Opinion
The science behind the scar: What’s really in our period products

By Ruby Raut, founder and CEO, WUKA
Over the past year, headlines about “toxic period products” have been hard to ignore. Stories about PFAS, heavy metals, and hormone disruptors in pads, tampons, and underwear have sparked global concern, and for good reason. But behind the fear, there’s a scientific story worth understanding.
At the recent House of Lords event, “Have We Reached the Tipping Point for Toxic Period Products?”, researchers and policymakers came together to separate fact from panic. The truth is more nuanced: yes, chemicals and metals are present in some menstrual products, but understanding how much, where they come from, and what that means for our health is key to driving change that’s informed, not sensational.
What Scientists Have Found So Far
Dr Kathrin Schilling, an environmental health scientist at Columbia University, shared new research that tested 16 metals in menstrual products, including arsenic, cadmium, lead, and antimony, all known toxic substances linked to long-term health effects such as cardiovascular disease, kidney problems, and hormonal disruption.
The findings were striking:
- Non-organic products showed higher levels of lead and cadmium than organic ones.
- Some reusable and single-use products exceeded 30,000 nanograms per gram (ng/g) of antimony, a toxic metal commonly used in plastics manufacturing.
- Lead levels varied dramatically, some products contained 100× more than others.
To put this in perspective, even very small doses of lead can cause harm. The World Health Organization confirms there is no safe level of lead exposure. Chronic, low-level contact can gradually affect the nervous system and fertility. The same applies to arsenic, where countries have tightened drinking water limits from 10 µg/L to as low as 1 µg/L after learning that long-term exposure causes disease.
So while the numbers in menstrual products might sound tiny, what matters most is frequency and route of exposure. Menstrual products are used regularly and in contact with one of the body’s most absorbent tissues — the vaginal wall — where absorption is estimated to be 10–80× higher than through skin. Over decades of use, even low concentrations can add up.
Understanding PFAS — The “Forever Chemicals”
Alongside metals, PFAS (per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances) have become another major concern. These synthetic compounds are used for absorbency and stain resistance — but they don’t break down easily, earning the name “forever chemicals.”
They accumulate in soil, water, and the human body, and have been linked to reproductive issues, thyroid disease, and immune dysfunction. California recently became the first state to ban PFAS in menstrual products, while New York is pushing for broader restrictions that include heavy metals and hormone disruptors.
These international shifts signal a clear message: the world is moving towards stricter, transparency-first regulation — something the UK could soon follow.
Why It Matters for Our Bodies
It’s important to remember that our world is already filled with background exposure, from air pollution, processed food, and household plastics. We all live in a chemically complex environment. The key isn’t to fear every product but to understand which exposures matter most and how to minimise them.
Menstrual products are unique because of their intimate and repeated contact with the body. Even trace chemicals can bypass the body’s natural detox systems when absorbed vaginally. This doesn’t mean every product is dangerous, but it underscores why regular, independent testing and clear ingredient disclosure are essential.
Internal vs. External Exposure: Why It Makes a Difference
One of the least understood parts of this debate is the difference between internal and external products. A pad or period underwear sits on the skin; it can only transfer chemicals through surface contact. But products like tampons or menstrual cups are inserted directly into the vagina, an environment that absorbs substances 10–80 times more efficiently than normal skin.
That’s because the vaginal wall is highly vascular, full of small blood vessels, and it bypasses the liver, the organ that usually filters and detoxifies harmful substances. So when a chemical is absorbed vaginally, it goes straight into the bloodstream.
Yet, most testing and regulation still treat all menstrual products as if exposure happens through skin contact. There’s very little research separating the risk profiles of internal (tampons, cups, discs) versus external (pads, underwear) products. That’s why scientists like Dr Schilling emphasised the need for new safety standards that actually reflect how the body interacts with these materials, not just how a fabric performs in a laboratory test.
How Responsible Brands Are Responding
Some brands are already ahead of regulation.
At WUKA, we take this responsibility seriously. We are one of the very few period underwear brands with no PFAS detected in our products. Every batch is tested rigorously, both at source (in China) and again in the UK by Eurofins laboratories, an independent global testing agency.
We also screen for toxic chemicals, metals, and harmful finishes, ensuring that what touches your body is as safe as it is sustainable. As a founder, I always remind our team: I use our products myself. If I wouldn’t wear it, I wouldn’t make it for anyone else.
Our philosophy is simple, transparency builds trust. Consumers shouldn’t need a chemistry degree to choose a safe period product.
The Path Ahead
The science is clear: menstrual product safety deserves the same rigour as drinking water, cosmetics, or food. But we can also take heart, awareness is growing, data is expanding, and governments are beginning to act.
As policymakers push for international standards (through bodies like the ISO TC338 on menstrual products), and as responsible brands lead by example, the future of menstrual care looks safer, smarter, and far more transparent than the past.
This isn’t just about fear of toxins, it’s about empowering everyone who menstruates with knowledge and choice. Because understanding the science is the first step toward changing it.
Find out more about WUKA at wuka.co.uk
Opinion
Why health AI needs to read between the lines

