Connect with us

Opinion

Defunding equity: The Big Beautiful Bill and the broader crisis in women’s health innovation

Published

on

By Melissa Wallace, CEO & Founding Partner, Fierce Foundry

Imagine if half the population were quietly being cut off from funding, resources, and opportunity. No protests, no headlines—just policies dressed up as reform.

For women, and for those building what little infrastructure exists to support us, this isn’t fiction. It’s policy in action.

Funding is quietly frozen. Grant programmes disappear overnight. Tax policy gets “revised.” And somehow, always, it’s the programmes that support women’s health, economic mobility, and safety that end up on the chopping block.

It’s important to share what this really means but also identify ways we can push back.

A Coordinated Attack Disguised as ‘Efficiency’

Earlier this year, the Department of Justice’s Office on Violence Against Women pulled all open funding opportunities from its site with zero warning.

At the time of writing, the OVW’s homepage showed no active grants available, an eerie confirmation of the freeze.

This isn’t theoretical. These are grants that keep crisis hotlines open. That put lawyers in courtrooms to help women file restraining orders. That ensures shelters can literally keep their lights on.

Then the only federal program focused solely on family planning, Title X, froze $65 million in funding. Again, just look at their homepage.

Providers forced out because of a revived gag rule. Entire counties with no reproductive health access. Proving again, this is not just about budgets.

And more importantly, there’s the NIH.

What was and should always be the gold standard of American medical research, the NIH is now being slowly gutted from the inside out, facing capped indirect costs, grant freezes, and the loss of over 1,000 employees.

Research on maternal mortality, reproductive health, and gender-based health disparities is stalled or abandoned at a time when women’s health outcomes in the U.S. are already in crisis.

Grad programs are pausing admissions. Institutions are rescinding job offers.

It’s crazy to think that if your research centers on women, you’re no longer a priority.

Female Founders Are Feeling It Too

At our Venture Studio, Fierce Foundry, we co-build FemTech companies led by women, so we see firsthand how policy disruptions are stifling innovation.

Leslie Feinzaig at the Female Founders Alliance recently surveyed hundreds of women entrepreneurs. The numbers are brutal:

  • 47 per cent say today’s economy is hurting their business, not because their ideas are weak, but because they’re navigating a toxic mix of cautious buyers, inflation, and frozen grant programmes.
  • 46 per cent say the political climate is actively harming them, with NIH, DoD, and EPA listed as the most disrupted funding sources.
  • Even those who raised money in early 2025: 48 per cent still report negative fallout because the ground keeps shifting beneath them.

We’re not witnessing random cuts. We’re watching a playbook unfold.

When the only thing more unstable than the market is the government meant to support it, you create an environment where risk tolerance drops to zero, and guess who pays the price in a system already biased against women?

Enter H.R.1, the Velvet Hammer

Otherwise known as the ironically named “One Big Beautiful Bill Act”, Congress recently passed H.R.1, a 600+ page legislative mic drop wrapped in “anti-corruption” branding.

In reality, it’s another blow to the nonprofit and startup sectors, especially the ones working in women’s health, climate, education, and equity.

This new law:

  • Complicates how nonprofits advocate, effectively muting mission-driven organisations with compliance red tape
  • Disincentivises charitable giving by eliminating the universal charitable deduction
  • Weakens the Johnson Amendment, opening the door to political manipulation inside nonprofits

Layer this over the already shaky landscape created by the administration’s targeted funding cuts, and you get what looks a lot like a strategic dismantling of the nonprofit sector, death by a thousand policy decisions.

This Isn’t Just Budgeting—It’s a Turning Point

It’s tempting to see these cuts as routine cost-saving measures.

But the patterns tell another story, and it demands our attention.

When funding consistently disappears from domestic violence shelters, reproductive healthcare, scientific research, and community-led nonprofits, we have to ask:

What kind of future are we shaping?

When accountability measures are framed as anti-corruption but silence the very voices meant to advocate for equity, it’s not just government that shrinks, it’s trust, access, and progress.

And those bearing the brunt? Women. Especially women of colour. Especially those building solutions in sectors already under-resourced. Especially those who believed our public systems were meant to include them.

