Connect with us

News

Copper coil vs Mirena: Which is right for you?

Published

on

Article produced in association with Spital Clinic

Both the copper coil and the Mirena are more than 99 per cent effective as contraceptives — but they work in completely different ways, have opposite effects on periods, and suit very different people.

 

With the FSRH’s May 2024 licence extension for the Mirena now in effect, this guide covers the five key differences using up-to-date UK evidence, not the older guidance that many sources still repeat.

How Each Device Works

The FSRH March 2023 guideline set out the terminology now used across UK clinical practice: the copper intrauterine device (Cu-IUD) and the levonorgestrel intrauterine system (LNG-IUD).

The copper coil works by releasing copper ions that are toxic to sperm, preventing fertilisation. It contains no hormones at all, making it a strong option for women who cannot or do not want hormonal contraception.

The Mirena — the most widely prescribed 52mg LNG-IUD in the UK — thickens cervical mucus to block sperm, thins the uterine lining, and may suppress ovulation, though most users continue to ovulate normally.

According to Hull University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, the hormone levels it produces are lower than those from the combined contraceptive pill — relevant for women advised to avoid higher-dose hormonal methods.

The hormone-free nature of the Cu-IUD is its defining advantage for some; the localised hormonal action of the LNG-IUD is its defining advantage for others.

According to NHS guidance on the copper coil, neither device interacts with medicines or herbal remedies, and both can be fitted in women who have never been pregnant.

The way each device works also determines what it does to periods — often the deciding factor.

Effectiveness and Duration

The NHS confirms both devices prevent pregnancy in more than 99 per cent of users. When it comes to contraceptive effectiveness, there is no meaningful difference between them.

Where they differ significantly is duration. The copper coil lasts up to 10 years, and one fitted in a woman aged 40 or over can remain in place until menopause under FSRH March 2023 guidance.

For the Mirena, the picture changed in May 2024: the FSRH CEU statement on extended LNG-IUD use confirmed that all 52mg LNG-IUDs — including the Mirena, Levosert, and Benilexa — are now licensed for eight years of contraceptive use, up from five under previous guidance.

When the Mirena is used as part of HRT, it protects the uterine lining for up to five years before requiring replacement. Smaller-dose devices such as Kyleena (20mcg) are licensed for five years, and Jaydess for three.

Both are long-acting reversible contraceptives — fertility returns immediately after removal, with no delay or washout period. Both are available without a GP referral through the coil insertion and removal service at Spital Clinic.

What Each Device Does to Periods

The most important practical difference is what each device does to periods — and they go in opposite directions.

The copper coil typically makes periods heavier, longer, and more painful; the NHS notes this may ease after a few months, but heavier bleeding is one of the most common reasons for early removal.

Both devices can cause irregular spotting in the first three to six months after fitting.

The Mirena does the opposite.

According to Hull University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, it reduces monthly blood loss by 86 per cent at three months and by 97 per cent at twelve months.

Nine in ten women who use it for heavy periods see a significant reduction; around 20 per cent have no bleeding at all; and 80 per cent report meaningful pain relief.

NHS information on the hormonal coil confirms that periods often become lighter, shorter, and less painful — with many users finding they stop entirely after the initial settling-in period.

For women whose choice of contraception is being shaped by troublesome periods, those statistics make the direction of the decision clear.

For women with already disrupted cycles, it is worth booking a private specialist assessment before deciding — for this group, the choice of coil is as much a treatment decision as a contraceptive one.

Unlike the copper coil, the Mirena is licensed as a first-line treatment for menorrhagia — heavy or prolonged bleeding defined as losing more than 80ml per cycle or periods lasting longer than seven days.

In around half of cases, heavy periods have no identifiable structural cause, making the Mirena’s targeted local action particularly useful: it reduces bleeding at the endometrial level without surgery, general anaesthesia, or high-dose systemic hormones, and offers a non-surgical alternative to procedures such as endometrial ablation.