Sahar Abid is a Science Associate at Ema EQ, where she works on cultural sensitivity and bias in AI.
A woman asks an AI health assistant about postpartum depression.
She mentions that her in-laws are telling her to “push through” and skip medical help, even as her symptoms get harder to manage. She never says where she is from or names her background.
The assistant describes the condition and gives her a hotline number. It sounds correct, but it misses what she needs.
That gap is more common than the industry admits, and it points to a blind spot in how we test health AI for bias.
Most bias testing looks at what people explicitly say.
The typical way to check an AI for bias is to label a prompt with someone’s demographic details and see if the answer changes. That catches some problems but misses a bigger one.
Most people do not lead with their identity. They lead with their situation. The woman above told the assistant everything it needed to help her, just not in the form of a label.
Her real question was not only “what is postpartum depression?” It was “how do I get care when the people around me don’t want me to?
When family members hold sway over health decisions, and in many communities they do, advice that asks someone to overrule their family is not something they can act on.
The AI didn’t say anything factually wrong. It answered a different question than the one she was living.
We call this culturally implicit bias, meaning the AI misses the cultural context a situation implies rather than the context a person spells out.
When systems are trained to notice only the explicit cues, they fall back on a default answer built for the majority. For everyone else, the response can feel generic, off-target, or discouraging enough that they stop looking for help.
In health, that is not small. The people most likely to be missed are often the ones the system already underserves.
What we set out to test.
At Ema, we wanted to know how well AI picks up on cultural context that is implied but never stated. So we built our own way to test for it, across a range of communities and real situations like postpartum depression and fertility, using questions that carried cultural meaning without announcing it.
The patterns were consistent. Models often missed the meaning underneath the question. They dropped the specific details a person did share and smoothed them into something generic.
And even when they pointed toward real care, they tended to offer one option instead of choices that might actually fit a person’s life. Any one of those can be the difference between someone following the advice and walking away from care.
Why this matters for anyone building health AI.
Getting this right is the right thing to do, and it also works better.
When an answer reflects a person’s real context, people trust and act on the recommendations more, so they get the help and support they need.
Testing for it is harder than the shortcut most teams use. Swapping a name or a demographic label in and out is easy. Checking whether a model actually understands the human context around a question takes more care.
The shortcut teaches models to perform cultural competence instead of practicing it. No matter how much or how little someone chooses to share, they deserve an answer that is warm, complete, and usable.
A better question.
The bar for equitable health AI should be “does it serve someone who never told you who they are?” It is the harder test, but it determines whether real people get help.
The work of getting there is far from finished, and it is exactly what we are building toward at Ema.
Sources: Naidoo, V., & Chadha, K. K. (2025), Culturally responsive AI chatbots: from framework to field evidence, Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans. Souligne, N., & Subbian, V. (2026), FairLogue: A toolkit for intersectional fairness analysis in clinical machine learning models.
Opinion
anna perimenopause app launches across 39 markets

A perimenopause app that maps existing smartwatch data to the menopausal transition has launched across 39 markets in the UK and Europe.
anna app uses information already recorded by wearables, including sleep, heart rate and body temperature, and returns one suggested lifestyle action each morning alongside the research behind it.
The company says each rule in its library links a defined pattern in a woman’s own data to a specific action. The recommendations were developed with an advising clinician and draw on more than 300 published studies.

