Connect with us

Diagnosis

Research explores nervous system pathways that heighten endometriosis pain

Published

on

Researchers have secured US$3m to study how brain pain pathways influence endometriosis treatment outcomes, potentially explaining why 25 to 40 per cent of patients do not respond.

The project will use neuroimaging to identify brain signatures that could predict which patients benefit from surgery or hormonal treatment.

USC researchers Jason Kutch and Neda Jahanshad received the National Institutes of Health grant to investigate pain processing patterns in the brain.

The study aims to understand why some patients get lasting relief while others undergo multiple surgeries with limited success.

There is often little correlation between the amount of endometrial tissue and pain levels.

Some patients with extensive lesions report minimal pain, while others with little visible disease experience severe symptoms.

Kutch is an associate professor in the USC Division of Biokinesiology and Physical Therapy

The researcher said: “About 25 to 40 per cent of patients don’t get sustained relief from those interventions.

“That leads many people to undergo multiple surgeries with only limited success.”

The research focuses on central sensitisation, where the nervous system becomes overactive and amplifies pain signals.

This involves complex interactions between biological pain drivers and how the nervous system detects and interprets those signals.

Kutch said: “There’s growing recognition that chronic pain involves a complex interplay between biological pain drivers and how the nervous system detects and interprets those signals.

“One key concept is central sensitisation, where the nervous system becomes overactive and amplifies pain.

“In this project, we’re trying to understand that component better: Can we predict who will respond to surgical or hormonal treatment, and who may not?”

The project builds on Kutch’s 14 years studying pelvic pain conditions, including bladder and prostate pain, where brain markers suggesting central sensitisation have been identified.

Jahanshad, associate professor of neurology and biomedical engineering at the Keck School of Medicine of USC, will harmonise independently collected datasets to explore different aspects of pelvic pain and treatment outcomes.

Jahanshad said: “My team specialises in merging different types of data that were collected independently and finding ways to harmonise them.

“The goal is to see whether there are brain signatures, before treatment, that can help predict who will respond successfully.

“We often see that some patients experience pain relapse after treatment or have coexisting conditions such as depression or anxiety that may influence their pain outcomes.

“We are looking to build a model that can help optimise treatment plans for women with endometriosis.” said

The researchers emphasised this is not about dismissing pain as psychological but understanding biological differences in brain pain processing.

Potential interventions could include non-invasive brain stimulation, which Kutch is currently trialling for interstitial cystitis, a related bladder pain condition.

Centrally acting medicines might also prove more effective if patients likely to benefit can be identified.

Features

Gender gap in treatment persists even when men and women have same condition

Published

on

Women with the same medical conditions as men were less likely to receive the same treatment across several specialties, a global research review found.

The review found differences in care for conditions including cardiovascular disease, kidney disease and Parkinson’s, with women less likely to receive some active treatments.

Of 38 studies analysed, 33 found women were less likely than men to be offered active treatment.

Researchers at the University of St Andrews found women with myocardial infarction, heart failure or an irregular heartbeat were more likely to receive medication, while men were more likely to undergo coronary bypass surgery, stenting or other surgical treatment.

Women were also less likely to be prescribed statins.

Men with Parkinson’s were more likely to be referred for deep brain stimulation.

Men with liver failure were more likely to receive a transplant, while women with kidney disease requiring dialysis were less likely to receive permanent access and spent longer using a catheter.

Women were also less likely to receive opioids for pain management.

The researchers found no significant difference between women and men in treatment for stroke or diabetes, while women were more likely to receive treatment for dementia.

None of the studies identified clinical guidelines recommending different treatment based on sex.

Researchers said this suggested the differences could not be explained by the need for different clinical approaches to women’s health.

Dr Andrew O’Malley, who co-led the study, said: “For clinicians, the findings are a prompt to check whether treatment is being offered on clinical grounds rather than assumption.”

He said studies showed doctors more often attributed women’s symptoms to anxiety and made more diagnostic errors with female patients, even when test results were positive.

Dr Miriam Veenhuizen, honorary lecturer in the School of Medicine at St Andrews, said: “While the direction of the findings was not a surprise, the consistency was. The same pattern appeared in cardiology, surgery, transplant medicine and emergency care, and it survived statistical adjustment in most studies.”

Continue Reading

Diagnosis

Menopause frequently missing from electronic health records – study

Published

on

Menopause is often absent from women’s electronic health records, a study of nearly 396,000 women has found.

Researchers found menopause appeared almost seven times more often in participant surveys than in electronic health records (EHRs).

The findings suggest important reproductive health information, including age at menopause, may often be missing from health records used for research.

Audrey Hendricks, associate professor of bioinformatics at CU Anschutz and the study’s principal investigator, said: “Ultimately, we cannot study what we do not measure. We cannot treat what we do not know.

