Opinion
From platforms to people: The next era of femtech

By Katrina Zalcmane, head of partnerships and growth, Véa
The next era of femtech shifts focus from platforms to people as women rethink how technology fits into wellness and social life.
Women are spending less time on ambient, always-on digital environments and more time in bounded, intentional, in-person settings.
This is not a rejection of technology but a reprioritisation of how and where it belongs. For femtech, this shift is not cosmetic. It signals a structural change in user expectations – one that has implications for product design, engagement models and long-term relevance.
I explore three key signals underpinning this shift: reduced engagement with social media platforms, the resurgence of in-person, women-led communities and growing fatigue with fragmented digital tools.
Signal 1: Declining Engagement With Social Platforms Among Women
Multiple data sources point to a flattening or decline in engagement with traditional social media platforms, particularly among women:
- Pew Research Center reports that adults are increasingly “actively limiting” their social media use, with women more likely than men to cite emotional exhaustion and reduced wellbeing as reasons.
- Ofcom’s Online Nation report shows year-on-year declines in time spent on social platforms among UK women aged 25–44, alongside rising use of messaging and offline coordination tools.
- Meta itself has acknowledged a shift away from “social graph” engagement toward private, smaller-group interactions in recent earnings calls.
While this is not mass abandonment, it does indicate selective withdrawal: fewer platforms, less ambient presence, more intentional use.
Signal 2: The Rise of In-Person, Women-Led Communities
At the same time, participation in physical, community-based activities has increased. Examples include:
- the growth of women-led run clubs and fitness collectives across major cities, often operating independently of digital platforms;
- the expansion of paid, small-scale retreats and circles focused on reflection, creativity or embodiment;
- increased demand for local, recurring group experiences rather than one-off events.
While women are stepping back from social platforms, they are stepping into real-world communities. ONS data on social capital shows a post-pandemic rebound in in-person participation, particularly among women aged 25-45, with a preference for smaller, repeat gatherings over large social events.
What distinguishes this wave of community-building is intentionality. These spaces are bounded, often invitation-based and deliberately offline.
They are designed to counteract overstimulation rather than add to it.
Signal 3: Tool Fatigue and the Consolidation of Digital Habits
Alongside social media fatigue, there is growing evidence of “tool fatigue” across wellness and productivity categories:
- App retention rates across health and wellness remain low, with industry benchmarks showing that fewer than 25 per cent of users remain active after 30 days.
- Deloitte’s Digital Consumer Trends report notes a move toward app consolidation, with users preferring fewer, multi-purpose tools over fragmented stacks.
- Qualitative studies show women are particularly sensitive to cognitive overload caused by managing multiple apps for mood, cycles, health, reflection and social coordination*.
The implication is not that women want less support but that they want smarter, simpler tools that can actually help manage their inner lives.
What This Means: A Shift in the Role of Technology
Taken together, these signals point to a clear trend: technology is moving from being a primary site of social life to a supporting layer around it.
Women are not asking apps to become communities. They are asking them to:
- help them reflect and process privately;
- reduce cognitive and emotional clutter;
- support real-world relationships rather than replace them;
- operate in bounded, intentional ways.
This reframes success metrics. Engagement time and daily active use become less meaningful than whether a tool genuinely increases capacity, clarity and presence outside the app.
Implications for Femtech
For femtech, this marks a decisive transition. The first phase of femtech focused on visibility: tracking cycles, symptoms and bodily data that had previously been ignored.
The next phase will focus on integration: helping women make sense of experience in ways that support how they live, relate and gather.
Femtech products that attempt to:
- replicate community digitally,
- build social feeds under the banner of wellbeing,
- position AI as a substitute for real connection,
risk misaligning with where behaviour is actually moving.
By contrast, femtech that treats technology as infrastructure, not destination, is better positioned for longevity.
Where Véa Fits
Véa was built with this shift in mind.
Rather than attempting to replace connection or build another social layer, Véa focuses on internal processing – neuroscience-backed journaling, emotional pattern recognition and reflective AI support – so that women can show up more clearly in their real lives.
Importantly, Véa is not only a digital tool.
It is designed to extend into physical space, through curated in-person experiences and community gatherings that prioritise presence, embodiment and shared reflection.
The digital layer exists to support the human one, not compete with it. In a context of tool fatigue and selective disengagement, this hybrid model – digital support paired with real-world interaction – aligns closely with how women are choosing to engage today.
Over the next decade, the most resilient femtech products will not be those that maximise time spent inside ecosystems but those that give women back the capacity to return to their lives – with greater clarity, energy and real-world connection.
It’s time to design femtech that empowers presence over engagement.
*Reich-Stiebert, N., Froehlich, L. and Voltmer, J.-B. (2023). ‘Gendered mental labor: A systematic literature review on the cognitive dimension of unpaid work within the household and childcare’, Sex Roles, 88, pp. 475–494.
Opinion
Why health AI needs to read between the lines

