News
Patients take legal action to save frozen embryos after admin error

At least 15 fertility patients are taking legal action to prevent their frozen embryos being destroyed after administrative errors left them at risk of losing their chance to have children.
The group includes people with cancer and fertility problems who froze gametes (eggs and sperm) or embryos to improve their chances of conceiving later on, but were told they had not renewed consent in time due to clinic mistakes.
Some only discovered the problem when they approached clinics about plans to start a family — for some, their only hope of conceiving naturally.
Others were contacted by clinics after internal audits revealed the errors and were told they could only extend storage through a court order.
The errors relate to two legal changes: one in 2022 that extended the maximum storage period for embryos and gametes from 10 to 55 years for personal use, provided consent is renewed every 10 years; and a temporary two-year extension introduced during the coronavirus pandemic in 2020.
In several cases, clinics failed to contact patients about renewing consent, recorded incorrect expiry dates or medical details, or did not follow up on reminders.
Some patients missed emails that did not make the urgency clear, while others continued to make annual storage payments, assuming everything was in order.
James Lawford Davies, a partner at LDMH Partners representing the group, said that although the fertility law change had been “positive and well intentioned”, both clinics and patients had found the new rules “difficult to understand and apply.”
He said: “The cases before the court have arisen as a result of errors, oversights and misunderstandings surrounding the new rules.
“The applications are hugely significant for all the patients involved and, for many, this represents their only chance of having their own genetic child.
“We hope that, going forward, the guidance and process for storage consents can be clarified and simplified for patients and clinics alike.”
Appearing in the high court this week, Emma Sutton KC, representing the applicants, said they felt “emotional” and “distressed” as they “would have given their consent had the process been put into effect in the way it should have.”
She added that the patients had been left “in limbo” for nearly a year, with “time of the essence” for some couples because of age or health problems.
She argued that destroying the embryos would conflict with article 8 of the Human Rights Act, which gives people the right to a family life, and said allowing extensions “would not undermine a fundamental objective of the statutory scheme – namely the requirement for consent.”
Barristers representing the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA) and the Department of Health and Social Care supported case-by-case consideration and proposed that, where clinics failed to notify people, patients should be given six months to arrange consent renewal.
Jeremy Hyam KC, for the Department of Health and Social Care, expressed concern that the law’s focus on effective consent could be undermined if there were a “free for all”, leading clinics to adopt a “default position of indefinite storage” out of fear of liability for miscommunication.
He said cases in which patients had been notified but made errors — such as failing to open emails, update addresses or log into online portals — should not automatically be granted extensions.
Ravi Mehta, for the HFEA, expressed the regulator’s “sympathy” for the patients and praised clinics for their “candour” in admitting mistakes.
He noted that under UK fertility law, clinics — not patients — are responsible for securing consent.
“[The patient’s] wishes now are sufficient – no one is asking for open-ended relief, that takes consent now as opening the door to everything.”
Mrs Justice Morgan, who heard the case, will deliver a written judgment in the coming months.
Fertility
Hormone sensor could streamline IVF process
Pregnancy
Pregnancy complications and stress linked to long-term cardiovascular risk

Pregnancy complications may leave women more vulnerable to the long-term heart effects of stress, a recent study suggests.
A study of more than 3,000 women in their first pregnancy found persistently higher stress levels were associated with higher blood pressure after pregnancy, specifically in women who had adverse pregnancy outcomes including preeclampsia, preterm birth, having a baby that was small for gestational age, meaning smaller than expected for that stage of pregnancy, or stillbirth.
Among women who experienced these complications, higher stress levels over time were associated with blood pressure that was 2 mm Hg higher than that of the low-stress group during the years two to seven after delivery.
This was not the case among women who did not experience adverse pregnancy outcomes.
Virginia Nuckols, lead author of the study and a postdoctoral fellow in the University of Delaware’s department of kinesiology and applied physiology, said: “For women who were having babies for the first time and had complications, referred to as adverse pregnancy outcomes, we found that higher stress levels over time were associated with higher blood pressure levels 2-to-7 years after delivery.
“This suggests that women who had pregnancy complications may be more susceptible to the negative effects of stress on their heart health, and taking steps to manage and reduce stress could be important for protecting long-term heart health.”
The researchers analysed records of 3,322 first-time mothers aged 15 to 44 who did not have high blood pressure before pregnancy.
The women were enrolled at 17 medical centres in eight US states, were pregnant with one baby and were having their first child. According to the authors, 66 per cent of participants self-identified as white, 14 per cent as Hispanic and 11 per cent as Black.
Blood pressure and stress levels were measured during the first and third trimesters, and again two to seven years after delivery.
Stress was assessed using the Perceived Stress Scale, a standard questionnaire that asks how often people feel situations are uncontrollable, unpredictable or overwhelming.
Those who experienced moderate to high stress levels were often younger, between 25 and 27 years of age, had higher body mass index, a measure based on height and weight, and lower educational attainment.
The authors said it is not yet clear exactly how higher stress leads to higher blood pressure in women who had pregnancy complications, and that several factors are likely to be involved.
Nuckols added: “Future studies should examine why women with a history of adverse pregnancy outcomes may be more susceptible to stress-driven increases in blood pressure and test whether stress reduction interventions can actually lower cardiovascular risk for these women.”
High blood pressure during pregnancy can have lasting effects on maternal health, including preeclampsia, eclampsia, stroke or kidney problems, according to the American Heart Association’s 2025 guideline for the prevention, detection, evaluation and management of high blood pressure in adults.
Monitoring blood pressure before, during and after pregnancy is crucial to help prevent and reduce the risk of long-term complications.
Laxmi Mehta is chair of the American Heart Association’s Council on Clinical Cardiology and director of preventive cardiology and women’s cardiovascular health at The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, and was not involved in the study.
Mehta said;’ “This study highlights the powerful connection between the mind and heart, emphasising the importance of stress management, particularly for those who have experienced adverse pregnancy outcomes.
“For the clinical care team, it reinforces the need to proactively assess and address stress as part of the comprehensive care we provide to our patients.
“Future research on whether targeted interventions to reduce or manage stress has a meaningful impact on long-term cardiovascular outcomes will be important as well.”
Diagnosis
Heart disease risk found in mammograms
Fertility4 weeks agoFrance urges 29-year-olds to start families now
Menopause4 weeks agoWomen with ADHD almost twice as likely to experience perimenopause symptoms, study finds
Entrepreneur4 weeks agoKindbody unveils next-gen fertility platform
Entrepreneur2 weeks agoOura launches women’s health AI model
Hormonal health4 weeks agoMenopause specialist Haver joins Midi Health
Opinion4 weeks agoThe $128b paradox: Corporate wellness vs women’s burnout
Entrepreneur4 weeks agoKate Ryder headlines Women’s Health Week USA 2026 as full agenda goes live
Events2 weeks agoWomen’s HealthX launches in Boston this December to transform women’s health through data and science
















1 Comment