicals, augmenting diagnostic capabilities for early detection, and leveraging technology to provide personalised health information.
AI-powered menstrual tracking, hormone testing, and non-invasive procedures shouldn’t be the future; they should be the now. Alongside better technology, women also need access to trusted spaces where their concerns are taken seriously and treated with care. Resources such as dedicated support for women’s wellbeing play a meaningful role in ensuring that women can seek guidance, treatment, and reassurance without judgement.
I do think that by bringing together scientists, clinicians, and entrepreneurs, we can create a future where women do not have to suffer in silence. The change that we need is not incremental; it has to be transformational.
Hope Khoury is COO of Go Vertical ICM, a firm which helps to guide new products from idea to market.
Diagnosis
Being female not a universal stroke risk factor for patients with AF, study finds

Female sex may not raise stroke risk across all atrial fibrillation (AF) patients, with higher risk mainly seen in women aged 75 and older, a study suggests.
Researchers said stroke prevention for women with the condition should be more personalised, especially for patients under 75.
Dr Amitabh C Pandey, director of cardiovascular translational research at Tulane University School of Medicine, said: “For years, female sex has been included as a risk factor along with other factors such as high blood pressure and diabetes, meaning women were more likely to be prescribed anticoagulants.
“Our study shows younger women may not have as much added stroke risk as previously thought, while older women, particularly those over 75, appear to have a higher risk that deserves close attention.”
The new Tulane University study challenges a long-standing assumption in heart care that being female automatically increases stroke risk for patients with atrial fibrillation.
Atrial fibrillation, often called AF, is a common heart rhythm disorder that causes the heart to beat irregularly.
It is associated with a higher risk of stroke and is often treated with anticoagulants, also known as blood thinners.
The study found that stroke risk did not increase equally across all female patients with AF.
Instead, researchers said being female may act more as a risk modifier, with increased stroke risk seen primarily among women aged 75 and older or those with a greater burden of other health conditions.
Clinicians often use a scoring system to decide whether people with AF should be prescribed blood thinners.
The system gives points for factors including age, heart failure, diabetes, previous stroke, vascular disease and high blood pressure.
Women also receive one point for sex alone.
Researchers said this can mean women with AF become eligible for blood thinners earlier or more often than men with otherwise similar risk profiles.
While blood thinners can help prevent clot-related strokes, they can also increase the risk of bruising, prolonged bleeding, gastrointestinal bleeding and other serious complications.
The researchers analysed approximately 950,000 patients with AF using TriNetX, a large anonymised electronic health record database.
They compared stroke outcomes between male and female patients across three age groups: younger than 65, 65 to 74, and 75 and older.
Male and female patients were matched based on age, other health problems and whether they had been prescribed anticoagulation medicine.
Among patients younger than 75, the study found no significant difference in one-year stroke risk between men and women.
However, among patients aged 75 and older, women had a modest but statistically significant increase in stroke risk compared with men.
In patients aged 75 and older with no additional risk factors beyond age, women had about one additional stroke per 629 patients compared with their male counterparts.
The findings support growing interest in a newer AF risk score, known as CHA2DS2-VA, which removes sex as a standalone risk factor.
However, researchers said more studies are needed and medical guidance remains inconsistent.
Han Feng, assistant professor at Tulane University School of Medicine, said: “This general approach came from women being underrepresented in AFib trials and studies comprising only about one-third of study populations.
“Our study shows not all women with AFib have the same risk profile, and these decisions should be individualised.
Pandey said: “These findings highlight the need for modern tools and approaches that can personalise risk profiles to individuals.
“The goal is not to undertreat patients who need stroke prevention, but to better identify who is most likely to benefit from anticoagulation and who may be exposed to unnecessary risk.”
Diagnosis
AI may help accelerate breast cancer diagnosis for high-risk women – study
Fertility
Infertility may be risk factor for early menopause, study suggests
Menopause1 week agoPerimenopause misinformation ‘putting women at risk’
News4 weeks agoNIH Grant terminations disproportionately impact minority scientists, research finds
Adolescent health4 weeks agoWUKA brings Period-Positive Pool Party to London Aquatics Centre to keep girls swimming through puberty
Insight3 weeks agoPCOS renamed after decade-long campaign to end ‘cyst’ misconception
Hormonal health2 weeks agoNHS urged to update website following renaming of PCOS
Menopause4 weeks agoCBT shows promise for menopause insomnia and hot flashes
Events4 weeks agoWHIS 2026 unveils agenda and first speakers for the leading women’s health summit
News7 days agoThree menopause innovators shortlisted for Femtech World Award















