Connect with us

Diagnosis

World-first at-home test delivers more accurate gestational diabetes diagnoses

Published

on

Standard NHS procedures for processing gestational diabetes blood sugar tests lead to more than 50 per cent of cases being missed, shows research, which could lead to serious complications for mothers.

Such complications include the development of preeclampsia, and for the baby an increased risk of admission to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit for breathing difficulties, low blood sugar and in some severe cases, a risk of major complications including stillbirth and death.

These risks can be reduced with timely diagnosis and intervention during the pregnancy. The study found that processing the blood sugar test of mothers at risk of gestational diabetes more quickly could lead to more accurate diagnosis of this serious condition.

Now, a new world-first at-home oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) analyses the blood sugar tests immediately, with results instantly shared with the requesting antenatal care team for diagnosis and clinical review.

This overcomes the problems with sample processing and delayed testing carried out in hospital or community-based. The GTT@home test is already being successfully used by NHS trusts.

Using standard NHS sample processing procedures, 9 per cent of women in the study were diagnosed with gestational diabetes. The researchers found that when blood was processed more quickly, 22 per cent of women in the study were found to have gestational diabetes, a difference of 13 per cent. Without faster sample processing, more than half the women found to have gestational diabetes would have gone undiagnosed.

Professor of chemical pathology and diabetes in pregnancy, Claire Meek, said: “Gestational diabetes, which affects women in pregnancy, is very common in the UK and causes complications at the time of birth, affecting both mother and child.

“Fortunately, most complications can be prevented by accurate diagnosis and access to treatment. However, if the diagnosis is not accurate, then affected mothers cannot access the treatment they need.”

The Digostics GTT@home test not only avoids the false negative results issues identified in Professor Meek’s study but is also more convenient and accessible as the patient doesn’t have travel, especially as the test must be carried out first thing in the morning.

Travelling to take the test means patients must arrange childcare, take time off work, or manage transportation, and studies have shown that women from socio-economically deprived groups, black ethnicity, or with mental health issues are less likely to attend or complete OGTT appointments.

With at-home testing women who may have struggled to attend clinic-based tests can take the test when convenient for them.

James Jackson, founder and CEO of Digostics, said: “Professor Meek’s research definitively shows that in the UK’s standard OGTT testing is failing to diagnose more than 50 per cent of women who have gestational diabetes during pregnancy.

“Without a diagnosis, the risks of gestational diabetes cannot be mitigated and mothers and babies are being left at risk of serious, lifelong, and life-threatening health complications.

“The at-home OGTT we have developed avoids the sample processing delays identified in professor Meek’s research, and we’re identifying a higher rate of gestational diabetes than in-clinic OGTTs. Patients find the test easy to use and we’re extending access to screening to women from underserved patient groups frequently marginalised by in-clinic OGTT provision.

“The GTT@home test is in use across a number of NHS Trusts in England, and we are in discussions with many more to make this important new technology available to more expectant mothers who are at risk of gestational diabetes.”

Entrepreneur

TidalSense raises £14m to expand five-minute COPD test across NHS

Published

on

Cambridge health tech company TidalSense has secured £14.2m in funding led by Cross-Border Impact Ventures to expand its AI-powered lung disease test across the NHS and into Europe and the US.

The investment, which also includes returning backers BGF, Airstream Capital and Foresight Group, will fund the rollout of a handheld diagnostic device that can detect chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in as little as five minutes.

It will also support the development of software to diagnose asthma using the same platform.

Donna Parr is managing partner at Cross-Border Impact Ventures.

She said: We look for technology that doesn’t just have a compelling story, but a body of clinical evidence behind it.

“TidalSense has both, with a CEO who has lived the problem she’s solving, and a product that’s already live within the NHS healthcare environment, saving time for patients who have waited years for an answer.

“It is also technology that can improve access to appropriate treatment for COPD sufferers on a global basis and especially for women who are often misdiagnosed.

“This is exactly the kind of impact we want to make with our investments.”

