Opinion
The future is female: Why AI must centre women’s health
By Lynda Wilkes-Green, Founder of Ahlya
As artificial intelligence becomes more deeply embedded in healthcare, we’re standing at a pivotal crossroads where we can either continue to build technology that reflects historic gender bias or we can consciously design a future that recognises and responds to the realities of women’s health.
For too long, women have been underrepresented in the data that informs medical decisions.
From clinical trials that favoured male participants to doctors who dismiss women’s symptoms as “normal,” the result is a persistent gender data gap that skews diagnostics, treatments, and outcomes, and too often leaves women without answers.
This is not just a statistical oversight, it’s a systemic issue with very real consequences.
The Invisible Woman in Health Data
Historically, women’s health has been treated as a niche concern.
Until 1993, women were routinely excluded from clinical trials in the US – a policy only formally changed by the National Institutes of Health Revitalization Act, which mandated the inclusion of women and minorities in all NIH-funded research.
Even now, many medical studies do not analyse results by sex, and women living with complex or misunderstood conditions like endometriosis, PMDD, and PCOS continue to face misdiagnoses, delayed care, and medical gaslighting.
AI promises to personalise healthcare like never before, but it is only as inclusive as the data it’s trained on. If we’re not actively collecting and centring female data, we risk building a new wave of tools that repeat old mistakes, but this time, at scale.
The Rise of Generative AI in Wellness
In the past year, we’ve seen a surge in generative AI being applied to wellness, from mental health chatbots to cycle tracking apps.
These tools offer speed, scalability, and hyper-personalised insight; but without gender-aware design and development, they also risk simplifying or misrepresenting female physiology.
Take menstrual health, for example, many apps still reduce the cycle to a calendar or ovulation predictor, ignoring the nuanced interplay of hormones that affect everything from mood and energy to sleep and appetite.
For women with irregular or anovulatory cycles, which are common with conditions like PCOS, these tools often fall short or deliver inaccurate recommendations.
We need a new standard.
We need to develop AI that is aware of hormonal complexity and designed to support wellbeing across the entire cycle, not just fertility, and move beyond prediction models towards dynamic, lived-data insights.
Designing with Hormones in Mind
Centering women’s health in AI is not just about fairness; it’s about effectiveness.
Hormones influence nearly every system in the body, from brain function to metabolism, yet they are rarely accounted for in mainstream health tech.

Lynda Wilkes-Green
By integrating cycle data with daily mood, symptom, and behaviour tracking, we can begin to build models that respond to how women actually feel, rather than just what the textbook says.
This opens the door to more empathetic, adaptable tools that meet users where they are, especially during the luteal phase, which is a time when many women experience mental health dips, fatigue, and emotional sensitivity that often go unsupported.
For users with irregular cycles or conditions like PCOS, personalisation is even more critical. A
I can offer meaningful support by learning patterns over time, offering insights not tied to fixed timelines but to symptom clusters, emotional rhythms, and lifestyle triggers.
Ethics, Trust, and Representation
Innovation without integrity is not enough.
If we are asking women to share intimate data, from cycle logs to mental health patterns, we must uphold the highest standards of transparency, ethics, and security.
Too many femtech products still lack clear data governance policies. In some cases, user data has been shared with third parties without informed consent.
These breaches of trust erode the very foundation that responsible AI must be built on.
Inclusive AI also requires inclusive teams.
We need more women at the table when products are being built. Representation matters, not just in marketing, but in design, development, and leadership too.
A Call to Collaborate
AI offers us the tools to radically transform women’s health, but only if we use them consciously.
Closing the gender data gap is not a solo project; it requires cross-disciplinary collaboration between founders, researchers, clinicians, and policymakers.
It means listening to women and building systems that evolve with the complexity of female bodies, rather than simplifying them for convenience.
As we enter a new era of health innovation, let’s not replicate old patterns.
Let’s create something better, something that sees women, hears women, and builds with women in mind.
Opinion
The $128b paradox: Corporate wellness vs women’s burnout
By Katrina Zalcmane, co-founder | partnerships and growth, Véa
The global corporate wellness market reached US$70.65 billion in 2024 and is projected to hit US$128 billion by 2033 – Europe leads the charge, capturing over 39.5 per cent of market share.
Meanwhile, femtech investment hit US$2.2 billion in 2024, representing 8.5 per cent of all digital health funding.
The message is clear: companies recognise that employee wellness matters and women’s health technology is finally getting serious investment.
So why are women still drowning?
In the UK, 91 per cent of adults report experiencing high or extreme stress levels – despite consumers spending an average of US$3,342 annually on wellness and self-care.
60 per cent of women in leadership positions report feeling constantly burned out, while 69 per cent of women feel emotionally drained after every workday.