Side Effects, Risks, and Who Cannot Use Each Device

Both devices carry the same procedural risks. Pelvic infection affects around 1 in 100 women in the first three weeks; expulsion happens in roughly 1 in 20; and uterine perforation occurs in approximately 2 in 1,000 fittings — slightly higher in women breastfeeding within six months of delivery. Ectopic pregnancy, though rare, is a risk if either device fails.

The side-effect profiles diverge beyond those shared risks.

The copper coil carries no hormonal side effects — heavier periods are its main downside. The

Mirena may cause acne, headaches, mood changes, breast tenderness, and ovarian cysts; most resolve without treatment, but they are worth considering for anyone sensitive to progestogen.

The Mirena is also unaffected by vomiting, diarrhoea, or most drug interactions.

Each device has its own contraindications. Neither should be fitted in the presence of an active sexually transmitted infection or unexplained uterine bleeding.

The Mirena is not suitable for women with a history of breast cancer, certain liver conditions, serious cardiovascular disease, or certain uterine abnormalities.

The copper coil, meanwhile, can be used as emergency contraception if fitted within five days of unprotected sex — the only intrauterine option for post-coital protection.

The Fitting Procedure and What to Expect

The fitting procedure is the same for both devices: a 10 to 15 minute clinical appointment, ideally towards the end of a period, though it can happen at any point in the cycle.

The full appointment takes around 30 minutes. Local anaesthetic gel or spray is used to manage discomfort, and the NHS advises taking ibuprofen or paracetamol about an hour beforehand.

No surgery or general anaesthetic is needed. Some cramping and light spotting in the days after fitting is normal and usually settles within a week. Neither device requires you to have had children previously.

Fertility returns immediately after removal of either device — there is no waiting period before trying to conceive.

For most women, the choice between the copper coil and the Mirena comes down to one question: are hormones acceptable or not?

The copper coil suits women who want hormone-free contraception, those who cannot use progestogen, and those who need emergency post-coital protection.

The Mirena suits women who want lighter or absent periods, those managing menorrhagia, and those using it as the progestogen component of HRT.

Both offer equivalent contraceptive effectiveness and full reversibility.

The FSRH’s May 2024 extension of the Mirena’s licence to eight years makes it a stronger long-term option than many comparisons suggest — worth knowing if the information you have found is based on older guidance.

This article is produced for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. Clinical guidance referenced reflects published NHS and FSRH standards as at March 2025. Individual circumstances vary; readers are advised to consult a qualified healthcare professional before acting on any information in this article.

This piece was produced in association with Spital Clinic, which provided background clinical information for editorial purposes. Hyperlinks to external sources are included for reference only and do not represent an endorsement of any product, service or organisation.

Insight

Experimental treatment significantly slows progression of fatal brain disease in women, study finds

Published

on

Davunetide may significantly slow the progression of a fatal brain disease in women, according to a new analysis of clinical trial data.

The findings indicate that women and men with progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP) may respond differently to the experimental treatment.

Progressive supranuclear palsy, or PSP, is a rare and fatal neurodegenerative disease.

Researchers at Tel Aviv University led the analysis and said the results reinforce the need for sex-specific approaches to neurodegenerative diseases.

Neurodegenerative diseases are conditions in which nerve cells in the brain or nervous system gradually lose function and die.

The team reanalysed data from a 52-week international clinical trial involving more than 300 people with PSP.

The disease is caused by the abnormal accumulation of tau protein in the brain. Tau is a protein found in nerve cells that builds up abnormally in people with PSP.

There is currently no effective drug treatment for the disease.

The work was led by professor Illana Gozes of the Sagol School of Neuroscience and the Gray Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences at Tel Aviv University.

The research team included current and former students Dr Guy Shapira, Jason Blatt and Liri Guz, together with professor Noam Shomron.

The original clinical trial found that Davunetide was safe but ineffective.

However, the researchers separated female and male participants and re-examined the data using updated assessment measures recommended by the FDA.

