News
How can I prove that medical negligence occurred in my case?
When healthcare professionals fail to provide the standard of care patients deserve, the consequences can be devastating. Proving medical negligence, however, needs more than just a poor outcome. It demands a structured approach to evidence gathering and a clear understanding of legal requirements. If you believe you’ve experienced substandard care, here’s what you need to know about building a compelling case.
- 1. Understanding medical negligence
Medical negligence occurs when a healthcare professional delivers care that falls below the accepted standard, resulting in harm to the patient. This type of negligence can manifest in various forms, including misdiagnosis, surgical errors, medication mistakes, or failures in patient aftercare. According to NHS Resolution, in 2022/2023, there have been 13,511 reported incidents across primary and secondary care, which highlights a significant issue in the UK healthcare system. For a case to be legally recognised, it must be established that the care provided deviated from what a reasonable medical professional would have delivered in similar circumstances.
- 2. Gathering evidence
The basis of any successful case is in comprehensive evidence collection. When gathering evidence for medical negligence claims, it’s important to obtain thorough medical records and expert opinions. Documenting every aspect of your experience strengthens your position. Essential evidence usually includes medical records from all relevant providers, a detailed timeline of treatments and consultations, photographs of visible injuries or complications, a personal diary documenting symptoms and their impact, and all correspondence with healthcare providers.
Securing a second medical opinion can really strengthen your position, offering expert insight into how your treatment diverged from expected standards. The Care Quality Commission recommends patients maintain thorough records of all healthcare interactions to protect their interests.
- 3. Establishing breach of duty and causation
For a medical negligence claim to succeed, two critical legal elements must be proven:
- Breach of duty: Showing that the healthcare provider failed to meet the expected standard of care. This needs expert medical testimony establishing what the correct treatment should have been.
- Causation: Proving that this breach directly caused your injury or worsened your condition. This often represents the most challenging aspect of medical negligence claims. As healthcare providers may argue that complications resulted from underlying conditions instead of their actions.
The “but for” test is commonly applied—would the harm have occurred “but for” the negligent treatment? Establishing this clear causal link needs expert medical witnesses who can explain complex medical concepts in terms that clearly show how substandard care led to specific harms.
When you understand these needs and requirements and work with specialists experienced in the complexities of healthcare litigation, you can go through the challenging process of proving medical negligence and secure appropriate compensation for the experience you went through.
Diagnosis
Lung cancer drug shows breast cancer potential
Ovarian cancer cells quickly activate survival responses after PARP inhibitor treatment, and a lung cancer drug could help block this, research suggests.
PARP inhibitors are a common treatment for ovarian cancer, particularly in tumours with faulty DNA repair. They stop cancer cells fixing DNA damage, which leads to cell death, but many tumours later stop responding.
Researchers identified a way cancer cells may survive PARP inhibitor treatment from the outset, pointing to a potential way to block that response. A Mayo Clinic team found ovarian cancer cells rapidly switch on a pro-survival programme after exposure to PARP inhibitors. A key driver is FRA1, a transcription factor (a protein that turns genes on and off) that helps cancer cells adapt and avoid death.
The team then tested whether brigatinib, a drug approved for certain lung cancers, could block this response and boost the effect of PARP inhibitors. Brigatinib was chosen because it inhibits multiple signalling pathways involved in cancer cell survival.
In laboratory studies, combining brigatinib with a PARP inhibitor was more effective than either treatment alone. Notably, the effect was seen in cancer cells but not normal cells, suggesting a more targeted approach.
Brigatinib also appeared to act in an unexpected way. Rather than working through the usual DNA repair routes, it shut down two signalling molecules, FAK and EPHA2, that aggressive ovarian cancer cells rely on. FAK and EPHA2 are proteins that relay survival signals inside cells. Blocking both at once weakened the cells’ ability to adapt and resist treatment, making them more vulnerable to PARP inhibitors.
Tumours with higher levels of FAK and EPHA2 responded better to the drug combination. Other data link high levels of these molecules to more aggressive disease, pointing to potential benefit in harder-to-treat cases.
Arun Kanakkanthara, an oncology investigator at Mayo Clinic and a senior author of the study, said: “This work shows that drug resistance does not always emerge slowly over time; cancer cells can activate survival programmes very early after treatment begins.”
John Weroha, a medical oncologist at Mayo Clinic and a senior author of the study, said: “From a clinical perspective, resistance remains one of the biggest challenges in treating ovarian cancer. By combining mechanistic insights from Dr Kanakkanthara’s laboratory with my clinical experience, this preclinical work supports the strategy of targeting resistance early, before it has a chance to take hold. This strategy could improve patient outcomes.”
Pregnancy
Higher nighttime temps linked to increased risk of autism diagnosis in children – study
Entrepreneur
Kindbody unveils next-gen fertility platform
-
Insight4 weeks agoDesigner perfumes recalled over banned chemical posing fertility risk
-
Insight2 weeks agoParents sue IVF clinic after delivering someone else’s baby
-
Insight3 weeks agoWomen’s health could unlock US$100bn by 2030
-
Insight4 weeks agoChina’s birth rate hits record low despite government fertility efforts
-
Menopause3 weeks agoHRT linked to greater weight loss on tirzepatide
-
Entrepreneur6 days agoUS startup builds wearable hormone tracker
-
Menopause2 weeks agoFlo Health and Mayo Clinic publish global perimenopause awareness study
-
News4 weeks agoVerdane invest in Clue to accelerate the future of women’s health