Around 1 in 4 working women say they can’t manage workplace stress, with only 44 per cent confident their employer even has a burnout plan.
The numbers don’t add up. Billions flowing into wellness programmes. A femtech revolution promising personalised solutions.
And yet women ages 25-45 – the backbone of the modern workforce – are hitting crisis levels of exhaustion.
The problem isn’t a lack of investment – it’s what we’re investing in.
The Mismatch: What Companies Offer vs What Women Actually Need
Health risk assessments captured 21.2 per cent of the European corporate wellness market in 2024, while stress management programmes hold 13 per cent market share and continue expanding.
Companies are checking boxes: biometric screenings, mental health apps, flexible work, meditation subscriptions.
Yet these programmes consistently miss three critical factors:
1. Emotional data is invisible
Modern workplaces reward thinking, problem-solving and constant cognitive output.
What gets lost is the intelligence that comes from recognising early warning signals in the body – somatic indicators that burnout is building long before it becomes visible.
Women are taught to “think through” stress rather than listen to what their bodies are telling them. By the time burnout shows up in productivity metrics or sick days, the damage is done.
2. Hormonal rhythms are ignored
Corporate wellness assumes constant, linear productivity.
But women’s bodies don’t work that way. Menstrual cycles, perimenopause, fertility journeys – all create natural energy fluctuations that impact focus, stress response and cognitive performance.
Instead of working with these rhythms, most women fight against them, blaming themselves for “productivity dips” that are actually biological.
The result is chronic disconnection from their bodies and accelerated burnout.
3. Emotional labour stays uncounted
Women carry disproportionate loads of invisible work – managing team dynamics, mentoring, smoothing conflicts, holding space for others’ stress.
This labour never appears on performance reviews or workload assessments.
It accumulates beneath the surface until women hit a wall.
The Cost of Getting It Wrong
In the UK, mental health-related absences cost the economy approximately £21.6 billion annually, with employees taking 34 million sick days each year due to stress, depression and anxiety.
Employee burnout costs an average 1,000-person company US$5.04 million per year globally. Burned-out employees are 6 times more likely to leave, costing companies 50-200 per cent of salary in recruiting and training.
For women specifically, the crisis deepens.
Women new to leadership report 70 per cent burnout rates; for women of colour in senior positions, it reaches 77 per cent..
Nearly 40 per cent of women actively seeking new jobs cite burnout as the primary reason.
Replacing a mid- or senior-level woman costs up to 213 per cent of her annual salary.
We’re not just losing individual contributors but hemorrhaging the women leaders who hold institutional knowledge, mentor the next generation and drive diversity initiatives.
What Needs to Change
Instead of more generic wellness programs, we need to fundamentally rethink how we support women at work.
1. Shift from crisis response to prevention
Only 44 per cent of women feel confident their employer has a burnout plan – but by then, you’ve already lost.
Companies must teach women to recognise burnout signals in their bodies before a crisis hits. Somatic awareness catches exhaustion early, when intervention still works.
2. Design work around cyclical energy, not constant output
Women need organisational cultures that acknowledge hormonal rhythms as legitimate biological factors affecting performance.
This means training managers to understand energy fluctuations and designing workloads that account for them instead of just offering “flexible arrangements”.
3. Make invisible labour visible
Emotional labor must be quantified, acknowledged and redistributed.
This requires new frameworks for measuring contributions beyond traditional output metrics and structural changes preventing this work from defaulting to women.
4. Prioritise personalisation over one-size-fits-all
Workforce wellness now centres on personalisation powered by AI and data analytics.
A 27-year-old establishing her career has completely different needs than a 42-year-old navigating perimenopause while caring for ageing parents.
AI-driven platforms can deliver tailored support – virtual health assistants, personalised insights, telemedicine – making care more accessible for women balancing careers, family and wellness.
The Opportunity
Closing the women’s health gap could add at least $1 trillion annually to the global economy by 2040.
But unlocking that value requires interventions addressing burnout’s root causes, not just symptoms.
The market is already voting.
Virtual workplace wellness programmes saw substantial growth following the pandemic and Europe continues leading corporate wellness investment.
Companies in the UK and France are implementing AI-driven burnout assessments, hybrid wellness platforms and data-driven mental health monitoring.
Still, investment alone isn’t enough.
The question isn’t whether companies will spend on women’s wellness – they already are.
The question is whether they’ll invest in solutions that actually work: reconnecting women with somatic intelligence before burnout becomes visible, designing around hormonal rhythms rather than fighting them and making invisible labour visible so it can be redistributed.
The companies that do will win the talent war.
The ones that don’t will keep wondering why their best women keep leaving.
About Véa Workshops
Véa offers evidence-based corporate wellness workshops designed specifically for women professionals, addressing the root causes of burnout that traditional programs miss.