COPD, a progressive condition that restricts airflow and makes breathing increasingly difficult, is the third leading cause of death in England, according to the NHS.

It is responsible for about 30,000 deaths each year and costs the health service an estimated £1.9bn annually.

The company believes its technology could transform how respiratory disease is diagnosed by replacing the need for conventional spirometry in many settings.

Patients simply breathe normally into the handheld device for 75 seconds while artificial intelligence analyses the breath in real time.

A diagnosis is then displayed on screen, allowing clinicians to complete the entire process in around five minutes.

TidalSense says the technology allows clinicians to assess as many as six patients an hour, compared with roughly one an hour using spirometry, which has remained the standard diagnostic test for COPD despite changing little since it was first developed in the 19th century.

Spirometry requires patients to perform forceful breathing manoeuvres and typically needs specialist staff to administer.

TidalSense chief executive Ameera Patel said: “Our ambition is really bold and broad, and it is to have a really significant impact at a population level on chronic respiratory diseases like COPD and asthma.

“We want the test to be available to anyone the first time they present with symptoms, so there’s no bias in accessibility based on where you live, your socio-economic status or your ethnicity.”

Founded in 2013 by chief engineering officer Julian Carter, who holds a PhD in microelectronics and has more than 35 years’ experience developing medical devices, TidalSense has spent more than a decade building the technology.

Its AI models have been trained on more than 2.5 million recorded breaths to identify the distinctive patterns associated with COPD.

The device was introduced into the NHS last year and is now being used by public health providers in Suffolk, north-east Essex, Wales, Glasgow and community lung screening clinics across the south of England.

Continue Reading

Diagnosis

CEM shows promise for screening high-risk breast cancer patients

Published

on

Contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) has shown promise for women at higher risk of breast cancer, with follow-up screening showing greater specificity and accuracy.

Cancer detection rates remained consistent during repeat screening, while specificity improved compared with baseline examinations.

Specificity shows how accurately a test identifies people who do not have the disease, helping to reduce unnecessary follow-up procedures.

Researchers at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center analysed 6,911 contrast-enhanced mammography screens carried out among 2,756 women between 2015 and 2021.

Contrast-enhanced mammography, or CEM, combines standard mammography with an injected contrast agent that highlights areas of increased blood flow. Cancerous tumours often develop a greater blood supply.

The team compared 1,575 baseline screens with 3,336 incidence screens.

The researchers classified a screen as baseline if the woman had no previous CEM or had not undergone breast MRI in the previous three years.

Incidence screens were follow-up examinations carried out after previous screening.

After adjusting for the number of screens each woman received, the researchers found no statistically significant difference in cancer detection rates between the groups.

However, specificity reached 91.5 per cent during incidence screening, compared with 83.4 per cent for baseline screening.

Overall accuracy was also higher for incidence screening, at 91.4 per cent compared with 83.5 per cent.

“The ability of contrast-enhanced mammography to help detect cancer during prevalence screening in women at increased risk for breast cancer is maintained in subsequent incidence screens, with better specificity and accuracy,” the research team wrote.

Baseline screening detected 19 cancers per 1,000 examinations, compared with 11.6 per 1,000 incidence screens.

Sensitivity, which measures how well a test identifies people who have a disease, was 87.1 per cent for baseline screening and 86.1 per cent for incidence screening.

Contrast enhancement alone helped detect 18 of the 30 cancers found during baseline screening and 36 of the 62 found during incidence screening.

The researchers also identified 14 interval cancers across the examinations, with no evidence of a difference between the two groups.

An interval cancer is diagnosed after a screening result appears normal but before the next scheduled examination.

The retrospective study used previously collected clinical records rather than following participants in a newly designed trial.

The researchers described CEM as a reasonable screening tool for women with dense breasts.

Dense breasts contain more fibrous and glandular tissue, which can make cancer more difficult to detect with standard mammography.

CEM has previously shown greater sensitivity than ultrasound, digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis, according to the article.