“Menopause has enormous implications for women’s health, but if we don’t consistently capture when menopause occurs and other important reproductive health information, we limit our ability to understand how this transition affects disease risk and health outcomes.”

Researchers at the University of Colorado Anschutz analysed data from women taking part in the National Institutes of Health’s All of Us Research Program.

They compared menopause information reported by participants in surveys with menopause diagnoses recorded in their electronic health records.

Around 193,000 menopause observations were identified in survey data, compared with approximately 28,000 diagnoses in EHR data.

Menopause was documented in electronic health records for only about 7 per cent of women in the dataset.

Nearly all participants with a menopause diagnosis recorded in their EHR also reported menopause in survey data. However, substantially fewer women had menopause documented in their health records.

Other important information was also frequently unavailable, including age at menopause, which researchers may use when examining links between menopause and chronic disease risk.

Menopause is a physiological transition that can affect cardiometabolic health and many other aspects of women’s health.

Researchers said relatively little is known about how factors including the timing and type of menopause influence health outcomes across diverse populations.

Large-scale programmes such as All of Us combine participant surveys, electronic health records and genomic data, but menopause-related research depends on relevant reproductive health information being available.

Missing menopause information can make it harder to investigate how the transition relates to health and disease.

The findings may also help researchers using All of Us data define menopause-related study populations, design studies and estimate how many participants are needed.

Hendricks said: “We have an enormous opportunity to use large-scale datasets to understand women’s health across the menopause transition and to identify who may be at greater risk for disease.

“But we need to make sure that the information researchers need is actually being collected.

“We must do a better job of capturing women’s health information, including reproductive health and measures related to menopause.”

Researchers said more complete and consistent collection of menopause and reproductive health information could help future studies examine factors such as age at menopause and their relationship with disease risk and health outcomes.

Continue Reading

Diagnosis

FDA approves AstraZeneca breast cancer drug

Published

on

The FDA has granted accelerated approval to AstraZeneca drug Etcamah for certain adults with advanced breast cancer carrying an ESR1 mutation.

Etcamah, also known as camizestrant, was approved in combination with a CDK4/6 inhibitor, either abemaciclib, palbociclib or ribociclib.

The treatment is for adults with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative, locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer when an estrogen receptor-1 (ESR1) mutation is detected during aromatase inhibitor and CDK4/6 inhibitor therapy using an FDA-authorised test.

ESR1 mutations are acquired resistance mutations that tumours may develop during treatment with aromatase inhibitors, a type of endocrine therapy commonly used as a front-line treatment for locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer.

Fewer than 5 per cent of patients have the mutation when HR-positive metastatic breast cancer is diagnosed, according to the FDA. After disease progression on an aromatase inhibitor, nearly 40 per cent have the mutation.

Acting FDA commissioner Kyle Diamantas said: “Women living with metastatic breast cancer face an uphill battle as their tumors continuously evolve to escape treatment.

“We owe them every weapon in our arsenal.

“Today’s approval delivers a win to these patients by granting them a targeted therapy designed specifically to overcome resistance, giving them more time before their disease progresses.”

The accelerated approval programme allows earlier approval of drugs that treat serious conditions and fill an unmet medical need based on surrogate or intermediate endpoints.

For Etcamah, approval was based on how long patients lived without their disease worsening, measured from when the resistance mutation was first detected in their blood.

The FDA said it has not yet been confirmed whether intervening when the mutation is detected, rather than waiting until disease progression is confirmed, results in a clinically meaningful benefit. Confirmatory studies are therefore required to verify and describe clinical benefit.

Angelo de Claro, director of the FDA’s Oncology Center of Excellence, said: “I commend both the FDA and the sponsor for their commitment to advancing cancer care and securing this accelerated approval.

“This marks the first FDA approval of a cancer therapy guided by the detection of a resistance mutation in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) before imaging tests show that the disease is progressing.

“But additional evidence is needed to confirm clinical benefit.”

Circulating tumour DNA, or ctDNA, consists of small pieces of tumour DNA released into the blood and can allow earlier molecular detection of resistance mutations.

The FDA also authorised the Guardant360 CDx assay as a companion diagnostic to identify patients with breast cancer who have ESR1 mutations for treatment with camizestrant.

Efficacy was assessed in a clinical trial comparing a switch to Etcamah plus a CDK4/6 inhibitor with continued treatment using an aromatase inhibitor plus a CDK4/6 inhibitor.

Estimated median progression-free survival was 16 months in the Etcamah group, compared with 9.2 months in the aromatase inhibitor group.

Etcamah’s prescribing information includes a boxed warning about the risk of irregular heart rhythm when taken with certain other medicines. It also includes warnings about an abnormally slow heart rate and potential harm to an unborn baby.

The FDA convened its Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee for the application on 30 April 2026.

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025 Aspect Health Media Ltd. All Rights Reserved.