Grounded in neuroscience, psychology and somatic awareness, Véa workshops focus on prevention rather than crisis response – teaching women to recognise emotional data and somatic signals, work sustainably with hormonal rhythms and make invisible labor visible.
Available in formats from 45-minute executive sessions to half-day leadership offsites, these workshops support sustainable performance without asking women to step back from ambition.
Learn more at veajournal.app/workshops.
Opinion
From platforms to people: The next era of femtech
By Katrina Zalcmane, head of partnerships and growth, Véa
The next era of femtech shifts focus from platforms to people as women rethink how technology fits into wellness and social life.
Women are spending less time on ambient, always-on digital environments and more time in bounded, intentional, in-person settings.
This is not a rejection of technology but a reprioritisation of how and where it belongs. For femtech, this shift is not cosmetic. It signals a structural change in user expectations – one that has implications for product design, engagement models and long-term relevance.
I explore three key signals underpinning this shift: reduced engagement with social media platforms, the resurgence of in-person, women-led communities and growing fatigue with fragmented digital tools.
Signal 1: Declining Engagement With Social Platforms Among Women
Multiple data sources point to a flattening or decline in engagement with traditional social media platforms, particularly among women:
- Pew Research Center reports that adults are increasingly “actively limiting” their social media use, with women more likely than men to cite emotional exhaustion and reduced wellbeing as reasons.
- Ofcom’s Online Nation report shows year-on-year declines in time spent on social platforms among UK women aged 25–44, alongside rising use of messaging and offline coordination tools.
- Meta itself has acknowledged a shift away from “social graph” engagement toward private, smaller-group interactions in recent earnings calls.
While this is not mass abandonment, it does indicate selective withdrawal: fewer platforms, less ambient presence, more intentional use.
Signal 2: The Rise of In-Person, Women-Led Communities
At the same time, participation in physical, community-based activities has increased. Examples include:
- the growth of women-led run clubs and fitness collectives across major cities, often operating independently of digital platforms;
- the expansion of paid, small-scale retreats and circles focused on reflection, creativity or embodiment;
- increased demand for local, recurring group experiences rather than one-off events.
While women are stepping back from social platforms, they are stepping into real-world communities. ONS data on social capital shows a post-pandemic rebound in in-person participation, particularly among women aged 25-45, with a preference for smaller, repeat gatherings over large social events.
What distinguishes this wave of community-building is intentionality. These spaces are bounded, often invitation-based and deliberately offline.
They are designed to counteract overstimulation rather than add to it.
Signal 3: Tool Fatigue and the Consolidation of Digital Habits
Alongside social media fatigue, there is growing evidence of “tool fatigue” across wellness and productivity categories:
- App retention rates across health and wellness remain low, with industry benchmarks showing that fewer than 25 per cent of users remain active after 30 days.
- Deloitte’s Digital Consumer Trends report notes a move toward app consolidation, with users preferring fewer, multi-purpose tools over fragmented stacks.
- Qualitative studies show women are particularly sensitive to cognitive overload caused by managing multiple apps for mood, cycles, health, reflection and social coordination*.
The implication is not that women want less support but that they want smarter, simpler tools that can actually help manage their inner lives.
What This Means: A Shift in the Role of Technology
Taken together, these signals point to a clear trend: technology is moving from being a primary site of social life to a supporting layer around it.
Women are not asking apps to become communities. They are asking them to:
- help them reflect and process privately;
- reduce cognitive and emotional clutter;
- support real-world relationships rather than replace them;
- operate in bounded, intentional ways.
This reframes success metrics. Engagement time and daily active use become less meaningful than whether a tool genuinely increases capacity, clarity and presence outside the app.
Implications for Femtech
For femtech, this marks a decisive transition. The first phase of femtech focused on visibility: tracking cycles, symptoms and bodily data that had previously been ignored.
The next phase will focus on integration: helping women make sense of experience in ways that support how they live, relate and gather.
Femtech products that attempt to:
- replicate community digitally,
- build social feeds under the banner of wellbeing,
- position AI as a substitute for real connection,
risk misaligning with where behaviour is actually moving.
By contrast, femtech that treats technology as infrastructure, not destination, is better positioned for longevity.
Where Véa Fits
Véa was built with this shift in mind.
Rather than attempting to replace connection or build another social layer, Véa focuses on internal processing – neuroscience-backed journaling, emotional pattern recognition and reflective AI support – so that women can show up more clearly in their real lives.
Importantly, Véa is not only a digital tool.
It is designed to extend into physical space, through curated in-person experiences and community gatherings that prioritise presence, embodiment and shared reflection.
The digital layer exists to support the human one, not compete with it. In a context of tool fatigue and selective disengagement, this hybrid model – digital support paired with real-world interaction – aligns closely with how women are choosing to engage today.
