News
Inside UK’s “gynaecology care crisis”: RCOG calls for ring-fenced funding, innovation and research

The Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists has called for urgent government funding for women’s health and care in the UK, as research shows gynaecology waiting lists have doubled since 2020.
A new report, published this week by the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG) finds that three quarters of a million (755,046) women across the UK are now waiting for gynaecology treatment— enough to fill Wembley stadium eight times over.
Waiting lists have increased by a third since 2022 and additional BBC research shows they are now almost double that of 2020. Just before the pandemic 360,400 women were waiting for treatment.
But this is only the tip of the iceberg, according to the RCOG, which believes thousands more are waiting for other forms of care, including diagnostic tests to confirm their condition.
In order to track the state of gynaecological care in the UK, the RCOG collaborated with LCP Health Analytics, to develop an Elective Recovery Tracker tool, bringing together publicly available datasets in one place for the first time. It also surveyed over 2,000 affected women and over 300 healthcare professionals.
A quarter of women reported that they had attended A&E as a result of their symptoms, with more than 1 in 10 of those going on to have emergency interventions.
Over three quarters (76 per cent) of women waiting for care reported worsening mental health and over two thirds (69 per cent) reported being unable to take part in daily activities including work.
Healthcare professionals also reported being deeply concerned for their patients and the majority of primary (65 per cent) and secondary care clinicians (69 per cent) surveyed reported their own health and wellbeing has been affected by managing pressure in their clinics.
Additionally, over 90 per cent of primary care professionals reported a severe impact on general practice due to longer waits for hospital gynaecology services.
“No part of life left untouched”
Kerry Briggs, a patient in her early 50s from near Manchester, has been waiting for treatment for fibroids since January 2023.
“During this time, I’ve experienced severe bleeding, back pain, hip pain and had to manage challenging symptoms of anaemia as a result of my blood loss,” she says.
“The anxiety I’ve felt whilst waiting has been all encompassing. I can’t book anything in advance and I feel completely stuck in the house. If you don’t have cancer, your condition is given less urgency and importance but there is no part of my life left untouched by this. It has to be taken more seriously.”
Meanwhile, India Weir, 27 from near Edinburgh has also been on and off waiting lists since being diagnosed with endometriosis in 2017. She is currently waiting for surgery to manage my deep infiltrating endometriosis and ovarian cysts.
“Physically, being in pain every single day takes a huge toll on me whilst I have to get on with day-to-day life. Also, living with the uncertainty of when I’ll undergo surgery makes it hard to plan ahead,” India says.
“It impacts every part of my life and my quality of life. My relationships, friendships, social life, career and mental health are all affected – and my condition is getting worse without treatment and relevant care.”
A way forward?
The RCOG’s Waiting for a way forward report, funded by Theramex, sets out recommendations for the government to support patients and healthcare professionals now, while improving the future of women’s health and care.
This includes increasing the amount of funding for health services, considering targeted funding to expedite the longest waits, and providing resources to protect gynaecology services against operational pressures.
The government is also urged to consider building on existing digital initiatives, such as the Elective Recovery Tracker, expanding data collection and to commit to ring-fenced funding to enable research, patient participation, innovation and pilots to improve understanding and experiences of gynaecology.
The Elective Recovery Tracker provides regular updates on the backlog in gynaecology elective care and provides visualisations of the size, scale and nature of waits in gynaecology services across the UK.
According to Rebecca Sloan, Women’s health lead at LCP Health Analytics: “The analysis should help healthcare professionals and policymakers to identify where additional resources and focus is likely to have the greatest impact on patient outcomes and health inequalities.”
Last week the Women and Equalities Select Committee continued an inquiry on Women’s Reproductive Health Conditions, which looked at how the NHS can leverage femtech to improve treatment and care.
Dr Sue Mann, the first National Clinical Director for Women’s Health at NHS England and a consultant and lead for women’s health in City and Hackney, North East London, highlighted the importance of “keeping pace” with innovation in women’s health, but said the NHS must “get better” at producing its own digital information too.
Innovative pathways for gynaecology
However, the NHS can also tap into existing “innovative pathways” such as telemedicine to reduce waiting lists, according to some experts, who say many of the needs of those waiting could be met outside of acute hospital care.
Kat James, director of new projects at the telemedicine company, Consultant Connect, told Femtech World: “There is a history of women’s health being ignored and 750,000 patients waiting for hospital treatment is worrying. The truth is that a large majority of these women do not need hospital-based care, if only the right virtual and community-based alternatives were available.
“Face-to-face hospital-based care is the right place for those that need acute care, but for many conditions, often in the context of menopause related symptoms, community care is the faster way to help women. And this includes innovative pathways like telemedicine, where a patient can be given an immediate treatment plan without having to set foot into a physical healthcare setting.”
Consultant Connect runs a network of NHS consultants who review gynaecology referrals remotely, virtually triaging thousands for NHS trusts around the country. Its data shows that around one third to half of gynaecological referrals don’t need to be on hospital waiting lists.
“On average 30-40 per cent of patients receive treatment plans written up by ‘virtual’ NHS gynaecologists that their GPs can enact immediately, and another large cohort is directed to community-based care like women’s’ hubs if available in their area,” explains James.
“Not only does this deliver faster care, but also reduces stress, anxiety and unnecessary time of work, childcare and travel that comes with months long waits and hospital appointments.”
Long-term funding and investment
Commenting on the latest figures, leaders from the RCOG, as well as the Royal College of GPs have called on the government to act “urgently” to tackle the UK’s “gynaecology care crisis” with “long-term sustained funding”.
Dr Ranee Thakar, president of the RCOG, said: “A way forward is urgently needed to tackle the UK gynaecology crisis. Our new report shows too many women are waiting too long with serious conditions that can devastate their lives. NHS staff are also deeply concerned and distressed that they do not have the necessary resources to deliver good care, affecting their own wellbeing.
“UK governments must act now. The RCOG is calling on them to commit to long-term, sustained funding to address the systemic issues driving waiting lists, alongside delivering an urgent support package for those currently on waiting lists.
“This investment will not only benefit thousands of individual women but the wider economy too, because the evidence shows that healthy women are the cornerstone of healthy societies. Get it right for women and everyone benefits.”
Fertility
AI could transform ovarian care through personalisation, study finds