But here’s the opportunity: recognising these patterns allows us to shift course. To build systems that are transparent, equitable, and truly serve the public good.

We have a chance to reimagine not just restore what support for women can and should look like.

So What Now?

This is our moment of reckoning and of responsibility.

If you’re outraged, good. But outrage without action changes nothing.

Call your representatives. Ask them where they stand on funding for the NIH, Title X, and nonprofit protections.

Demand they reverse the cuts that are crippling women’s health and innovation.

Join organisations like the National Council of Nonprofits, League of Women Voters, and Protect Our Care that are tracking these shifts and mobilising action.

Subscribe to policy trackers like G2G, and stay engaged on federal rule changes

affecting women’s health innovation.

Support women-led startups and nonprofits, especially the ones filling gaps left by the government.

And if you have a platform, use it.

Encourage your company to support advocacy coalitions or match donations to affected nonprofits.

The future of FemTech depends on more than great ideas and breakthrough science, it depends on a system willing to invest in women’s health, protect equity-driven founders, and fund the research that saves lives.

When the scaffolding holding up women’s progress collapses, it’s not just women who fall; it’s all of us.

Research proves that when women are economically empowered, communities thrive.

Countries with greater gender equality have stronger economies, healthier families, and more resilient democracies.

When we support women, we don’t just protect half the population; we invest in the whole.

References

  1. “Trump DOJ freezes domestic violence grants, leaving shelters and legal services scrambling”

Politico, March 1, 2025

https://www.politico.com/news/2025/03/01/funding-freeze-domestic-violence-00206807

  1. “Trump administration halts Title X family planning funding in 23 states”

TIME Magazine, April 2025

https://time.com/7276543/title-x-funding-freeze-threatens-states

  1. “Planned Parenthood Faces Steep Financial Losses Amid Trump Budget Cuts”

Wall Street Journal, May 2025

https://www.wsj.com/politics/policy/planned-parenthood-abortion-trump-supreme-court-a0c54920

  1. “Second Presidency of Donald Trump” (NIH Grant Freeze and Layoffs) Wikipedia summary based on multiple government sources, 2025 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_presidency_of_Donald_Trump
  2. “I Am Seeing My Community of Researchers Decimated” The New Yorker, February 2025

https://www.newyorker.com/news/deep-state-diaries/i-am-seeing-my-community-of-researchers-decimated

  1. “Trump Administration Slashes Millions in NIH Funding for Maternal Health, HIV, and Other Research”

Protect Our Care, 2025

https://www.protectourcare.org/its-a-bloodbath-trump-administration-slashes-millions-in-nih-funding

  1. “2025 Female Founder Sentiment Survey”

Female Founders Alliance / Leslie Feinzaig, Q2 2025

(Direct data provided – no public link currently available)

  1. “New Tax Law Threatens Nonprofits’ Ability to Serve Communities” National Council of Nonprofits, April 2025

https://www.councilofnonprofits.org/pressreleases/new-tax-law-threatens-nonprofits-ability-serve-communities

  1. “Congress Passes Major Tax Package—Nonprofits Directly Impacted” National Council of Nonprofits, April 2025

https://www.councilofnonprofits.org/articles/congress-passes-major-tax-package-nonprofits-directly-impacted

  1. “4 Key Elements of H.R.1”

League of Women Voters, March 2025

https://www.lwv.org/blog/4-key-elements-hr1

11.“Trump’s War on the Nonprofit Sector”

The Guardian, April 2025

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/apr/10/trump-administration-authoritarian

Opinion

Why health AI needs to read between the lines

Published

on

Sahar Abid is a Science Associate at Ema EQ, where she works on cultural sensitivity and bias in AI.

A woman asks an AI health assistant about postpartum depression.

She mentions that her in-laws are telling her to “push through” and skip medical help, even as her symptoms get harder to manage. She never says where she is from or names her background.

The assistant describes the condition and gives her a hotline number. It sounds correct, but it misses what she needs.

That gap is more common than the industry admits, and it points to a blind spot in how we test health AI for bias.

Most bias testing looks at what people explicitly say.

The typical way to check an AI for bias is to label a prompt with someone’s demographic details and see if the answer changes. That catches some problems but misses a bigger one.