Over the next decade, the most resilient femtech products will not be those that maximise time spent inside ecosystems but those that give women back the capacity to return to their lives – with greater clarity, energy and real-world connection.
It’s time to design femtech that empowers presence over engagement.
*Reich-Stiebert, N., Froehlich, L. and Voltmer, J.-B. (2023). ‘Gendered mental labor: A systematic literature review on the cognitive dimension of unpaid work within the household and childcare’, Sex Roles, 88, pp. 475–494.
Opinion
How Women in Tech Switch Off Without Switching Off
Modern tech work blurs the boundary between focus and fatigue. Notifications spill into evenings, side projects jostle for attention, and the same screens we use to ship code stream our downtime. The answer is not to disconnect completely. It is to design small, protective rituals that restore energy while keeping a gentle sense of control. Short, low pressure restorative online play can sit alongside other evening habits without draining tomorrow’s focus.
Make Recovery a Feature, Not a Fix
Burnout rarely arrives in a single moment. It builds through micro stresses that never get cleared. Treat recovery as a product feature you ship every evening, simple and reliable rather than grand and rare. Start with boundaries that mark the end of the workday. Close the laptop, write a one line note about tomorrow’s first task, and put your kit out of sight. That single gesture creates a clean edge the brain respects.
Then change the environment. Shift lighting from cool to warm, swap the chair for the sofa, and set your phone to a calmer home screen. These cues matter. They tell your nervous system the mode has changed so you can mix mental rest with light engagement that still feels intentional.
Short, Screen-literate Rituals That Actually Work
- A ten minute mobility or stretch video resets posture after hours at a desk
- A tidy loop, like clearing the downloads folder or filing screenshots, reduces digital noise
- A breath guided practice that ends on the dot gives a measurable downshift
- A single chapter of a book or a short podcast episode keeps attention light and finite
When energy is low, aim for the smallest possible win. Two minutes of breathing still counts. One drawer tidied is still progress. Preserve the shape of recovery rather than chasing perfection.
Where Light Online Play Fits
Play is a human need, not a teenage phase. In the right dose it helps down regulate stress and restores a sense of agency after a day of reacting to tickets and pings. Keep it light and bounded. Choose modes that resolve in fifteen to twenty minutes, mute work apps, and set a visible stop time before you start. The aim is a calm, finite session that ends cleanly.
Cosy builders, puzzles, or narrative adventures often deliver novelty without social pressure. If you prefer something social, co-op rounds that finish quickly provide connection without dragging the night. Headphones with a gentle volume limit protect shared spaces and evening quiet.
Pair play with tiny chores so life runs smoother. Start a short download, fold laundry while it completes, then enjoy your round guilt free because the house already feels calmer. This is deliberate energy management, not indulgence.
Design a Space That Calms On Sight
- Put a warm lamp on a simple timer so evenings do not begin under harsh light
- Keep controllers, headphones, and chargers in one tray so play starts cleanly and puts away fast
- Use a standing phone dock during dinner to avoid reflex checks
- Keep the bedroom device light and cool in tone so your brain associates the space with sleep
If you live with others, make the evening rhythm visible. A shared quiet hours note, a soft household wind down alarm, and a last call for dishwashing help everyone respect the boundary between work and rest.
A Weeknight Template That Holds Under Pressure
- Shutdown: one line for tomorrow, close tabs, quick desk tidy
- Reset: ten to fifteen minutes to settle the kitchen and lay out morning basics
- Nourish: simple dinner that keeps cleanup minimal
- Reward: one short activity on a timer, with light online play as an option
- Wind down: warm lights, gentle stretch, phone on do not disturb, consistent lights out
If you miss a step, shrink it rather than skipping the whole routine. Small completions compound. Over a month they beat heroic bursts every time.
Leadership Starts With Example
Team norms shape personal wellbeing more than any tool. If you manage others, model sane hours and visible shutdowns. Delay send late emails, publish focus blocks, and praise outcomes over urgency theatre. Encourage short, restorative breaks through the day so evenings do not have to undo quite as much. When leaders normalise humane rhythms, teams follow and results improve because people are not running on fumes.
-
Fertility4 weeks agoDesigner perfumes recalled over banned chemical posing fertility risk
-
Insight2 weeks agoParents sue IVF clinic after delivering someone else’s baby
-
Insight3 weeks agoWomen’s health could unlock US$100bn by 2030
-
Insight4 weeks agoChina’s birth rate hits record low despite government fertility efforts
-
Menopause3 weeks agoHRT linked to greater weight loss on tirzepatide
-
Entrepreneur6 days agoUS startup builds wearable hormone tracker
-
Menopause2 weeks agoFlo Health and Mayo Clinic publish global perimenopause awareness study
-
News4 weeks agoVerdane invest in Clue to accelerate the future of women’s health