AI could transform ovarian care by personalising cancer and fertility treatment, but more clinical validation is needed before routine use.
A systematic review and meta-analysis found AI models showed high diagnostic accuracy for ovarian cancer when combining data such as ultrasound scans and blood test results.
Across 81 studies, AI models correctly identified ovarian cancer in around nine out of 10 cases, with pooled rates of 89 to 94 per cent.
They were also highly accurate at ruling out ovarian cancer when it was not present, with specificity of 85 to 91 per cent.
The analysis also found that explainable AI tools could predict complete surgical cytoreduction in advanced ovarian cancer.
Complete surgical cytoreduction means removing all visible cancer during surgery, which can be an important goal in treatment planning.
The tools achieved a pooled AUC of 0.87. AUC is a measure of how well a model distinguishes between different outcomes, with higher scores showing stronger performance.
In reproductive medicine, AI algorithms helped physicians optimise ovarian stimulation protocols and predict follicular growth during IVF.
Ovarian stimulation is the use of hormones to encourage the ovaries to produce eggs, while follicles are the small sacs in the ovaries where eggs develop.
The review found AI could reliably model ovarian response in IVF with a pooled AUC of 0.81.
However, researchers said challenges remain in translating promising research findings into routine clinical practice.
They identified substantial variation across studies, driven by retrospective study designs, variable AI systems and a lack of standardised validation.
Only 22 per cent of analysed studies reported prospective, multicentre external validation, where models are tested forward in time across multiple healthcare settings.
The authors called for rigorous validation to help close the gap between research and routine clinical practice, alongside standardised methodological and reporting frameworks, smooth integration with clinical workflow and robust governance to support responsible and ethical AI use.
They concluded: “Artificial intelligence is a transformative force in the management of ovarian conditions.
“In gynaecologic oncology, AI enhances every phase of care, from early detection and accurate diagnosis to prognostic stratification and surgical planning.”
In reproductive medicine, AI personalises ovarian stimulation and refines the diagnosis of heterogenous endocrine disorders such as PCOS.
PCOS, or polycystic ovary syndrome, is a hormonal condition that can affect periods, skin, weight and fertility.
Cancer
Three cancer innovators shortlisted for Femtech World Award

Femtech World is delighted to reveal the shortlist for this year’s Women’s Cancer Innovation award.
The award, sponsored by Endomag, will honour a groundbreaking innovation dedicated to the prevention, early detection treatment or ongoing care of cancers that uniquely or disproportionately affect women.
Endomag is a medical technology company devoted to improving the global standard of cancer care.
Its Sentimag system, Magseed marker and Magtrace lymphatic tracer are used by thousands of the world’s leading physicians and cancer centres.
After careful review of this year’s submissions, we are delighted to announce the three shortlisted entries for the Women’s Cancer Innovation Award 2026.

Auria is tackling one of the most stubborn problems in breast cancer screening: the 66 per cent of women who simply don’t participate.
Rather than improving existing imaging pathways, Auria is creating an entirely new access layer: a non-invasive, at-home test that detects protein biomarkers for breast cancer in tears.
Auria’s test, a CLIA-certified Lab Developed Test, has been validated across more than 2,000 patients in multiple clinical studies with collaborators including MD Anderson Cancer Center and Stanford University.
It reports a sensitivity of 93 per cent and a negative predictive value of 98 per cent.