Most people do not lead with their identity. They lead with their situation. The woman above told the assistant everything it needed to help her, just not in the form of a label.

Her real question was not only “what is postpartum depression?” It was “how do I get care when the people around me don’t want me to?

When family members hold sway over health decisions, and in many communities they do, advice that asks someone to overrule their family is not something they can act on.

The AI didn’t say anything factually wrong. It answered a different question than the one she was living.

We call this culturally implicit bias, meaning the AI misses the cultural context a situation implies rather than the context a person spells out.

When systems are trained to notice only the explicit cues, they fall back on a default answer built for the majority. For everyone else, the response can feel generic, off-target, or discouraging enough that they stop looking for help.

In health, that is not small. The people most likely to be missed are often the ones the system already underserves.

What we set out to test.

At Ema, we wanted to know how well AI picks up on cultural context that is implied but never stated. So we built our own way to test for it, across a range of communities and real situations like postpartum depression and fertility, using questions that carried cultural meaning without announcing it.

The patterns were consistent. Models often missed the meaning underneath the question. They dropped the specific details a person did share and smoothed them into something generic.

And even when they pointed toward real care, they tended to offer one option instead of choices that might actually fit a person’s life. Any one of those can be the difference between someone following the advice and walking away from care.

Why this matters for anyone building health AI.

Getting this right is the right thing to do, and it also works better.

When an answer reflects a person’s real context, people trust and act on the recommendations more, so they get the help and support they need.

Testing for it is harder than the shortcut most teams use. Swapping a name or a demographic label in and out is easy. Checking whether a model actually understands the human context around a question takes more care.

The shortcut teaches models to perform cultural competence instead of practicing it. No matter how much or how little someone chooses to share, they deserve an answer that is warm, complete, and usable.

A better question.

The bar for equitable health AI should be “does it serve someone who never told you who they are?” It is the harder test, but it determines whether real people get help.

The work of getting there is far from finished, and it is exactly what we are building toward at Ema.

Sources: Naidoo, V., & Chadha, K. K. (2025), Culturally responsive AI chatbots: from framework to field evidence, Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans. Souligne, N., & Subbian, V. (2026), FairLogue: A toolkit for intersectional fairness analysis in clinical machine learning models.

Learn more about Ema EQ

Continue Reading

Menopause

anna perimenopause app launches across 39 markets

Published

on

A perimenopause app that maps existing smartwatch data to the menopausal transition has launched across 39 markets in the UK and Europe.

anna app uses information already recorded by wearables, including sleep, heart rate and body temperature, and returns one suggested lifestyle action each morning alongside the research behind it.

The company says each rule in its library links a defined pattern in a woman’s own data to a specific action. The recommendations were developed with an advising clinician and draw on more than 300 published studies.

The company says recommendations are not generated automatically and each can be traced to research reviewed by a doctor.

The app was built by two women in Riga, has been funded without outside investment and was tested with women in the UK over three months before launch.

Perimenopause is the period of hormonal change before periods stop and usually begins after 40.

The company says one of the challenges is the unpredictability of the transition, with sleep, energy, mood and concentration potentially changing from week to week.

Because the experience varies between women, the developers say it can be difficult to find care tailored to individual needs. After 45, there is also no reliable blood test to confirm perimenopause.

The transition can coincide with a busy period in women’s working lives.

CIPD research published in 2023 found that 27 per cent of working women aged 40 to 60 with menopause symptoms said they had affected their career progression, equivalent to around 1.2m women in the UK.

Some 79 per cent said they felt less able to concentrate.

The long-running Study of Women’s Health Across the Nation, which has followed thousands of women through the menopausal transition, found that cognitive difficulties reported during perimenopause appear to be time-limited, with improvement returning in early postmenopause.

The developers say anna differs from standard wearable data by interpreting measurements specifically in the context of perimenopause.

A smartwatch may show changes in sleep, heart rate or temperature, but anna is designed to look at combinations of those signals and link them to lifestyle guidance for that day.

The app is also designed to work without daily symptom logging.

Users can complete an optional daily check-in if they want to add more context, but the app can operate without a symptom diary or daily manual entries.

It uses information from a compatible device the user already owns, such as a watch, ring or band.