Women treated with Davunetide experienced a significant slowing of disease progression, while no similar effect was observed in men.

The treatment helped preserve essential movement and functional abilities, including balance, fine motor skills and everyday tasks such as using cutlery, buttoning clothes and washing the face and hands.

Fine motor skills are the small, precise movements needed for tasks involving the fingers and hands.

Treated women also showed significant improvements in language ability, working memory and overall cognitive function.

Cognitive function covers mental abilities such as memory, attention, language and problem-solving.

The analysis also identified profound molecular differences between women and men.

The relationship between levels of pathological tau in cerebrospinal fluid and clinical symptoms was completely reversed between the sexes.

Cerebrospinal fluid is the clear liquid surrounding the brain and spinal cord. A biomarker is a measurable sign that can indicate disease activity.

For example, language abilities declined significantly as tau pathology increased in women, but not in men.

The researchers said this suggests the disease mechanisms may work differently in women and men, potentially explaining their different responses to treatment.

According to professor Gozes, overlooking biological differences between the sexes may hide a genuine treatment effect.

“Our data show that analysing women and men separately is not merely a statistical exercise, but an essential tool for developing more effective treatments for neurodegenerative brain diseases,” she said.

The researchers believe the findings provide a strong scientific basis for future clinical trials and treatment protocols designed from the outset to account for patients’ sex.

These trials could evaluate Davunetide as a targeted treatment for women with PSP.

They said the approach may also pave the way for more precise treatments for tau-related diseases, including Alzheimer’s disease and other neurodegenerative brain disorders.

The study was supported by ExoNavis Therapeutics, which is developing Davunetide for brain diseases under licence from Ramot, Tel Aviv University’s technology transfer company.

Continue Reading

Pregnancy

UK research paves way for new preeclampsia therapies

Published

on

A preeclampsia study has found unusual cell activity in mothers and babies that could reveal new targets for treatment.

The condition affects 2 to 4 per cent of pregnancies worldwide and is a leading cause of maternal and foetal mortality.

There is currently no cure, and severe cases can put both the mother and baby at risk.

Scientists from UCL and University College London Hospitals found that stressed placental cells, poorly functioning blood vessels and an overactive immune response all contribute to the condition.

Preeclampsia causes high blood pressure during pregnancy. It can affect blood flow to the baby and cause symptoms such as swelling, headaches, blurred vision and pain under the ribs.

Without treatment, it can damage the mother’s health, slow the baby’s growth and, in severe cases, become life-threatening.

Previous research has focused only on the placenta, the organ that develops during pregnancy to support the baby’s growth, rather than the tissues around it.

The researchers said the findings could reveal new therapeutic targets, which are biological processes that future treatments could be designed to alter.

Senior author professor Sara Hillman, of the UCL EGA Institute for Women’s Health, said: “We studied individual cells from both the mother and the baby to see how their activity changes in healthy pregnancies compared with preeclampsia.

“This helped us to confirm some changes already suspected in the condition and also discover new ones.”

The team studied 20 pregnant women recruited at UCLH, including 10 with severe preeclampsia and 10 without the condition.

They used genomic testing to examine individual cells in the placenta and other tissues where cells from the developing baby and mother come into contact.

Genomic testing examines genetic information to help researchers understand how cells behave and the roles they may play.

The other tissues studied were the myometrium, the muscular layer of the womb, and the chorioamniotic membranes, which surround the baby during pregnancy.

The team compared cells from healthy pregnancies and those affected by preeclampsia at different gestational ages, meaning different stages of pregnancy.

They used technology that can read the genetic information of thousands of individual cells at the same time, allowing them to see what each cell was doing and where it was located in the tissue.

In preeclamptic pregnancies where babies were born prematurely, before 37 weeks, during the third trimester, placental cells showed signs of stress and low oxygen levels.

The cells also did not use energy in the normal way.

Some cells responsible for reshaping the mother’s blood vessels were not working properly, the researchers found, which may affect blood flow to the baby.