Digital breast tomosynthesis takes several low-dose X-ray images from different angles to create a three-dimensional view of breast tissue.

The technique also takes less time and generally costs less than breast MRI, with previous research suggesting its performance is not inferior to MRI.

CEM is currently used for some screening purposes outside its approved indications.

The researchers said it could also help address health inequalities affecting women who face barriers to accessing MRI.

“In addition, women have reported a preference for CEM over MRI,” they wrote.

The researchers said a future article would provide full details about the interval cancers identified in the study.

An accompanying editorial said the technique could become a practical part of breast cancer screening for selected groups, although challenges remain around wider adoption.

“Whether this potential ultimately translates into widespread implementation will depend on future studies evaluating not only diagnostic performance, but also patient outcomes, health care utilisation, and real-world feasibility across diverse practice settings,” wrote Dr Vivianne Aguilera Freitas of the University of Toronto.

Continue Reading

Diagnosis

Experimental treatment significantly slows progression of fatal brain disease in women, study finds

Published

on

Davunetide may significantly slow the progression of a fatal brain disease in women, according to a new analysis of clinical trial data.

The findings indicate that women and men with progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP) may respond differently to the experimental treatment.

Progressive supranuclear palsy, or PSP, is a rare and fatal neurodegenerative disease.

Researchers at Tel Aviv University led the analysis and said the results reinforce the need for sex-specific approaches to neurodegenerative diseases.

Neurodegenerative diseases are conditions in which nerve cells in the brain or nervous system gradually lose function and die.

The team reanalysed data from a 52-week international clinical trial involving more than 300 people with PSP.

The disease is caused by the abnormal accumulation of tau protein in the brain. Tau is a protein found in nerve cells that builds up abnormally in people with PSP.

There is currently no effective drug treatment for the disease.

The work was led by professor Illana Gozes of the Sagol School of Neuroscience and the Gray Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences at Tel Aviv University.

The research team included current and former students Dr Guy Shapira, Jason Blatt and Liri Guz, together with professor Noam Shomron.

The original clinical trial found that Davunetide was safe but ineffective.

However, the researchers separated female and male participants and re-examined the data using updated assessment measures recommended by the FDA.

Women treated with Davunetide experienced a significant slowing of disease progression, while no similar effect was observed in men.

The treatment helped preserve essential movement and functional abilities, including balance, fine motor skills and everyday tasks such as using cutlery, buttoning clothes and washing the face and hands.

Fine motor skills are the small, precise movements needed for tasks involving the fingers and hands.

Treated women also showed significant improvements in language ability, working memory and overall cognitive function.

Cognitive function covers mental abilities such as memory, attention, language and problem-solving.

The analysis also identified profound molecular differences between women and men.

The relationship between levels of pathological tau in cerebrospinal fluid and clinical symptoms was completely reversed between the sexes.

Cerebrospinal fluid is the clear liquid surrounding the brain and spinal cord. A biomarker is a measurable sign that can indicate disease activity.

For example, language abilities declined significantly as tau pathology increased in women, but not in men.

The researchers said this suggests the disease mechanisms may work differently in women and men, potentially explaining their different responses to treatment.

According to professor Gozes, overlooking biological differences between the sexes may hide a genuine treatment effect.

“Our data show that analysing women and men separately is not merely a statistical exercise, but an essential tool for developing more effective treatments for neurodegenerative brain diseases,” she said.

The researchers believe the findings provide a strong scientific basis for future clinical trials and treatment protocols designed from the outset to account for patients’ sex.

These trials could evaluate Davunetide as a targeted treatment for women with PSP.

They said the approach may also pave the way for more precise treatments for tau-related diseases, including Alzheimer’s disease and other neurodegenerative brain disorders.

The study was supported by ExoNavis Therapeutics, which is developing Davunetide for brain diseases under licence from Ramot, Tel Aviv University’s technology transfer company.

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025 Aspect Health Media Ltd. All Rights Reserved.