Sahar Abid is a Science Associate at Ema EQ, where she works on cultural sensitivity and bias in AI.
A woman asks an AI health assistant about postpartum depression.
She mentions that her in-laws are telling her to “push through” and skip medical help, even as her symptoms get harder to manage. She never says where she is from or names her background.
The assistant describes the condition and gives her a hotline number. It sounds correct, but it misses what she needs.
That gap is more common than the industry admits, and it points to a blind spot in how we test health AI for bias.
Most bias testing looks at what people explicitly say.
The typical way to check an AI for bias is to label a prompt with someone’s demographic details and see if the answer changes. That catches some problems but misses a bigger one.
Most people do not lead with their identity. They lead with their situation. The woman above told the assistant everything it needed to help her, just not in the form of a label.
Her real question was not only “what is postpartum depression?” It was “how do I get care when the people around me don’t want me to?
When family members hold sway over health decisions, and in many communities they do, advice that asks someone to overrule their family is not something they can act on.
The AI didn’t say anything factually wrong. It answered a different question than the one she was living.
We call this culturally implicit bias, meaning the AI misses the cultural context a situation implies rather than the context a person spells out.
When systems are trained to notice only the explicit cues, they fall back on a default answer built for the majority. For everyone else, the response can feel generic, off-target, or discouraging enough that they stop looking for help.
In health, that is not small. The people most likely to be missed are often the ones the system already underserves.
What we set out to test.
At Ema, we wanted to know how well AI picks up on cultural context that is implied but never stated. So we built our own way to test for it, across a range of communities and real situations like postpartum depression and fertility, using questions that carried cultural meaning without announcing it.
The patterns were consistent. Models often missed the meaning underneath the question. They dropped the specific details a person did share and smoothed them into something generic.
And even when they pointed toward real care, they tended to offer one option instead of choices that might actually fit a person’s life. Any one of those can be the difference between someone following the advice and walking away from care.
Why this matters for anyone building health AI.
Getting this right is the right thing to do, and it also works better.
When an answer reflects a person’s real context, people trust and act on the recommendations more, so they get the help and support they need.
Testing for it is harder than the shortcut most teams use. Swapping a name or a demographic label in and out is easy. Checking whether a model actually understands the human context around a question takes more care.
The shortcut teaches models to perform cultural competence instead of practicing it. No matter how much or how little someone chooses to share, they deserve an answer that is warm, complete, and usable.
A better question.
The bar for equitable health AI should be “does it serve someone who never told you who they are?” It is the harder test, but it determines whether real people get help.
The work of getting there is far from finished, and it is exactly what we are building toward at Ema.
Sources: Naidoo, V., & Chadha, K. K. (2025), Culturally responsive AI chatbots: from framework to field evidence, Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans. Souligne, N., & Subbian, V. (2026), FairLogue: A toolkit for intersectional fairness analysis in clinical machine learning models.
Opinion
anna perimenopause app launches across 39 markets

A perimenopause app that maps existing smartwatch data to the menopausal transition has launched across 39 markets in the UK and Europe.
anna app uses information already recorded by wearables, including sleep, heart rate and body temperature, and returns one suggested lifestyle action each morning alongside the research behind it.
The company says each rule in its library links a defined pattern in a woman’s own data to a specific action. The recommendations were developed with an advising clinician and draw on more than 300 published studies.