The company says recommendations are not generated automatically and each can be traced to research reviewed by a doctor.
The app was built by two women in Riga, has been funded without outside investment and was tested with women in the UK over three months before launch.
Perimenopause is the period of hormonal change before periods stop and usually begins after 40.
The company says one of the challenges is the unpredictability of the transition, with sleep, energy, mood and concentration potentially changing from week to week.
Because the experience varies between women, the developers say it can be difficult to find care tailored to individual needs. After 45, there is also no reliable blood test to confirm perimenopause.
The transition can coincide with a busy period in women’s working lives.
CIPD research published in 2023 found that 27 per cent of working women aged 40 to 60 with menopause symptoms said they had affected their career progression, equivalent to around 1.2m women in the UK.
Some 79 per cent said they felt less able to concentrate.
The long-running Study of Women’s Health Across the Nation, which has followed thousands of women through the menopausal transition, found that cognitive difficulties reported during perimenopause appear to be time-limited, with improvement returning in early postmenopause.
The developers say anna differs from standard wearable data by interpreting measurements specifically in the context of perimenopause.
A smartwatch may show changes in sleep, heart rate or temperature, but anna is designed to look at combinations of those signals and link them to lifestyle guidance for that day.
The app is also designed to work without daily symptom logging.
Users can complete an optional daily check-in if they want to add more context, but the app can operate without a symptom diary or daily manual entries.
It uses information from a compatible device the user already owns, such as a watch, ring or band.
Elina Pika-Lepere, co-founder and chief executive of anna app, said: “Perimenopause arrives exactly when a woman has the least spare capacity. She is often at the peak of her career, raising children, caring for ageing parents. What she has lost is not information, it is predictability.
“We built anna to offer a helping hand and evidence-based guidance through a stage that is difficult but temporary.”
The company gave the example of a morning when a user’s watch shows she has slept well below her own 28-day average.
Rather than simply telling her she is tired, anna may suggest choosing one priority and working on it in 25-minute blocks with a short break between them.
The app also displays the sleep and concentration research used for the recommendation.
anna was founded by Pika-Lepere, who spent 15 years building products in advertising, retail and e-commerce, and product lead Zanda Freimane, whose background is in product management in fintech and e-commerce.
The wider team includes a mathematician and university researcher advising on data architecture, a senior developer and a user experience adviser from a Baltic unicorn company.
anna app is not a medical device and does not provide medical advice.
Its guidance is limited to lifestyle support, and the company describes the app as a tool to complement a doctor rather than replace professional medical care.
anna app is available on iOS across 39 markets in the UK and Europe and is listed on the App Store as anna: Perimenopause & Sleep.
The app is in English and works with Apple Watch, Garmin, Fitbit, Oura and Whoop through Apple Health.
The company says user data is hosted in the EU and is never sold.
The service costs £13.99 a month or £99.99 a year in the UK and €14.99 a month or €99.99 a year in the euro area after a seven-day free trial.
Opinion
Should men be talking about periods? Absolutely. Here is what every man should know

By Ruby Raut, founder, WUKA
Every time we post a dad talking to his daughter about periods, the internet seems to split in two.
One side says: “This is brilliant. I wish my dad had spoken to me like this.”
The other says: “Why on earth are men talking about periods?”

