Motherhood
Blood pressure patterns during pregnancy predict later hypertension risk

Women with blood pressure levels in a range considered clinically normal during pregnancy but no mid-pregnancy drop in blood pressure face an increased risk of developing hypertension in the five years after giving birth, a new study shows.
These women, about 12 per cent of the population studied, would not be flagged as high-risk by current medical guidelines, but the new findings could help identify them as candidates for early intervention.
Researchers collected data on blood pressure and other health factors from 854 women during pregnancy and up to five years postpartum. That longitudinal approach allowed them to map the trajectory of women’s blood pressure throughout pregnancy and to spot a link between specific blood pressure patterns and hypertension several years later.
For most women in the study (80.2 per cent), systolic blood pressure remained low throughout pregnancy. In 7.4 per cent of women, blood pressure started out high, dropped during the second trimester, then increased again.
A third group of women (12.4 per cent) had slightly elevated systolic blood pressure that remained at a healthy level throughout pregnancy, but did not drop during the second trimester. Compared to the first group, these women faced a 4.91 times higher risk of hypertension in the five years after giving birth.
“This group of women would not be identified as having higher long-term hypertension risk by any of the current clinical criteria, since their blood pressure remained below diagnostic thresholds and most did not have other traditional risk factors,” said Shohreh Farzan, associate professor of population and public health sciences at the Keck School of Medicine of USC and the study’s senior author.
The findings suggest that tracking blood pressure patterns during pregnancy could help identify this underrecognised group and plan interventions that may prevent cardiovascular disease, said the study’s first author, Zhongzheng (Jason) Niu, a Presidential Sustainability Solutions Fellow at USC and an assistant professor of epidemiology and environmental health at the University at Buffalo.
Data for the study came from the Maternal and Developmental Risks from Environmental and Social Stressors (MADRES) cohort, a group of 854 low-income Hispanic women and their children who Keck School of Medicine researchers have worked with since 2015.
Researchers collected data on demographics, lifestyle factors and various health indicators periodically during pregnancy and at annual visits up to five years postpartum.
After collecting the data, researchers used a statistical approach known as latent class growth modeling to search for patterns in women’s blood pressure over the course of their pregnancies and to determine whether these patterns were associated with changes in their health at later visits.
They found three distinct patterns of systolic blood pressure during pregnancy: 80.2 per cent of women had consistently low blood pressure; 7.4 per cent of women had high blood pressure that dropped during the second trimester; and 12.4 per cent of women had slightly elevated blood pressure with no mid-pregnancy dip.
The group with high blood pressure and a mid-pregnancy dip had classic high-risk pregnancies, including more cases of preeclampsia and gestational hypertension than the other two groups. They also faced a 5.44 times higher risk of hypertension in the five years after giving birth, compared to the lowest-blood pressure group.
The 12.4 per cent of women with slightly elevated blood pressure but no mid-pregnancy dip faced a nearly equivalent risk of later hypertension — 4.91 times that of the lowest-blood pressure group.
“But because these women lacked traditional risk factors, they would not be alerted to their higher risk, nor would they be closely monitored for the development of high blood pressure,” Farzan said.
“Women’s health can change a lot between pregnancy and menopause, but it’s a period we know very little about,” Niu said.
“Our study helps fill that gap in understanding when it comes to hypertension.”
Simple changes in clinical practice can help identify and treat this high-risk group, Niu said. Clinicians can map blood pressure throughout pregnancy and follow up with women who lack a second-trimester dip, even if their readings stay within the normal range. The AHA, which updated hypertension cutoffs for the general population in 2017, may also consider adjusting its guidelines for blood pressure during pregnancy.
Additional studies are needed to replicate the findings and to learn more about women in both at-risk groups. Farzan, Niu and their colleagues are also exploring whether environmental exposures, including air pollution, heavy metals, and per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS)—are linked to changes in blood pressure patterns during and after pregnancy.
Pregnancy
Women’s health strategy a ‘missed opportunity,’ RCM says
Pregnancy
Scotland to publish dedicated miscarriage patient charter