The company says recommendations are not generated automatically and each can be traced to research reviewed by a doctor.
The app was built by two women in Riga, has been funded without outside investment and was tested with women in the UK over three months before launch.
Perimenopause is the period of hormonal change before periods stop and usually begins after 40.
The company says one of the challenges is the unpredictability of the transition, with sleep, energy, mood and concentration potentially changing from week to week.
Because the experience varies between women, the developers say it can be difficult to find care tailored to individual needs. After 45, there is also no reliable blood test to confirm perimenopause.
The transition can coincide with a busy period in women’s working lives.
CIPD research published in 2023 found that 27 per cent of working women aged 40 to 60 with menopause symptoms said they had affected their career progression, equivalent to around 1.2m women in the UK.
Some 79 per cent said they felt less able to concentrate.
The long-running Study of Women’s Health Across the Nation, which has followed thousands of women through the menopausal transition, found that cognitive difficulties reported during perimenopause appear to be time-limited, with improvement returning in early postmenopause.
The developers say anna differs from standard wearable data by interpreting measurements specifically in the context of perimenopause.
A smartwatch may show changes in sleep, heart rate or temperature, but anna is designed to look at combinations of those signals and link them to lifestyle guidance for that day.
The app is also designed to work without daily symptom logging.
Users can complete an optional daily check-in if they want to add more context, but the app can operate without a symptom diary or daily manual entries.
It uses information from a compatible device the user already owns, such as a watch, ring or band.
Elina Pika-Lepere, co-founder and chief executive of anna app, said: “Perimenopause arrives exactly when a woman has the least spare capacity. She is often at the peak of her career, raising children, caring for ageing parents. What she has lost is not information, it is predictability.
“We built anna to offer a helping hand and evidence-based guidance through a stage that is difficult but temporary.”
The company gave the example of a morning when a user’s watch shows she has slept well below her own 28-day average.
Rather than simply telling her she is tired, anna may suggest choosing one priority and working on it in 25-minute blocks with a short break between them.
The app also displays the sleep and concentration research used for the recommendation.
anna was founded by Pika-Lepere, who spent 15 years building products in advertising, retail and e-commerce, and product lead Zanda Freimane, whose background is in product management in fintech and e-commerce.
The wider team includes a mathematician and university researcher advising on data architecture, a senior developer and a user experience adviser from a Baltic unicorn company.
anna app is not a medical device and does not provide medical advice.
Its guidance is limited to lifestyle support, and the company describes the app as a tool to complement a doctor rather than replace professional medical care.
anna app is available on iOS across 39 markets in the UK and Europe and is listed on the App Store as anna: Perimenopause & Sleep.
The app is in English and works with Apple Watch, Garmin, Fitbit, Oura and Whoop through Apple Health.
The company says user data is hosted in the EU and is never sold.
The service costs £13.99 a month or £99.99 a year in the UK and €14.99 a month or €99.99 a year in the euro area after a seven-day free trial.
Opinion
Should men be talking about periods? Absolutely. Here is what every man should know

By Ruby Raut, founder, WUKA
Every time we post a dad talking to his daughter about periods, the internet seems to split in two.
One side says: “This is brilliant. I wish my dad had spoken to me like this.”
The other says: “Why on earth are men talking about periods?”