There were also signs of an overactive immune response in the placenta, nearby tissues and the mother’s blood.

The researchers said this response, together with other stress molecules released by the placenta, helps explain why preeclampsia affects the whole body and can become serious.

They hope the findings will help researchers find treatments for the condition and potentially save lives.

Co-lead author Dr Yara Sanchez Corrales, of the UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, said: “These findings point to specific biological processes that could be targeted with treatments. Acting early in pregnancy, especially in more severe early-onset cases, could help improve outcomes and reduce the high risks associated with severe preeclampsia.

“We hope that our findings may set us on the path to reducing premature births and fatalities associated with preeclampsia.”

Co-lead author Mr Theodoros Xenakis, of the UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, said: “Future studies may provide an even clearer picture of the biological changes linked to the disease by including more participants and using even more precise methods.”

Continue Reading

News

Planetary Health Diet lowers heart risk in older women, study finds

Published

on

A 20-year study of 66,892 postmenopausal women linked the Planetary Health Diet to lower cardiovascular disease risk.

Women whose eating habits most closely followed the diet had around a 28 per cent lower risk of cardiovascular disease than those in the lowest-adherence group.

Even moderate adherence to the diet was linked with a lower risk.

Donya Shahamati is a doctoral student in public health at the University of California, Irvine.

The researcher said: “Our results suggest that people may not need to follow a perfect or very restrictive diet to see potential heart-health benefits.

“This is especially important for postmenopausal women, because cardiovascular risk increases with age and tends to rise after menopause.”

The diet emphasises fruit, vegetables, whole grains, legumes, nuts and unsaturated fats, while limiting red and processed meats, added sugars, refined grains and saturated fats.

Postmenopausal women are those who have gone through menopause, when periods stop and hormone levels change.

Cardiovascular risk tends to increase with age and rise after menopause.

“Moving towards a more plant-forward, higher-quality diet can be accomplished through small, realistic changes,” said Shahamati.

“These changes might include filling half the plate with vegetables more often; using avocado or olive oil in place of butter; choosing oatmeal or whole-grain cereal for breakfast; or trying a meatless meal once per week.”

For the research, investigators followed 66,892 participants in the Women’s Health Initiative, a long-term national health study funded by the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute at the National Institutes of Health.

All the women included in the analysis were free from cardiovascular disease at the start of the study, between 1994 and 1998, and had complete information about their diet and other important health and lifestyle factors.

Researchers used information collected through a food frequency questionnaire at the start of the study to calculate a Planetary Health Diet Index score for each participant. Higher scores indicated that a participant’s diet was more closely aligned with the Planetary Health Diet.

They then divided the women into five groups according to how closely their diets followed it.

The women were around 63 years old at the start of the study and were followed for about 20 years to see who developed cardiovascular disease.

When analysing the data, researchers adjusted for factors that could affect cardiovascular risk, including age, race and ethnicity, education, income, smoking, alcohol intake, physical activity, body mass index and total calorie intake.

“We did not only look at overall cardiovascular disease,” said Shahamati.

“We also looked separately at coronary heart disease, stroke and heart failure. This helped us see whether the pattern was similar across different types of cardiovascular outcomes.”

Overall, women whose diets were most closely aligned with the Planetary Health Diet had the lowest risk of cardiovascular disease.

They also had a lower risk of coronary heart disease, heart failure and stroke than women in the lowest-adherence group.

Moderate adherence was also associated with a lower risk, with each 10-point increase in the Planetary Health Diet Index score linked to a further reduction.

The researchers cautioned that, because the study was observational, it could not show that the diet directly caused the lower risk among women.

Observational studies identify links between factors such as diet and disease risk, but cannot prove that one caused the other.

The research team is now exploring other aspects of diet and health among older adults, including how diet quality changes over time.

The researchers said this information could help support healthy ageing and prevent chronic diseases.

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025 Aspect Health Media Ltd. All Rights Reserved.