Founded on six years of combined research at the University of Barcelona and UC Irvine, The Blue Box has developed a non-invasive, urine-based test that detects breast cancer by analysing volatile organic compound (VOC) signatures – no radiation, no compression, no imaging facility required.
The test achieves a sensitivity of 88.42 per cent, outperforming mammography by 15 per cent overall, and by 30 per cent specifically in women with dense breasts.
The technology could function as a first-line screening tool in primary care settings, as a complement to mammography for high-density patients, or as an accessible alternative in healthcare systems where imaging infrastructure is limited.

Celbrea is a disposable and affordable thermal screening device that empowers women of all ages to stay on top of monitoring their breast health.
The device aims to add to doctors’ existing standard evaluation protocols with a quick, painless examination. Celbrea does not replace a mammogram but simply provides an additional way to screen for breast disease, including breast cancer.
The device consisting of two disposable pads with photochromic sensors. The pads are self-applied to each breast for 15 minutes.
1188 nano-sensors are embedded within a biocompatible multilayer pad, accurately measuring any temperature differences on the surface of the breast using liquid crystal thermographic technology.
What happens next
The shortlisted entries will now be judge by an Endomag representative who will reveal the winner at a virtual awards event on June 19.
Winners will receive a trophy and will be interviewed by a Femtech World journalist.
Insight
Common cancer marker may play active role in preventing the disease, study finds

Ki-67, a protein used to measure tumour growth, may also help prevent chromosome errors that drive cancer, a study suggests.
The findings could change how scientists view Ki-67, a marker commonly used in breast cancer and other tumours to assess how quickly cancer cells are growing.
Researchers found the protein may help preserve genome stability by maintaining the structural integrity of centromeres, key parts of chromosomes that help ensure DNA is shared correctly during cell division.
The research was led by professor Paola Vagnarelli at Brunel University of London in collaboration with scientists at the University of Edinburgh and the Technical University of Berlin.
Professor Vagnarelli said: “Doctors already measure Ki-67 to see how aggressive a cancer might be. But our results suggest it is actually helping maintain genome stability.
“That means it may be more than a marker. It could potentially also be a therapeutic target.”
The study examined three proteins that attach to chromosomes during cell division and help rebuild the molecular system that tells each new cell what kind of cell it is.
Every human cell carries identical DNA. What makes a liver cell different from a brain cell is which genes are switched on and which are kept inactive.
When a cell divides, that entire system of switches must be rebuilt. The three proteins involved in this process were Ki-67, Repo-Man and PNUTS.
Vagnarelli’s team developed a method that individually removes each protein from a living cell at the precise point of division. Older techniques could not isolate that moment cleanly.
They found that cells rely on all three proteins to reset themselves after division, but each failed in a different way when removed.
Without PNUTS, gene activity spiralled out of control and thousands of genes switched on at once.
Without Repo-Man, cells escaped safety checkpoints that usually stop damaged or abnormal cells from continuing to divide.
“What we didn’t expect was how clean the separation was,” said Vagnarelli.
Each protein fails in its own specific way. There is no redundancy, no safety net. Which means there are three separate points at which this process can go wrong.
“When the system breaks down, cells can emerge with the wrong number of chromosomes. That condition, called aneuploidy, is seen in disorders such as Down syndrome and in many cancers.
“We also found that these chromosome errors can trigger inflammatory signals inside the cell.”
Aneuploidy means a cell has too many or too few chromosomes, which can disrupt normal growth and function.
Inflammatory signals are chemical messages that can make a cell behave as if it is responding to injury or infection.
“These cells behave almost as if they are under attack,” said Vagnarelli.
“The immune response switches on because the genome is unstable.
“That link between chromosome imbalance and inflammation could help explain patterns we see in several diseases.”
The researchers said the findings may help cancer scientists better understand how chromosome instability, loss of gene regulation and cells dividing before they are ready contribute to tumour growth.
They said understanding the normal machinery that prevents these errors may help researchers find ways to push cancer cells into making mistakes they cannot survive.
“We now have a clearer map of the machinery that resets the cell after division,” said Vagnarelli.
“That knowledge gives us a starting point for thinking about new therapeutic approaches.”
Entrepreneur3 weeks agoFuture Fertility raises Series A financing to scale AI tools redefining fertility care worldwide
News3 weeks agoWomen’s digital health market set to reach US$5.28 billion in 2026 – report
Diagnosis3 weeks agoNew meta-analysis further supports low re-excisions and high placement accuracy with the Magseed marker
Pregnancy3 weeks agoNIPT or NT scan? Why the 2026 evidence supports doing Both
Mental health4 weeks agoLifting weights shows mental health and cognitive benefits in older women, study finds
Wellness4 weeks agoResistance training has preventative effects in menopause, study finds
Wellness2 weeks agoWomen’s HealthX unveils Northwell Health, Corewell Health, Biogen & more to headline Chronic Disease stage
Insight3 weeks agoWhy the UK’s fertility rate keeps falling – and what it means if you’re trying now