And I always find that second reaction fascinating.
- Because men might not menstruate, but they live in a world with people who do.
- Your daughter might get her first period while you are the only parent at home.
- Your teenage niece might bleed through her clothes while you are driving her somewhere.
- Your girlfriend might wake up at 3am with cramps.
- Your wife might suddenly realise she has run out of period products.
- A colleague might bleed through her trousers during a meeting.
- A girl you coach might quietly tell you she cannot play because she has started her period.
At some point in your life, there is a very good chance a woman or girl will have a period around you.
And at that moment, you have two options. You can be calm, informed and useful. Or you can stand there looking as if nobody ever taught you what a period actually involves.
So perhaps we need a Haynes manual for men and periods. Not a biology degree or a lecture.Just the information every man should probably know.
First: yes, men should know what a period actually is
Let us start with the basics. A period is not simply “a bit of blood once a month”.
Menstruation is part of the menstrual cycle. The lining of the uterus builds up and, if there is no pregnancy, that lining is shed.
That is the bleeding part. But for many women and girls, the experience can also involve cramps, back pain, headaches, bloating, tiredness, diarrhoea, tender breasts, mood changes and generally feeling pretty rotten.
Some barely notice their period. Others are completely floored by it. This is important because one of the least helpful things you can say to somebody struggling with their period is:
“Is it really that bad?”
You do not need to experience period pain to believe someone when they tell you they are in pain.
Second: if a girl tells you she has started her period, do not panic
This one is particularly important for dads.
Imagine your daughter gets her first period while Mum is out. What does she need from you? Probably not a horrified expression or you shouting across the house, “YOUR PERIOD HAS STARTED!”
She needs you to behave as though this is an entirely normal bodily function.
Because it is. Ask her what she needs. Find her a period product. If there is blood on her clothes, help her sort it out without making a huge fuss. If she does not know how to use a pad or period underwear, help her find clear instructions.
And please do not make jokes about her “becoming a woman”.
For a young girl, a first period can already feel confusing, embarrassing and frightening. Your job is not to make it into a ceremony but to make her feel safe. Sometimes the most useful sentence a dad can say is simply:
“Okay. No problem. What do you need?”
Third: learn what period products actually are
Pads.Tampons.Period underwear.Menstrual cups.Period swimwear. You do not have to develop strong opinions about all of them. You just need to know they exist.
If someone asks you to buy pads, do not behave as though you have been sent into a nuclear reactor without protective clothing.
Go to the period aisle. Text them a photo if you are unsure. Ask which absorbency they want. Buy the product. Come home.
And if you are the father of a daughter, having a few period products in the bathroom before she starts menstruating is a very sensible idea.
You keep toilet roll in your house before somebody needs it. Period products should not feel radically different.
Fourth: never announce a period stain
This should be basic human etiquette.
If you notice that a woman or girl has bled through her clothes, tell her quietly and discreetly.
Do not point, laugh, or whisper about it to someone else. And definitely never announce it to the room.
If you have a jumper or jacket she can tie around her waist, offer it. If there is somewhere she can clean up or change, help her get there. Then move on with your life.
Period leaks happen. The embarrassment surrounding them is often far worse than the actual blood.
Fifth: stop using periods as an explanation for every emotion
“Are you on your period?”
Four words capable of making almost any disagreement significantly worse.
Sometimes a woman is angry because she is angry and sometimes she disagrees with you because she disagrees with you. Sometimes you genuinely are being annoying.
Hormonal changes can affect mood for some people, but using menstruation to dismiss a woman’s feelings is patronising and incredibly unhelpful.
If your partner says she feels emotional before her period, listen to her. That does not permit you to diagnose every future disagreement as PMS.
Sixth: period pain is not something every woman should simply put up with
There is an extraordinary tendency to tell girls from a young age that painful periods are just part of being female. For some, mild cramps are manageable.
For others, period pain can be severe enough to disrupt school, work, sleep, exercise and everyday life. So if your daughter is doubled over in pain every month, repeatedly missing school, fainting, vomiting or unable to function normally, do not tell her to toughen up.
Take her seriously and help her seek medical advice.
Being a supportive dad does not require you to know what is causing her symptoms. It requires you to believe her when she says something is wrong.
Seventh: men talking about periods does not take anything away from women
This is perhaps the strangest objection to our Dads and Periods campaign. The idea that periods somehow belong in a conversation that only women are allowed to have.
Women should absolutely lead conversations about their own bodies and experiences. But understanding periods should not be restricted to people who menstruate.
We teach children about digestion even though they are not gastroenterologists and about first aid even though most people are not doctors.
We teach boys about pregnancy even though they will never be pregnant. Knowledge is not ownership. A father understanding periods does not make periods less female. It makes him a better prepared father.
A boy understanding periods does not mean he suddenly understands exactly what menstruation feels like. It means he is less likely to laugh when a girl gets a stain on her skirt.
A male coach understanding periods does not make him an expert on women’s bodies.
It means a teenage player might feel able to tell him why she needs five minutes off the pitch instead of inventing an excuse.
A male partner understanding periods does not mean he has to track every detail of his girlfriend’s cycle. It might simply mean that when she says, “My cramps are awful today,” his response is not, “Again?”
So should men talk about periods?
Yes.
But perhaps “talk” is not even the most important word.
Men should know about periods. Men should be comfortable hearing about periods. Men should know what to do when someone starts one unexpectedly. Men should know how to buy period products. Men should know not to make somebody feel ashamed about bleeding.
And fathers, in particular, should be able to talk about periods with their daughters without embarrassment.
Because there is a bigger point here. Girls learn very quickly which subjects make adults uncomfortable.
If Dad goes silent every time periods are mentioned, she notices. If he leaves every period conversation to Mum, she notices. If he wrinkles his nose at period products, she notices. And she may quietly absorb the message that this part of her body is something men find disgusting or embarrassing.
That is exactly the message we should be trying to dismantle.
At WUKA, we started our Dads and Periods campaign because we want fathers to feel capable of having these conversations.
Not perfectly. Not scientifically. Not with a PowerPoint presentation about the uterus over Sunday lunch. Just normally. Periods happen.
Roughly half the population will experience them at some point in their lives. The other half should probably know what they are.
And if the choice is between a dad who knows what a period is, knows where the period products are kept and can calmly help his daughter when she needs him, or a dad hovering helplessly outside the bathroom shouting, “SHALL I CALL YOUR MUM?”
I know which one I would rather have.
Learn more about WUKA at wuka.co.uk
Hormonal health2 weeks agoMajor UK study could be a ‘game-changer’ for heavy periods and endometriosis
Entrepreneur5 days agoKOVE Medical raises €1.7 million to improve safety of foetal surgery
Fertility2 weeks agoOne week left to apply: W Accelerate with Merck KGaA and M Ventures
Pregnancy6 days agoUK study aims to transform maternity care for high-risk pregnancies
Menopause2 weeks agoQuarter of women miss work due to menstual symptoms, survey finds
Mental health1 week agoPMDD after SSRIs or hormones: Why the brain may be the missing treatment target
Diagnosis1 week agoArk Surgical secures further institutional backing to accelerate US expansion
Insight2 weeks agoStudy to tackle years-long delays in endometriosis diagnosis











2 Comments