And I always find that second reaction fascinating.
- Because men might not menstruate, but they live in a world with people who do.
- Your daughter might get her first period while you are the only parent at home.
- Your teenage niece might bleed through her clothes while you are driving her somewhere.
- Your girlfriend might wake up at 3am with cramps.
- Your wife might suddenly realise she has run out of period products.
- A colleague might bleed through her trousers during a meeting.
- A girl you coach might quietly tell you she cannot play because she has started her period.
At some point in your life, there is a very good chance a woman or girl will have a period around you.
And at that moment, you have two options. You can be calm, informed and useful. Or you can stand there looking as if nobody ever taught you what a period actually involves.
So perhaps we need a Haynes manual for men and periods. Not a biology degree or a lecture.Just the information every man should probably know.
First: yes, men should know what a period actually is
Let us start with the basics. A period is not simply “a bit of blood once a month”.
Menstruation is part of the menstrual cycle. The lining of the uterus builds up and, if there is no pregnancy, that lining is shed.
That is the bleeding part. But for many women and girls, the experience can also involve cramps, back pain, headaches, bloating, tiredness, diarrhoea, tender breasts, mood changes and generally feeling pretty rotten.
Some barely notice their period. Others are completely floored by it. This is important because one of the least helpful things you can say to somebody struggling with their period is:
“Is it really that bad?”
You do not need to experience period pain to believe someone when they tell you they are in pain.
Second: if a girl tells you she has started her period, do not panic
This one is particularly important for dads.
Imagine your daughter gets her first period while Mum is out. What does she need from you? Probably not a horrified expression or you shouting across the house, “YOUR PERIOD HAS STARTED!”
She needs you to behave as though this is an entirely normal bodily function.
Because it is. Ask her what she needs. Find her a period product. If there is blood on her clothes, help her sort it out without making a huge fuss. If she does not know how to use a pad or period underwear, help her find clear instructions.
And please do not make jokes about her “becoming a woman”.
For a young girl, a first period can already feel confusing, embarrassing and frightening. Your job is not to make it into a ceremony but to make her feel safe. Sometimes the most useful sentence a dad can say is simply:
“Okay. No problem. What do you need?”
Third: learn what period products actually are
Pads.Tampons.Period underwear.Menstrual cups.Period swimwear. You do not have to develop strong opinions about all of them. You just need to know they exist.
If someone asks you to buy pads, do not behave as though you have been sent into a nuclear reactor without protective clothing.
Go to the period aisle. Text them a photo if you are unsure. Ask which absorbency they want. Buy the product. Come home.
And if you are the father of a daughter, having a few period products in the bathroom before she starts menstruating is a very sensible idea.
You keep toilet roll in your house before somebody needs it. Period products should not feel radically different.
Fourth: never announce a period stain
This should be basic human etiquette.
If you notice that a woman or girl has bled through her clothes, tell her quietly and discreetly.
Do not point, laugh, or whisper about it to someone else. And definitely never announce it to the room.
If you have a jumper or jacket she can tie around her waist, offer it. If there is somewhere she can clean up or change, help her get there. Then move on with your life.
Period leaks happen. The embarrassment surrounding them is often far worse than the actual blood.
Fifth: stop using periods as an explanation for every emotion
“Are you on your period?”
Four words capable of making almost any disagreement significantly worse.
Sometimes a woman is angry because she is angry and sometimes she disagrees with you because she disagrees with you. Sometimes you genuinely are being annoying.
Hormonal changes can affect mood for some people, but using menstruation to dismiss a woman’s feelings is patronising and incredibly unhelpful.
If your partner says she feels emotional before her period, listen to her. That does not permit you to diagnose every future disagreement as PMS.
Sixth: period pain is not something every woman should simply put up with
There is an extraordinary tendency to tell girls from a young age that painful periods are just part of being female. For some, mild cramps are manageable.
For others, period pain can be severe enough to disrupt school, work, sleep, exercise and everyday life. So if your daughter is doubled over in pain every month, repeatedly missing school, fainting, vomiting or unable to function normally, do not tell her to toughen up.
Take her seriously and help her seek medical advice.
Being a supportive dad does not require you to know what is causing her symptoms. It requires you to believe her when she says something is wrong.
Seventh: men talking about periods does not take anything away from women
This is perhaps the strangest objection to our Dads and Periods campaign. The idea that periods somehow belong in a conversation that only women are allowed to have.
Women should absolutely lead conversations about their own bodies and experiences. But understanding periods should not be restricted to people who menstruate.
We teach children about digestion even though they are not gastroenterologists and about first aid even though most people are not doctors.
We teach boys about pregnancy even though they will never be pregnant. Knowledge is not ownership. A father understanding periods does not make periods less female. It makes him a better prepared father.
A boy understanding periods does not mean he suddenly understands exactly what menstruation feels like. It means he is less likely to laugh when a girl gets a stain on her skirt.
A male coach understanding periods does not make him an expert on women’s bodies.
It means a teenage player might feel able to tell him why she needs five minutes off the pitch instead of inventing an excuse.
A male partner understanding periods does not mean he has to track every detail of his girlfriend’s cycle. It might simply mean that when she says, “My cramps are awful today,” his response is not, “Again?”
So should men talk about periods?
Yes.
But perhaps “talk” is not even the most important word.
Men should know about periods. Men should be comfortable hearing about periods. Men should know what to do when someone starts one unexpectedly. Men should know how to buy period products. Men should know not to make somebody feel ashamed about bleeding.
And fathers, in particular, should be able to talk about periods with their daughters without embarrassment.
Because there is a bigger point here. Girls learn very quickly which subjects make adults uncomfortable.
If Dad goes silent every time periods are mentioned, she notices. If he leaves every period conversation to Mum, she notices. If he wrinkles his nose at period products, she notices. And she may quietly absorb the message that this part of her body is something men find disgusting or embarrassing.
That is exactly the message we should be trying to dismantle.
At WUKA, we started our Dads and Periods campaign because we want fathers to feel capable of having these conversations.
Not perfectly. Not scientifically. Not with a PowerPoint presentation about the uterus over Sunday lunch. Just normally. Periods happen.
Roughly half the population will experience them at some point in their lives. The other half should probably know what they are.
And if the choice is between a dad who knows what a period is, knows where the period products are kept and can calmly help his daughter when she needs him, or a dad hovering helplessly outside the bathroom shouting, “SHALL I CALL YOUR MUM?”
I know which one I would rather have.
Learn more about WUKA at wuka.co.uk
Entrepreneur1 week agoKOVE Medical raises €1.7 million to improve safety of foetal surgery
Pregnancy2 weeks agoUK study aims to transform maternity care for high-risk pregnancies
Fertility2 days agoParacetamol use may impact future fertility, studies suggest
Entrepreneur5 days agoLast chance to save on Women’s Health Week and Women’s Sport Summit: Early Bird pricing ends 11 September
Menopause1 week agoMenopause hormone treatment may ease brain fog, study suggests
Menopause4 days agoCancer drug could tackle osteoporosis menopause weight gain
News2 weeks agoSpanish agency criticised for menopause guidelines based on male studies
Fertility2 weeks agoNHS IVF access review launched in Scotland










2 Comments