Connect with us

News

Femtech start-up launches virtual period pain clinic

The platform aims to help patients understand and manage their menstrual symptoms

Published

on

Valentina Milanova, founder and CPO at Daye

The UK gynaecological health start-up Daye has launched a virtual period pain clinic to help women and assigned female at birth individuals identify the root cause of their period pain and manage symptoms.

Daye advocates menstrual pain is a profound health concern and that chronic pain sufferers need attention, support, and faster access to effective medical interventions.

In collaboration with NHS GPs, gynaecologists and chronic pelvic pain specialists, the female-founded startup has developed the new service called Period Pain Clinic (PPC) to help women understand and easily manage their period pain.

Nine in 10 women have suffered with period pain, and according to research from University College London (UCL), period pain can be as painful as having a heart attack.

Despite this, many of these women suffer in silence, with 57 per cent saying period pains have impacted their ability to work.

To provide a faster diagnosis of the root cause of people’s period pain, Daye’s new service conducts an assessment of a patient’s symptoms and providing private consultations with a range of specialists, including sexual health nurses, gynaecologists, pelvic pain and fertility specialists, nutritionists, dermatologists, breathwork coaches, acupuncturists.

The Period Pain Clinic aims to provide patients with a personalised period pain management plan, which combines holistic and pharmaceutical treatments, as well as easy to follow lifestyle modifications.

The platform, Daye says, also aims to address other connected symptoms such as infertility, hair loss, obesity, and severe acne and recommend interventions such as prescribed CBD tampons, TENS machines, pelvic floor trainers, acupuncture and hormonal contraception.

“This launch marks an important milestone in advancing the way we diagnose and treat gynaecological health conditions and a significant step towards not only redefining the narrative surrounding periods but also empowering millions of women and AFAB individuals to better understand, manage, and challenge the status quo surrounding their monthly pain,” said Valentina Milanova, founder of Daye.

“Like so many others, I’ve faced the dismissal of my period pain by medical professionals. My own experiences with ovarian cysts and the resultant pain were dismissed time and again. This led me to accept debilitating period pain as an unchangeable reality of my life.

“This should not be the case. Nobody’s menstrual pain should be dismissed, which is why we launched our Period Pain Clinic to ensure that nobody has to suffer in silence or be in the dark about the cause or management of their menstrual pain.”

A survey carried out by Daye found 50.7 per cent of women do not understand the causes of their menstrual pain while research shows that for chronic period pain sufferers and people with associated conditions such as endometriosis, adenomyosis, PCOS, and fibroids, the average time to be diagnosed is seven and a half years, leaving many individuals feeling like they are being ignored or disregarded by healthcare professionals.

Left undiagnosed and untreated, these conditions can cause complications, including increased difficulty getting pregnant and an increased risk of miscarriage.

Dr Melanie Bone, an obstetrician-gynaecologist (OB-GYN), said: “Women and AFAB individuals can go years without seeking a cause for their period pain, accepting it as an inevitable feature of their monthly cycle. Yet period pain can be caused by a number of serious conditions, such as endometriosis and PCOS, which can cause additional complications further down the line if left untreated.

“The launch of Daye’s Period Pain Clinic should help women to understand that period pain does not have to be an agonising fact of life. By understanding the causes, women will be able to get the help required to better manage their pain and drastically improve their quality of life.”

Pregnancy

Pregnant women told to avoid runny eggs amid salmonella outbreak

Published

on

Pregnant women are being advised to avoid runny or under-cooked eggs when eating out amid a developing salmonella outbreak.

The advice also applies to freshly made products that may contain uncooked eggs, including mayonnaise, soufflé and hollandaise sauce.

The FSA said well-cooked eggs served in restaurants, cafés and takeaways remain safe to eat.

The warning follows the UK Health Security Agency declaring a national outbreak of salmonella food poisoning after one person died and hundreds more fell ill.

Imported eggs or dishes containing them are thought to be behind the outbreak.