Elina Pika-Lepere, co-founder and chief executive of anna app, said: “Perimenopause arrives exactly when a woman has the least spare capacity. She is often at the peak of her career, raising children, caring for ageing parents. What she has lost is not information, it is predictability.

“We built anna to offer a helping hand and evidence-based guidance through a stage that is difficult but temporary.”

The company gave the example of a morning when a user’s watch shows she has slept well below her own 28-day average.

Rather than simply telling her she is tired, anna may suggest choosing one priority and working on it in 25-minute blocks with a short break between them.

The app also displays the sleep and concentration research used for the recommendation.

anna was founded by Pika-Lepere, who spent 15 years building products in advertising, retail and e-commerce, and product lead Zanda Freimane, whose background is in product management in fintech and e-commerce.

The wider team includes a mathematician and university researcher advising on data architecture, a senior developer and a user experience adviser from a Baltic unicorn company.

anna app is not a medical device and does not provide medical advice.

Its guidance is limited to lifestyle support, and the company describes the app as a tool to complement a doctor rather than replace professional medical care.

anna app is available on iOS across 39 markets in the UK and Europe and is listed on the App Store as anna: Perimenopause & Sleep.

The app is in English and works with Apple Watch, Garmin, Fitbit, Oura and Whoop through Apple Health.

The company says user data is hosted in the EU and is never sold.

The service costs £13.99 a month or £99.99 a year in the UK and €14.99 a month or €99.99 a year in the euro area after a seven-day free trial.

Continue Reading

Opinion

Should men be talking about periods? Absolutely. Here is what every man should know

Published

on

By Ruby Raut, founder, WUKA

Every time we post a dad talking to his daughter about periods, the internet seems to split in two.

One side says: “This is brilliant. I wish my dad had spoken to me like this.”
The other says: “Why on earth are men talking about periods?”

And I always find that second reaction fascinating.

  • Because men might not menstruate, but they live in a world with people who do.
  • Your daughter might get her first period while you are the only parent at home.
  • Your teenage niece might bleed through her clothes while you are driving her somewhere.
  • Your girlfriend might wake up at 3am with cramps.
  • Your wife might suddenly realise she has run out of period products.
  • A colleague might bleed through her trousers during a meeting.
  • A girl you coach might quietly tell you she cannot play because she has started her period.

At some point in your life, there is a very good chance a woman or girl will have a period around you.

And at that moment, you have two options. You can be calm, informed and useful. Or you can stand there looking as if nobody ever taught you what a period actually involves.

So perhaps we need a Haynes manual for men and periods. Not a biology degree or a lecture.Just the information every man should probably know.

First: yes, men should know what a period actually is

Let us start with the basics. A period is not simply “a bit of blood once a month”.

Menstruation is part of the menstrual cycle. The lining of the uterus builds up and, if there is no pregnancy, that lining is shed.

That is the bleeding part. But for many women and girls, the experience can also involve cramps, back pain, headaches, bloating, tiredness, diarrhoea, tender breasts, mood changes and generally feeling pretty rotten.

Some barely notice their period. Others are completely floored by it. This is important because one of the least helpful things you can say to somebody struggling with their period is:

“Is it really that bad?”

You do not need to experience period pain to believe someone when they tell you they are in pain.

Second: if a girl tells you she has started her period, do not panic

This one is particularly important for dads.

Imagine your daughter gets her first period while Mum is out. What does she need from you? Probably not a horrified expression or you shouting across the house, “YOUR PERIOD HAS STARTED!”

She needs you to behave as though this is an entirely normal bodily function.

Because it is. Ask her what she needs. Find her a period product. If there is blood on her clothes, help her sort it out without making a huge fuss. If she does not know how to use a pad or period underwear, help her find clear instructions.

And please do not make jokes about her “becoming a woman”.

For a young girl, a first period can already feel confusing, embarrassing and frightening. Your job is not to make it into a ceremony but to make her feel safe. Sometimes the most useful sentence a dad can say is simply:

“Okay. No problem. What do you need?”

Third: learn what period products actually are

Pads.Tampons.Period underwear.Menstrual cups.Period swimwear. You do not have to develop strong opinions about all of them. You just need to know they exist.

If someone asks you to buy pads, do not behave as though you have been sent into a nuclear reactor without protective clothing.