Scotland is set to publish the UK’s first dedicated miscarriage patient charter, giving women and families clear information on NHS care and support.
Commissioned by the Scottish Government and developed with baby-loss charities Tommy’s, Held In Our Hearts and the Miscarriage Association, the charter sets out minimum standards for compassionate, clinically appropriate and culturally competent miscarriage care across Scotland.
It builds on the Scottish Government’s Delivery Framework for Miscarriage Care, which has already changed practice across NHS boards.
Jenni Minto, Scottish public health and women’s health minister, said: “Miscarriage is devastating, and for too long women have not had the care and support they deserve.
“That is changing. Scotland will become the first country in the UK to publish a miscarriage patient charter, meaning women know exactly how they will be supported by health services following their loss.”
Unlike previous UK-wide norms, where women were typically offered enhanced support only after three miscarriages, Scotland’s approach means women can receive appropriate support after their first miscarriage.
The charter also sets out clear rights and expectations so every woman, regardless of location or circumstance, understands the care she should receive.
It includes access to private rooms in hospitals rather than busy clinical areas or maternity settings, progesterone treatment where clinically appropriate, compassionate and culturally competent bereavement support, and clear information in 18 languages, including British Sign Language and audio formats.
Progesterone is a hormone that growing evidence suggests may help reduce the risk of miscarriage in certain cases when given to women who meet specific clinical criteria.
The Scottish Government said the charter is designed to ensure personalised, respectful care and to address long-standing inequalities experienced by women during miscarriage.
It is intended to provide clarity on the support women can expect, consistent standards across all NHS boards, stronger awareness and confidence among healthcare professionals, and better access to emotional and practical support services.
Charities involved in its development said many women still report feeling dismissed, uninformed or unsupported during miscarriage.
They said the new charter marks an important step towards making sure every woman feels heard, respected and cared for.
The charter aligns with Scotland’s wider Women’s Health Plan, which is improving care across reproductive, menstrual, maternal and perinatal health.
Recent national developments include greater investment in women’s health services, improved training for healthcare staff, new digital and in-person support tools, and targeted action to reduce inequalities in access and outcomes.
Together, these measures aim to create a more compassionate and equitable women’s health system.
Minto said: “This charter is a landmark moment.
“It tells women clearly what they should expect from their NHS, and it holds services to account for delivering it.
“Scotland is leading the way, and I am proud of the progress NHS boards and our charity partners have made together.”
The model is expected to inform wider UK discussions on miscarriage support, bereavement care and early pregnancy services.
The charter will be made publicly available, offering women, partners and families clear guidance on their rights and the standards they can expect when seeking care.
Motherhood
The maternity care crisis hiding in plain sight

By Adrianne Nickerson, founder and CEO, Oula
The numbers get the headlines. Maternal mortality rates. Access deserts. Workforce shortages. These are real and urgent problems, but they’re not the whole story.
There’s a quieter breakdown happening inside routine appointments, and it’s driving outcomes in ways that never show up in formal reports.
Women describe maternity care that feels rushed and transactional.
They talk about repeating their medical history at every visit, leaving appointments with questions they never got to ask, and receiving advice so generic it doesn’t seem to account for their actual lives.
These aren’t just complaints about bedside manner. They’re signals that the system is losing the thread, and when that happens, clinical risk follows.
A patient who doesn’t feel heard may decide a new symptom isn’t worth mentioning.
A patient who leaves an appointment without clear next steps may wait too long to call when something changes. These small moments of disconnection are where complications quietly take shape.
The system is structured to rush
This isn’t about individual clinicians failing women. It’s about a care model built around short, physician-led visits with limited coordination across roles — applied to pregnancies that are often medically and emotionally complex.
Clinicians are covering more ground in less time, and patients feel that compression. Women in marginalised communities feel it most acutely.
Reports of dismissal and bias are well-documented, and the consequences compound: when trust erodes, communication breaks down, and the window for early intervention narrows.
What women are actually asking for
Younger women in particular are entering maternity care with different expectations. They want explanations for recommendations, not just instructions.
They want to understand tradeoffs and have their preferences carry forward from one visit to the next. They’re not looking to reduce medical oversight, they’re looking for care that makes sense as a whole.
That’s driving real interest in collaborative care models that bring OBs, midwives, nurses, and behavioural health professionals into a coordinated framework.
When roles are clear and communication is shared rather than siloed, the experience changes, and so do outcomes.
Experience is clinical performance
Health systems are sophisticated at tracking infection rates and readmissions. The experience of care deserves the same level of attention, because it’s often where the clinical picture first starts to slip.
The fixes aren’t mysterious. A longer first visit can prevent confusion that compounds over months. Integrated mental health support surfaces concerns that might otherwise go unspoken.
Clear communication across the care team eliminates the mixed messages that erode confidence.
Postpartum services like pelvic floor therapy and lactation support – when easy to access and clearly explained – extend the impact of care well beyond delivery.
Workforce shortages and financial pressure make all of this harder. They also make it more urgent.
When women feel respected and informed, they raise concerns earlier, follow care plans more consistently, and seek help sooner.
That’s not a soft outcome – that’s how complications get prevented.
Simply put: adjusting how care is delivered is one of the most direct ways to improve clinical outcomes.
Entrepreneur5 days agoFuture Fertility raises Series A financing to scale AI tools redefining fertility care worldwide
Entrepreneur4 weeks agoThree sessions that show exactly where women’s health is heading in 2026
Pregnancy4 weeks agoHow NIPT has evolved and what AI NIPT means in 2026
News4 weeks agoTwo weeks left to make your mark in women’s cardiovascular health
Opinion4 weeks agoQ1 momentum: Female founders are advancing, but the system still hasn’t caught up
Fertility2 weeks agoFuture Fertility partners with Japan’s leading IVF provider, Kato Ladies Clinic
Mental health1 week agoLifting weights shows mental health and cognitive benefits in older women, study finds
Menopause2 weeks agoMore research needed to understand link between brain fog and menopause, expert says
















1 Comment