FSA chief scientific adviser Ian Young said: “If people are eating out or consuming eggs or egg-containing products from cafes and restaurants then for those people in particular who are young, elderly, pregnant or vulnerable, it’s important to make sure that any eggs or egg products that you consume in those settings have been very well cooked.”

He described the outbreak as “unusually large and rapidly increasing”, adding that “people need to be careful”.

The FSA said British eggs bought from supermarkets are not linked to the current outbreak because chickens bred in the UK are vaccinated against common strains of salmonella.

“There is no link to those eggs to this current outbreak,” Young said.

Mark Williams, chief executive of the British Egg Industry Council, said British eggs were safe to eat when runny, including for vulnerable people, and were widely available in restaurants and cafés.

“Customers who want to enjoy a runny egg should simply ask whether British Lion eggs are being used,” he said.

More than 200 cases in the UK have been linked to the outbreak, with the majority across England.

Genetic testing suggests the infections are part of the same outbreak and show similarities with previous outbreaks involving imported eggs.

Investigations into individual cases also suggest the eateries involved were buying eggs from abroad.

Salmonella are a family of bacteria that typically live harmlessly in the digestive systems of animals including cattle, pigs and chickens, which is why eggs and poultry are among foods commonly associated with infection.

People can become infected by eating contaminated food that has not been properly cooked, through cross-contamination between raw and cooked food or by coming into contact with infected animals.

Symptoms can include stomach cramps, diarrhoea, vomiting and fever.

Most people recover without further treatment, but older people, babies and people with weakened immune systems are at greatest risk of severe illness.

Hospital treatment with fluids and, in some cases, antibiotics may be needed for severe infections.

People who are concerned are being advised to contact their GP or out-of-hours service in the first instance.

Continue Reading

Insight

Study to tackle years-long delays in endometriosis diagnosis

Published

on

A study is examining where delays occur in diagnosing endometriosis  – a condition that can take seven to twelve years to diagnose.

Endometriosis affects an estimated 1.5 million women and people in the UK, but there is currently no consistent way of measuring where and why diagnostic delays happen.

The research aims to develop the first standardised framework for understanding the diagnostic journey and identifying points where interventions could improve care.

The international project involves researchers from the University of Sheffield, University of Liverpool, University of Oxford, Aarhus University in Denmark and the University of Edinburgh, alongside Endometriosis UK.

Dr Rebecca Mawson, NIHR clinical lecturer in primary care at the University of Sheffield, is part of the research team.

She said: “Our project asks: where exactly are people getting lost or let down on their journey to diagnosis, and how can we map those points in a systematic way to identify where interventions could make a real difference.”

The project is led by Dr Babu Karavadra, NIHR academic clinical fellow in general practice at the University of Liverpool, who has been awarded a World Endometriosis Society Early Career Investigator Award as lead principal investigator at the University of Liverpool.

Researchers will review existing evidence, gather experiences from people living with endometriosis and bring together an international panel to map the diagnostic pathway and agree common definitions for key points along the journey.

The work will focus particularly on people whose experiences are often missing from research, including Black women, people living in rural or deprived areas, LGBTQ+ communities and disabled people.

Primary care will also be central to the research because it is often where people first seek help with symptoms.

Mawson said: “Primary care needs to be at the heart of this work. Primary care is often where people first seek help with their symptoms, so it has a crucial role in understanding diagnostic delay.

“If we only look at what happens once someone reaches specialist gynaecology, we risk missing some of the barriers that shape the journey long before that point.”

Unlike cancer research, where internationally recognised standards exist for studying diagnostic delays, endometriosis research has been more fragmented, with studies measuring different parts of the diagnostic journey in different ways.

The researchers hope to create an ‘Endometriosis Diagnostic Pathway Framework’ to help identify where people are falling through the gaps and where healthcare could be improved.

They will also develop a ‘Snakes and Ladders’ style visual representation showing how systemic barriers, chance and individual experiences can influence whether someone reaches a diagnosis.

The project forms part of the PEARL network, Primary care Endometriosis and Adenomyosis Research and Learning, an international collaboration of primary care and community researchers and clinicians.