Go to the period aisle. Text them a photo if you are unsure. Ask which absorbency they want. Buy the product. Come home.

And if you are the father of a daughter, having a few period products in the bathroom before she starts menstruating is a very sensible idea.

You keep toilet roll in your house before somebody needs it. Period products should not feel radically different.

Fourth: never announce a period stain

This should be basic human etiquette.

If you notice that a woman or girl has bled through her clothes, tell her quietly and discreetly.

Do not point, laugh, or whisper about it to someone else. And definitely never announce it to the room.

If you have a jumper or jacket she can tie around her waist, offer it. If there is somewhere she can clean up or change, help her get there. Then move on with your life.

Period leaks happen. The embarrassment surrounding them is often far worse than the actual blood.

Fifth: stop using periods as an explanation for every emotion

“Are you on your period?”

Four words capable of making almost any disagreement significantly worse.

Sometimes a woman is angry because she is angry and sometimes she disagrees with you because she disagrees with you. Sometimes you genuinely are being annoying.

Hormonal changes can affect mood for some people, but using menstruation to dismiss a woman’s feelings is patronising and incredibly unhelpful.

If your partner says she feels emotional before her period, listen to her. That does not permit you to diagnose every future disagreement as PMS.

Sixth: period pain is not something every woman should simply put up with

There is an extraordinary tendency to tell girls from a young age that painful periods are just part of being female. For some, mild cramps are manageable.

For others, period pain can be severe enough to disrupt school, work, sleep, exercise and everyday life. So if your daughter is doubled over in pain every month, repeatedly missing school, fainting, vomiting or unable to function normally, do not tell her to toughen up.

Take her seriously and help her seek medical advice.

Being a supportive dad does not require you to know what is causing her symptoms. It requires you to believe her when she says something is wrong.

Seventh: men talking about periods does not take anything away from women

This is perhaps the strangest objection to our Dads and Periods campaign. The idea that periods somehow belong in a conversation that only women are allowed to have.

Women should absolutely lead conversations about their own bodies and experiences. But understanding periods should not be restricted to people who menstruate.

We teach children about digestion even though they are not gastroenterologists and about first aid even though most people are not doctors.

We teach boys about pregnancy even though they will never be pregnant. Knowledge is not ownership. A father understanding periods does not make periods less female. It makes him a better prepared father.

A boy understanding periods does not mean he suddenly understands exactly what menstruation feels like. It means he is less likely to laugh when a girl gets a stain on her skirt.

A male coach understanding periods does not make him an expert on women’s bodies.

It means a teenage player might feel able to tell him why she needs five minutes off the pitch instead of inventing an excuse.

A male partner understanding periods does not mean he has to track every detail of his girlfriend’s cycle. It might simply mean that when she says, “My cramps are awful today,” his response is not, “Again?”

So should men talk about periods?

Yes.

But perhaps “talk” is not even the most important word.

Men should know about periods. Men should be comfortable hearing about periods. Men should know what to do when someone starts one unexpectedly. Men should know how to buy period products. Men should know not to make somebody feel ashamed about bleeding.

And fathers, in particular, should be able to talk about periods with their daughters without embarrassment.

Because there is a bigger point here. Girls learn very quickly which subjects make adults uncomfortable.

If Dad goes silent every time periods are mentioned, she notices. If he leaves every period conversation to Mum, she notices. If he wrinkles his nose at period products, she notices. And she may quietly absorb the message that this part of her body is something men find disgusting or embarrassing.

That is exactly the message we should be trying to dismantle.

At WUKA, we started our Dads and Periods campaign because we want fathers to feel capable of having these conversations.

Not perfectly. Not scientifically. Not with a PowerPoint presentation about the uterus over Sunday lunch. Just normally. Periods happen.

Roughly half the population will experience them at some point in their lives. The other half should probably know what they are.

And if the choice is between a dad who knows what a period is, knows where the period products are kept and can calmly help his daughter when she needs him, or a dad hovering helplessly outside the bathroom shouting, “SHALL I CALL YOUR MUM?”

I know which one I would rather have.

Learn more about WUKA at wuka.co.uk

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025 Aspect Health Media Ltd. All Rights Reserved.