News
14 NHS trusts to be investigated over maternity care ‘failures’
Fourteen NHS trusts will have their maternity services investigated after long-running system failures, the government has confirmed.
The investigations form part of a rapid review of England’s maternity services announced in June. Health secretary Wes Streeting praised the “extraordinary courage” of bereaved families who raised concerns spanning 15 years.
Some families have criticised the process, calling the review “not fit for purpose” and Streeting’s response inadequate.
Baroness Amos, who is chairing the review, told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme she hoped families would “get the justice that they want and that they deserve.”
She described the situation — where trusts had already been investigated, “hundreds” of recommendations made, yet new reviews are still required — as “completely unacceptable.”
Research by baby loss charities Sands and Tommy’s suggested better care could have prevented more than 800 baby deaths in 2022–23.
Streeting chose a rapid review instead of a national inquiry into maternity care, despite families calling for one.
The review, originally due to finish in December, will now report in spring 2026, with interim findings expected around Christmas. It will look at family and staff experiences in maternity care and why previous inquiry recommendations from Morecambe Bay, East Kent, and Shrewsbury and Telford failed to bring lasting improvements.
Past inquiries exposed issues including dismissal of women’s concerns, weak leadership, failure to learn from safety incidents, and damaging workplace cultures. Families continue to report poor care.
Baroness Amos said “particular attention” would be paid to why black and Asian families have worse outcomes.
The Department of Health said the trusts were chosen based on data analysis, family feedback, and geographical and demographic representation.
The Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists warned the focus would “create real anxiety among women, families and staff” at the 14 trusts.
It added that the review would need to re-build a world class maternity system.
“Too many women and babies are not getting the safe, compassionate care they deserve and the maternity workforce is on its knees, with staff leaving the profession,” said the college’s president, Prof Ranee Thakar.
The Maternity Safety Alliance (MSA), which represents families affected by poor care, delivered the strongest criticism.
It accused Streeting of “broken promises” over the investigation’s scope and management, saying families felt “used.”
They particularly condemned the decision not to examine NHS regulators, including the Care Quality Commission and NHS Resolution, the service’s insurance and litigation arm.
“The review seems to have already decided that all the responsibility for these 800 deaths a year lies squarely with NHS trusts and the clinicians who work in them,” said Tom Hender, who lost his son Aubrey in 2022.
“That’s just not true — the whole system is in crisis and we need a whole system approach.”
The MSA said the investigation was “not fit for purpose” and would not achieve Streeting’s stated aims, adding: “It is clear that only a statutory public inquiry can end the crisis in maternity care.”
Baroness Amos responded that the terms of reference were broad given the timeframe and regulators were “not excluded,” but added: “The kind of in-depth review that is being requested is not something that I am able to conduct.”
The two families who successfully campaigned for an investigation into maternity care in Shrewsbury and Telford called the review “an important and brave first step.”
However, the parents of Kate Stanton-Davies and Pippa Griffiths said it would be “safer” if the review proceeded more slowly, stressing the need for proper mental health support for families sharing their stories.
“It’s not enough to have a nominal support figure in the room and an email address for follow-up,” they said.
The ongoing challenges facing maternity services were highlighted last week.
On Monday, a review at Gloucestershire Hospitals found nine baby deaths between 2020 and 2023 could have been avoided.
Then on Friday, a report revealed over half of maternity and neonatal buildings were rated unsatisfactory, with 7 per cent at risk of imminent breakdown.
Charles Massey, chief executive of the General Medical Council, is expected to tell a Manchester conference that a “toxic” NHS cover-up culture leads to poor maternity outcomes.
He will say “patient safety is falling victim to unhealthy culture” and that “the unthinkable — harm to mothers and their babies – is at risk of being normalised.”
Diagnosis
Lung cancer drug shows breast cancer potential
Ovarian cancer cells quickly activate survival responses after PARP inhibitor treatment, and a lung cancer drug could help block this, research suggests.
PARP inhibitors are a common treatment for ovarian cancer, particularly in tumours with faulty DNA repair. They stop cancer cells fixing DNA damage, which leads to cell death, but many tumours later stop responding.
Researchers identified a way cancer cells may survive PARP inhibitor treatment from the outset, pointing to a potential way to block that response. A Mayo Clinic team found ovarian cancer cells rapidly switch on a pro-survival programme after exposure to PARP inhibitors. A key driver is FRA1, a transcription factor (a protein that turns genes on and off) that helps cancer cells adapt and avoid death.
The team then tested whether brigatinib, a drug approved for certain lung cancers, could block this response and boost the effect of PARP inhibitors. Brigatinib was chosen because it inhibits multiple signalling pathways involved in cancer cell survival.
In laboratory studies, combining brigatinib with a PARP inhibitor was more effective than either treatment alone. Notably, the effect was seen in cancer cells but not normal cells, suggesting a more targeted approach.
Brigatinib also appeared to act in an unexpected way. Rather than working through the usual DNA repair routes, it shut down two signalling molecules, FAK and EPHA2, that aggressive ovarian cancer cells rely on. FAK and EPHA2 are proteins that relay survival signals inside cells. Blocking both at once weakened the cells’ ability to adapt and resist treatment, making them more vulnerable to PARP inhibitors.
Tumours with higher levels of FAK and EPHA2 responded better to the drug combination. Other data link high levels of these molecules to more aggressive disease, pointing to potential benefit in harder-to-treat cases.
Arun Kanakkanthara, an oncology investigator at Mayo Clinic and a senior author of the study, said: “This work shows that drug resistance does not always emerge slowly over time; cancer cells can activate survival programmes very early after treatment begins.”
John Weroha, a medical oncologist at Mayo Clinic and a senior author of the study, said: “From a clinical perspective, resistance remains one of the biggest challenges in treating ovarian cancer. By combining mechanistic insights from Dr Kanakkanthara’s laboratory with my clinical experience, this preclinical work supports the strategy of targeting resistance early, before it has a chance to take hold. This strategy could improve patient outcomes.”
Insight
Higher nighttime temps linked to increased risk of autism diagnosis in children – study
Entrepreneur
Kindbody unveils next-gen fertility platform
-
Insight2 weeks agoParents sue IVF clinic after delivering someone else’s baby
-
Menopause3 weeks agoWomen’s health could unlock US$100bn by 2030
-
Insight4 weeks agoChina’s birth rate hits record low despite government fertility efforts
-
Menopause3 weeks agoHRT linked to greater weight loss on tirzepatide
-
Entrepreneur7 days agoUS startup builds wearable hormone tracker
-
Menopause3 weeks agoFlo Health and Mayo Clinic publish global perimenopause awareness study
-
Menopause2 weeks agoStudy reveals gap between perimenopause expectations and experience
-
Fertility6 days agoFrance urges 29-year-olds to start families now