Mawson said: “Endometriosis diagnostic delay isn’t inevitable. If we can understand where and why people are experiencing barriers, we have a much better chance of designing interventions that actually make a difference.

“The scale of the problem demands that we look at the whole journey, listen to the people experiencing it and build an evidence base that can lead to real change.”

The framework could provide the foundations for future research, clinical guideline development, healthcare professional training and NHS service improvements, with potential applications to related conditions such as adenomyosis and chronic pelvic pain.

Continue Reading

Insight

Drug turns off ‘master switch’ in aggressive breast cancer

Published

on

A drug targeting a key regulator in triple-negative breast cancer reduced tumour growth and cancer stem cell viability in laboratory models.

Triple-negative breast cancer is an aggressive subtype that disproportionately affects women under 40 and accounts for about 15 to 20 per cent of breast cancers.

The disease lacks receptors for oestrogen, progesterone and the HER2 protein, which are targeted by several cancer drugs, making it particularly difficult to treat.

Researchers from the National University of Singapore’s Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine investigated mechanisms that allow triple-negative breast cancer cells to spread and resist treatment.

They examined regulators of Wnt signalling, a pathway involved in processes including cell growth and movement, and identified a master regulator called DP103.

DP103 is a gene that controls a major biological process. The researchers found it creates a cycle in which cancer cells continue to grow and spread while resisting treatment and maintaining cancer stem cells linked to disease recurrence.

The team then investigated whether a targeted drug known as Supinoxin, or RX-5902, could block DP103 and its effects in triple-negative breast cancer.

Analysis of 21 samples, including patient tumour tissue, laboratory-grown breast cancer cells and organoids derived from local cancer patients, found that the drug reduced cancer stem cell viability by 40 to 60 per cent.

Tumour growth in laboratory-grown tumour models fell by about 50 per cent.

In laboratory models, treatment also reduced tumour size by around 90 per cent while largely sparing healthy cells.

It also extended survival, with half of the treated laboratory models reaching 70 days and beyond, compared with none in the untreated group.

DP103 had previously been identified as a biomarker for triple-negative breast cancer by a team led by Alan Prem Kumar, an assistant professor with the NUS Centre for Cancer Research and principal investigator for the new study.

RX-5902 is already being studied as a treatment for breast cancer, and Kumar said the findings could help identify patients who may be more likely to benefit.

“Our findings suggest that DP103 could potentially serve as a diagnostic biomarker to identify the patients most likely to benefit from RX-5902 treatment, paving the way for a more precise, personalised approach to treating triple-negative breast cancer,” he said.

“Instead of treating all patients the same, future clinical trials could focus on those whose tumours have high levels of DP103, where the therapy is expected to have the greatest impact,” said Kumar.

First author Cai Wanpei said RX-5902 could prevent beta-catenin, a protein whose mutation is associated with various cancers, from entering the nucleus of human cells and switching off genes that drive cancer growth and spread.

“This slows tumour progression and triggers apoptosis – the natural death of cancer cells,” said Cai, who was a PhD student at the NUS Centre for Cancer Research and NUS Medicine’s pharmacology department during the research.

Study co-author Celestial T. Yap said triple-negative breast cancer remains particularly difficult to treat because conventional treatments such as surgery, chemotherapy and immunotherapy may not work for all patients.

She said DP103 could represent a “biological vulnerability” in the disease.

“This discovery offers new insights that could support more precise patient selection and open the door to better targeted strategies for durable disease control and improved clinical outcomes,” said Yap, an associate professor with the NUS Centre for Cancer Research and NUS Medicine’s physiology department.

The researchers said abnormal Wnt signalling also drives several other cancers, meaning the findings could offer avenues for treating other aggressive cancers.

Their next steps include validating DP103 as a predictive biomarker in larger patient groups and further developing therapies targeting the regulator for clinical testing.

The team will also investigate combining RX-5902 with existing therapies to further improve treatment outcomes.

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025 Aspect Health Media Ltd. All Rights Reserved.